Cargando…

No temporal contrast enhancement of simple decreases in noxious heat

Offset analgesia (OA) studies have found that small decreases in the intensity of a tonic noxious heat stimulus yield a disproportionately large amount of pain relief. In the classic OA paradigm, the decrease in stimulus intensity is preceded by an increase of equal size from an initial noxious leve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Beck, Brianna, Gnanasampanthan, Sahana, Iannetti, Gian Domenico, Haggard, Patrick
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Physiological Society 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6589718/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30840535
http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00335.2018
_version_ 1783429428738523136
author Beck, Brianna
Gnanasampanthan, Sahana
Iannetti, Gian Domenico
Haggard, Patrick
author_facet Beck, Brianna
Gnanasampanthan, Sahana
Iannetti, Gian Domenico
Haggard, Patrick
author_sort Beck, Brianna
collection PubMed
description Offset analgesia (OA) studies have found that small decreases in the intensity of a tonic noxious heat stimulus yield a disproportionately large amount of pain relief. In the classic OA paradigm, the decrease in stimulus intensity is preceded by an increase of equal size from an initial noxious level. Although the majority of researchers believe this temporal sequence of two changes is important for eliciting OA, it has also been suggested that the temporal contrast mechanism underlying OA may enhance detection of simple, isolated decreases in noxious heat. To test whether decreases in noxious heat intensity, by themselves, are perceived better than increases of comparable sizes, we used an adaptive two-interval alternative forced choice task to find perceptual thresholds for increases and decreases in radiant and contact heat. Decreases in noxious heat were more difficult to perceive than increases of comparable sizes from the same initial temperature of 45°C. In contrast, decreases and increases were perceived equally well within a common range of noxious temperatures (i.e., when increases started from 45°C and decreases started from 47°C). In another task, participants rated the pain intensity of heat stimuli that randomly and unpredictably increased, decreased, or remained constant. Ratings of unpredictable stimulus decreases also showed no evidence of perceptual enhancement. Our results demonstrate that there is no temporal contrast enhancement of simple, isolated decreases in noxious heat intensity. Combined with previous OA findings, they suggest that long-lasting noxious stimuli that follow an increase-decrease pattern may be important for eliciting the OA effect. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Previous research suggested that a small decrease in noxious heat intensity feels surprisingly large because of sensory enhancement of noxious stimulus offsets (a simplified form of “offset analgesia”). Using a two-alternative forced choice task where participants detected simple increases or decreases in noxious heat, we showed that decreases in noxious heat, by themselves, are no better perceived than increases of comparable sizes. This suggests that a decrease alone is not sufficient to elicit offset analgesia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6589718
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher American Physiological Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65897182019-06-25 No temporal contrast enhancement of simple decreases in noxious heat Beck, Brianna Gnanasampanthan, Sahana Iannetti, Gian Domenico Haggard, Patrick J Neurophysiol Research Article Offset analgesia (OA) studies have found that small decreases in the intensity of a tonic noxious heat stimulus yield a disproportionately large amount of pain relief. In the classic OA paradigm, the decrease in stimulus intensity is preceded by an increase of equal size from an initial noxious level. Although the majority of researchers believe this temporal sequence of two changes is important for eliciting OA, it has also been suggested that the temporal contrast mechanism underlying OA may enhance detection of simple, isolated decreases in noxious heat. To test whether decreases in noxious heat intensity, by themselves, are perceived better than increases of comparable sizes, we used an adaptive two-interval alternative forced choice task to find perceptual thresholds for increases and decreases in radiant and contact heat. Decreases in noxious heat were more difficult to perceive than increases of comparable sizes from the same initial temperature of 45°C. In contrast, decreases and increases were perceived equally well within a common range of noxious temperatures (i.e., when increases started from 45°C and decreases started from 47°C). In another task, participants rated the pain intensity of heat stimuli that randomly and unpredictably increased, decreased, or remained constant. Ratings of unpredictable stimulus decreases also showed no evidence of perceptual enhancement. Our results demonstrate that there is no temporal contrast enhancement of simple, isolated decreases in noxious heat intensity. Combined with previous OA findings, they suggest that long-lasting noxious stimuli that follow an increase-decrease pattern may be important for eliciting the OA effect. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Previous research suggested that a small decrease in noxious heat intensity feels surprisingly large because of sensory enhancement of noxious stimulus offsets (a simplified form of “offset analgesia”). Using a two-alternative forced choice task where participants detected simple increases or decreases in noxious heat, we showed that decreases in noxious heat, by themselves, are no better perceived than increases of comparable sizes. This suggests that a decrease alone is not sufficient to elicit offset analgesia. American Physiological Society 2019-05-01 2019-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6589718/ /pubmed/30840535 http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00335.2018 Text en Copyright © 2019 the American Physiological Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en_US Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution CC-BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en_US) : © the American Physiological Society.
spellingShingle Research Article
Beck, Brianna
Gnanasampanthan, Sahana
Iannetti, Gian Domenico
Haggard, Patrick
No temporal contrast enhancement of simple decreases in noxious heat
title No temporal contrast enhancement of simple decreases in noxious heat
title_full No temporal contrast enhancement of simple decreases in noxious heat
title_fullStr No temporal contrast enhancement of simple decreases in noxious heat
title_full_unstemmed No temporal contrast enhancement of simple decreases in noxious heat
title_short No temporal contrast enhancement of simple decreases in noxious heat
title_sort no temporal contrast enhancement of simple decreases in noxious heat
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6589718/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30840535
http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00335.2018
work_keys_str_mv AT beckbrianna notemporalcontrastenhancementofsimpledecreasesinnoxiousheat
AT gnanasampanthansahana notemporalcontrastenhancementofsimpledecreasesinnoxiousheat
AT iannettigiandomenico notemporalcontrastenhancementofsimpledecreasesinnoxiousheat
AT haggardpatrick notemporalcontrastenhancementofsimpledecreasesinnoxiousheat