Cargando…

Are model organisms representative for climate change research? Testing thermal tolerance in wild and laboratory zebrafish populations

Model organisms can be useful for studying climate change impacts, but it is unclear whether domestication to laboratory conditions has altered their thermal tolerance and therefore how representative of wild populations they are. Zebrafish in the wild live in fluctuating thermal environments that p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morgan, Rachael, Sundin, Josefin, Finnøen, Mette H, Dresler, Gunnar, Vendrell, Marc Martínez, Dey, Arpita, Sarkar, Kripan, Jutfelt, Fredrik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6589993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31249690
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/conphys/coz036
_version_ 1783429467290468352
author Morgan, Rachael
Sundin, Josefin
Finnøen, Mette H
Dresler, Gunnar
Vendrell, Marc Martínez
Dey, Arpita
Sarkar, Kripan
Jutfelt, Fredrik
author_facet Morgan, Rachael
Sundin, Josefin
Finnøen, Mette H
Dresler, Gunnar
Vendrell, Marc Martínez
Dey, Arpita
Sarkar, Kripan
Jutfelt, Fredrik
author_sort Morgan, Rachael
collection PubMed
description Model organisms can be useful for studying climate change impacts, but it is unclear whether domestication to laboratory conditions has altered their thermal tolerance and therefore how representative of wild populations they are. Zebrafish in the wild live in fluctuating thermal environments that potentially reach harmful temperatures. In the laboratory, zebrafish have gone through four decades of domestication and adaptation to stable optimal temperatures with few thermal extremes. If maintaining thermal tolerance is costly or if genetic traits promoting laboratory fitness at optimal temperature differ from genetic traits for high thermal tolerance, the thermal tolerance of laboratory zebrafish could be hypothesized to be lower than that of wild zebrafish. Furthermore, very little is known about the thermal environment of wild zebrafish and how close to their thermal limits they live. Here, we compared the acute upper thermal tolerance (critical thermal maxima; CT(max)) of wild zebrafish measured on-site in West Bengal, India, to zebrafish at three laboratory acclimation/domestication levels: wild-caught, F(1) generation wild-caught and domesticated laboratory AB-WT line. We found that in the wild, CT(max) increased with increasing site temperature. Yet at the warmest site, zebrafish lived very close to their thermal limit, suggesting that they may currently encounter lethal temperatures. In the laboratory, acclimation temperature appeared to have a stronger effect on CT(max) than it did in the wild. The fish in the wild also had a 0.85–1.01°C lower CT(max) compared to all laboratory populations. This difference between laboratory-held and wild populations shows that environmental conditions can affect zebrafish’s thermal tolerance. However, there was no difference in CT(max) between the laboratory-held populations regardless of the domestication duration. This suggests that thermal tolerance is maintained during domestication and highlights that experiments using domesticated laboratory-reared model species can be appropriate for addressing certain questions on thermal tolerance and global warming impacts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6589993
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65899932019-06-27 Are model organisms representative for climate change research? Testing thermal tolerance in wild and laboratory zebrafish populations Morgan, Rachael Sundin, Josefin Finnøen, Mette H Dresler, Gunnar Vendrell, Marc Martínez Dey, Arpita Sarkar, Kripan Jutfelt, Fredrik Conserv Physiol Research Article Model organisms can be useful for studying climate change impacts, but it is unclear whether domestication to laboratory conditions has altered their thermal tolerance and therefore how representative of wild populations they are. Zebrafish in the wild live in fluctuating thermal environments that potentially reach harmful temperatures. In the laboratory, zebrafish have gone through four decades of domestication and adaptation to stable optimal temperatures with few thermal extremes. If maintaining thermal tolerance is costly or if genetic traits promoting laboratory fitness at optimal temperature differ from genetic traits for high thermal tolerance, the thermal tolerance of laboratory zebrafish could be hypothesized to be lower than that of wild zebrafish. Furthermore, very little is known about the thermal environment of wild zebrafish and how close to their thermal limits they live. Here, we compared the acute upper thermal tolerance (critical thermal maxima; CT(max)) of wild zebrafish measured on-site in West Bengal, India, to zebrafish at three laboratory acclimation/domestication levels: wild-caught, F(1) generation wild-caught and domesticated laboratory AB-WT line. We found that in the wild, CT(max) increased with increasing site temperature. Yet at the warmest site, zebrafish lived very close to their thermal limit, suggesting that they may currently encounter lethal temperatures. In the laboratory, acclimation temperature appeared to have a stronger effect on CT(max) than it did in the wild. The fish in the wild also had a 0.85–1.01°C lower CT(max) compared to all laboratory populations. This difference between laboratory-held and wild populations shows that environmental conditions can affect zebrafish’s thermal tolerance. However, there was no difference in CT(max) between the laboratory-held populations regardless of the domestication duration. This suggests that thermal tolerance is maintained during domestication and highlights that experiments using domesticated laboratory-reared model species can be appropriate for addressing certain questions on thermal tolerance and global warming impacts. Oxford University Press 2019-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6589993/ /pubmed/31249690 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/conphys/coz036 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press and the Society for Experimental Biology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Morgan, Rachael
Sundin, Josefin
Finnøen, Mette H
Dresler, Gunnar
Vendrell, Marc Martínez
Dey, Arpita
Sarkar, Kripan
Jutfelt, Fredrik
Are model organisms representative for climate change research? Testing thermal tolerance in wild and laboratory zebrafish populations
title Are model organisms representative for climate change research? Testing thermal tolerance in wild and laboratory zebrafish populations
title_full Are model organisms representative for climate change research? Testing thermal tolerance in wild and laboratory zebrafish populations
title_fullStr Are model organisms representative for climate change research? Testing thermal tolerance in wild and laboratory zebrafish populations
title_full_unstemmed Are model organisms representative for climate change research? Testing thermal tolerance in wild and laboratory zebrafish populations
title_short Are model organisms representative for climate change research? Testing thermal tolerance in wild and laboratory zebrafish populations
title_sort are model organisms representative for climate change research? testing thermal tolerance in wild and laboratory zebrafish populations
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6589993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31249690
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/conphys/coz036
work_keys_str_mv AT morganrachael aremodelorganismsrepresentativeforclimatechangeresearchtestingthermaltoleranceinwildandlaboratoryzebrafishpopulations
AT sundinjosefin aremodelorganismsrepresentativeforclimatechangeresearchtestingthermaltoleranceinwildandlaboratoryzebrafishpopulations
AT finnøenmetteh aremodelorganismsrepresentativeforclimatechangeresearchtestingthermaltoleranceinwildandlaboratoryzebrafishpopulations
AT dreslergunnar aremodelorganismsrepresentativeforclimatechangeresearchtestingthermaltoleranceinwildandlaboratoryzebrafishpopulations
AT vendrellmarcmartinez aremodelorganismsrepresentativeforclimatechangeresearchtestingthermaltoleranceinwildandlaboratoryzebrafishpopulations
AT deyarpita aremodelorganismsrepresentativeforclimatechangeresearchtestingthermaltoleranceinwildandlaboratoryzebrafishpopulations
AT sarkarkripan aremodelorganismsrepresentativeforclimatechangeresearchtestingthermaltoleranceinwildandlaboratoryzebrafishpopulations
AT jutfeltfredrik aremodelorganismsrepresentativeforclimatechangeresearchtestingthermaltoleranceinwildandlaboratoryzebrafishpopulations