Cargando…

Greater Trochanter Apophysiodesis in Legg–Calve–Perthes Disease: Which Implant to Choose?

BACKGROUND: Greater trochanter apophysiodesis (GTA) is relatively minimal invasive technique for the treatment of trochanteric overgrowth. Various types of implants can be used in each procedure. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes of three different types of implants that were used in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Akpinar, Evren, Ozyalvac, Osman Nuri, Bayhan, Ilhan Avni, Beng, Kubilay, Kocabiyik, Ahmet, Yagmurlu, Mehmet Firat
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6590009/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31303671
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_166_18
_version_ 1783429470809489408
author Akpinar, Evren
Ozyalvac, Osman Nuri
Bayhan, Ilhan Avni
Beng, Kubilay
Kocabiyik, Ahmet
Yagmurlu, Mehmet Firat
author_facet Akpinar, Evren
Ozyalvac, Osman Nuri
Bayhan, Ilhan Avni
Beng, Kubilay
Kocabiyik, Ahmet
Yagmurlu, Mehmet Firat
author_sort Akpinar, Evren
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Greater trochanter apophysiodesis (GTA) is relatively minimal invasive technique for the treatment of trochanteric overgrowth. Various types of implants can be used in each procedure. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes of three different types of implants that were used in treatment of trochanteric overgrowth in Legg–Calve–Perthes disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively studied radiological results of three implants (screw, screw washer, and EP) on inhibiting trochanteric growth in 32 patients. Articulo-trochanteric and trochanter-trochanter distances (TTDs) were measured on radiographs. Embedding of implant evaluated on final radiographs. RESULTS: The mean of age at the surgery was 10 ± 2.3 years, and the mean of follow up period was 50.0 ± 16.7 months. In all groups, articulo-trochanteric distance was decreased on final radiographs. In screw and screw washer group, increase of TTD was not statistically significant (P < 0.05). Twelve, one, and two implants were embedded, respectively, in screw, screw washer, and EP groups. Two patients in EP group had revision surgery due to loosening. CONCLUSIONS: In this study group, GTA using screw and screw washer methods could slow down but did not restore trochanteric overgrowth. We suggest using washer to reduce embedding of the screw.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6590009
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65900092019-07-13 Greater Trochanter Apophysiodesis in Legg–Calve–Perthes Disease: Which Implant to Choose? Akpinar, Evren Ozyalvac, Osman Nuri Bayhan, Ilhan Avni Beng, Kubilay Kocabiyik, Ahmet Yagmurlu, Mehmet Firat Indian J Orthop Original Article BACKGROUND: Greater trochanter apophysiodesis (GTA) is relatively minimal invasive technique for the treatment of trochanteric overgrowth. Various types of implants can be used in each procedure. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes of three different types of implants that were used in treatment of trochanteric overgrowth in Legg–Calve–Perthes disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively studied radiological results of three implants (screw, screw washer, and EP) on inhibiting trochanteric growth in 32 patients. Articulo-trochanteric and trochanter-trochanter distances (TTDs) were measured on radiographs. Embedding of implant evaluated on final radiographs. RESULTS: The mean of age at the surgery was 10 ± 2.3 years, and the mean of follow up period was 50.0 ± 16.7 months. In all groups, articulo-trochanteric distance was decreased on final radiographs. In screw and screw washer group, increase of TTD was not statistically significant (P < 0.05). Twelve, one, and two implants were embedded, respectively, in screw, screw washer, and EP groups. Two patients in EP group had revision surgery due to loosening. CONCLUSIONS: In this study group, GTA using screw and screw washer methods could slow down but did not restore trochanteric overgrowth. We suggest using washer to reduce embedding of the screw. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6590009/ /pubmed/31303671 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_166_18 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Indian Journal of Orthopaedics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Akpinar, Evren
Ozyalvac, Osman Nuri
Bayhan, Ilhan Avni
Beng, Kubilay
Kocabiyik, Ahmet
Yagmurlu, Mehmet Firat
Greater Trochanter Apophysiodesis in Legg–Calve–Perthes Disease: Which Implant to Choose?
title Greater Trochanter Apophysiodesis in Legg–Calve–Perthes Disease: Which Implant to Choose?
title_full Greater Trochanter Apophysiodesis in Legg–Calve–Perthes Disease: Which Implant to Choose?
title_fullStr Greater Trochanter Apophysiodesis in Legg–Calve–Perthes Disease: Which Implant to Choose?
title_full_unstemmed Greater Trochanter Apophysiodesis in Legg–Calve–Perthes Disease: Which Implant to Choose?
title_short Greater Trochanter Apophysiodesis in Legg–Calve–Perthes Disease: Which Implant to Choose?
title_sort greater trochanter apophysiodesis in legg–calve–perthes disease: which implant to choose?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6590009/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31303671
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_166_18
work_keys_str_mv AT akpinarevren greatertrochanterapophysiodesisinleggcalveperthesdiseasewhichimplanttochoose
AT ozyalvacosmannuri greatertrochanterapophysiodesisinleggcalveperthesdiseasewhichimplanttochoose
AT bayhanilhanavni greatertrochanterapophysiodesisinleggcalveperthesdiseasewhichimplanttochoose
AT bengkubilay greatertrochanterapophysiodesisinleggcalveperthesdiseasewhichimplanttochoose
AT kocabiyikahmet greatertrochanterapophysiodesisinleggcalveperthesdiseasewhichimplanttochoose
AT yagmurlumehmetfirat greatertrochanterapophysiodesisinleggcalveperthesdiseasewhichimplanttochoose