Cargando…

Quantifying morphological variation in the Castilleja pilosa species complex (Orobanchaceae)

Robustly delimited species are of paramount importance, the identification of which relies on our ability to discern boundaries between one species and the next. This is not difficult to do when species are very distinct from one another. However, in recently evolved lineages where putative species...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jacobs, Sarah J., Herzog, Sarah, Tank, David C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6589334/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31259097
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7090
_version_ 1783429383261782016
author Jacobs, Sarah J.
Herzog, Sarah
Tank, David C.
author_facet Jacobs, Sarah J.
Herzog, Sarah
Tank, David C.
author_sort Jacobs, Sarah J.
collection PubMed
description Robustly delimited species are of paramount importance, the identification of which relies on our ability to discern boundaries between one species and the next. This is not difficult to do when species are very distinct from one another. However, in recently evolved lineages where putative species may have relatively few diagnostic features (e.g., species complexes composed of very similar species, the boundaries between which are often unclear), defining species boundaries can be more challenging. Hence, the field of species delimitation has widely advocated the use of multiple lines of evidence to delimit species, particularly in species complexes. Excessive taxonomic confusion, often the result of species descriptions that shift through time (e.g., during revisionary work and regional treatments), can further complicate the search for diagnostic features in species complexes. Here, as a first step in robustly delimiting species boundaries, we quantify and describe morphological variation in the Castilleja pilosa species complex. We first infer the morphospace of the species complex and use fuzzy-clustering techniques to explore the morphological variation in the system. Next, we hypothesize the position of type specimens within that morphospace. In so doing, we aim to visualize the impact that regional treatments have had on the conceptualization of taxa through time. We find that there is limited morphological variation among members of this complex, and we determine that the morphological concept of these species have shifted through time and are no longer accurately represented by species descriptions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6589334
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65893342019-06-28 Quantifying morphological variation in the Castilleja pilosa species complex (Orobanchaceae) Jacobs, Sarah J. Herzog, Sarah Tank, David C. PeerJ Biodiversity Robustly delimited species are of paramount importance, the identification of which relies on our ability to discern boundaries between one species and the next. This is not difficult to do when species are very distinct from one another. However, in recently evolved lineages where putative species may have relatively few diagnostic features (e.g., species complexes composed of very similar species, the boundaries between which are often unclear), defining species boundaries can be more challenging. Hence, the field of species delimitation has widely advocated the use of multiple lines of evidence to delimit species, particularly in species complexes. Excessive taxonomic confusion, often the result of species descriptions that shift through time (e.g., during revisionary work and regional treatments), can further complicate the search for diagnostic features in species complexes. Here, as a first step in robustly delimiting species boundaries, we quantify and describe morphological variation in the Castilleja pilosa species complex. We first infer the morphospace of the species complex and use fuzzy-clustering techniques to explore the morphological variation in the system. Next, we hypothesize the position of type specimens within that morphospace. In so doing, we aim to visualize the impact that regional treatments have had on the conceptualization of taxa through time. We find that there is limited morphological variation among members of this complex, and we determine that the morphological concept of these species have shifted through time and are no longer accurately represented by species descriptions. PeerJ Inc. 2019-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6589334/ /pubmed/31259097 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7090 Text en © 2019 Jacobs et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Biodiversity
Jacobs, Sarah J.
Herzog, Sarah
Tank, David C.
Quantifying morphological variation in the Castilleja pilosa species complex (Orobanchaceae)
title Quantifying morphological variation in the Castilleja pilosa species complex (Orobanchaceae)
title_full Quantifying morphological variation in the Castilleja pilosa species complex (Orobanchaceae)
title_fullStr Quantifying morphological variation in the Castilleja pilosa species complex (Orobanchaceae)
title_full_unstemmed Quantifying morphological variation in the Castilleja pilosa species complex (Orobanchaceae)
title_short Quantifying morphological variation in the Castilleja pilosa species complex (Orobanchaceae)
title_sort quantifying morphological variation in the castilleja pilosa species complex (orobanchaceae)
topic Biodiversity
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6589334/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31259097
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7090
work_keys_str_mv AT jacobssarahj quantifyingmorphologicalvariationinthecastillejapilosaspeciescomplexorobanchaceae
AT herzogsarah quantifyingmorphologicalvariationinthecastillejapilosaspeciescomplexorobanchaceae
AT tankdavidc quantifyingmorphologicalvariationinthecastillejapilosaspeciescomplexorobanchaceae