Cargando…

Evaluation of critical thinking course for premedical students using literature and film

PURPOSE: Premedical education is one stage in which various educational approaches are used to promote critical thinking. Given that critical thinking ability could be regarded as one of the intended outcomes of social science and humanities education, this study explored the effectiveness of a cour...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Kim, Do-Hwan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Medical Education 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6589626/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30852858
http://dx.doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2019.115
_version_ 1783429417802924032
author Kim, Do-Hwan
author_facet Kim, Do-Hwan
author_sort Kim, Do-Hwan
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Premedical education is one stage in which various educational approaches are used to promote critical thinking. Given that critical thinking ability could be regarded as one of the intended outcomes of social science and humanities education, this study explored the effectiveness of a course to promote critical thinking in a premedical curriculum using both literature and film. METHODS: Fifty-one 2nd year premedical students enrolled in a ‘Critical Thinking for Premeds’ course. Students were required to read or watch a selected material, submit group discussion agendas, attend five group discussion sessions, and write critical essays. Five tutors facilitated the group discussions, observed and assessed the students’ performance and critical essay. Students’ critical thinking disposition and opinion on assigned reading materials were examined before and after the course. A program evaluation survey was conducted to investigate the students’ reaction after the course. RESULTS: On average, students appreciated 78.6% of the total assigned materials. The students indicated that group discussions and the narrative comments of facilitators contributed the most to develop critical thinking. After the course, the students’ tendency preferring cheaper price books, as well as medicine-related books decreased significantly. Students who had critical essay scores greater than or equal to the median demonstrated a significant improvement in critical thinking disposition scores. CONCLUSION: The course was well-accepted by premedical students and had several positive outcomes. A more effective use of the course could be anticipated with a clearer explanation of the purpose, the consideration of previous reading experience, and use of complementary learning activities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6589626
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Korean Society of Medical Education
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65896262019-06-27 Evaluation of critical thinking course for premedical students using literature and film Kim, Do-Hwan Korean J Med Educ Original Research PURPOSE: Premedical education is one stage in which various educational approaches are used to promote critical thinking. Given that critical thinking ability could be regarded as one of the intended outcomes of social science and humanities education, this study explored the effectiveness of a course to promote critical thinking in a premedical curriculum using both literature and film. METHODS: Fifty-one 2nd year premedical students enrolled in a ‘Critical Thinking for Premeds’ course. Students were required to read or watch a selected material, submit group discussion agendas, attend five group discussion sessions, and write critical essays. Five tutors facilitated the group discussions, observed and assessed the students’ performance and critical essay. Students’ critical thinking disposition and opinion on assigned reading materials were examined before and after the course. A program evaluation survey was conducted to investigate the students’ reaction after the course. RESULTS: On average, students appreciated 78.6% of the total assigned materials. The students indicated that group discussions and the narrative comments of facilitators contributed the most to develop critical thinking. After the course, the students’ tendency preferring cheaper price books, as well as medicine-related books decreased significantly. Students who had critical essay scores greater than or equal to the median demonstrated a significant improvement in critical thinking disposition scores. CONCLUSION: The course was well-accepted by premedical students and had several positive outcomes. A more effective use of the course could be anticipated with a clearer explanation of the purpose, the consideration of previous reading experience, and use of complementary learning activities. Korean Society of Medical Education 2019-03 2019-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6589626/ /pubmed/30852858 http://dx.doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2019.115 Text en © The Korean Society of Medical Education. All rights reserved. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Kim, Do-Hwan
Evaluation of critical thinking course for premedical students using literature and film
title Evaluation of critical thinking course for premedical students using literature and film
title_full Evaluation of critical thinking course for premedical students using literature and film
title_fullStr Evaluation of critical thinking course for premedical students using literature and film
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of critical thinking course for premedical students using literature and film
title_short Evaluation of critical thinking course for premedical students using literature and film
title_sort evaluation of critical thinking course for premedical students using literature and film
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6589626/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30852858
http://dx.doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2019.115
work_keys_str_mv AT kimdohwan evaluationofcriticalthinkingcourseforpremedicalstudentsusingliteratureandfilm