Cargando…

Evaluating Quality of Contraceptive Counseling: An Analysis of the Method Information Index

The Method Information Index (MII) is calculated from contraceptive users’ responses to questions regarding counseling content—whether they were informed about methods other than the one they received, told about method‐specific side effects, and advised what to do if they experienced side effects....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chang, Karen T., Mukanu, Mulenga, Bellows, Ben, Hameed, Waqas, Kalamar, Amanda M., Grépin, Karen A., Gul, Xaher, Chakraborty, Nirali M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6590213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30666641
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/sifp.12081
_version_ 1783429510314590208
author Chang, Karen T.
Mukanu, Mulenga
Bellows, Ben
Hameed, Waqas
Kalamar, Amanda M.
Grépin, Karen A.
Gul, Xaher
Chakraborty, Nirali M.
author_facet Chang, Karen T.
Mukanu, Mulenga
Bellows, Ben
Hameed, Waqas
Kalamar, Amanda M.
Grépin, Karen A.
Gul, Xaher
Chakraborty, Nirali M.
author_sort Chang, Karen T.
collection PubMed
description The Method Information Index (MII) is calculated from contraceptive users’ responses to questions regarding counseling content—whether they were informed about methods other than the one they received, told about method‐specific side effects, and advised what to do if they experienced side effects. The MII is increasingly reported in national surveys and used to track program performance, but little is known about its properties. Using additional questions, we assessed the consistency between responses and the method received in a prospective, multicountry study. We employed two definitions of consistency: (1) presence of any concordant response, and (2) absence of discordant responses. Consistency was high when asking whether users were informed about other methods and what to do about side effects. Responses were least consistent when asking whether side effects were mentioned. Adjusting for inconsistency, scores were up to 50 percent and 30 percent lower in Pakistan and Uganda, respectively, compared to unadjusted MII scores. Additional questions facilitated better understanding of counseling quality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6590213
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65902132019-07-08 Evaluating Quality of Contraceptive Counseling: An Analysis of the Method Information Index Chang, Karen T. Mukanu, Mulenga Bellows, Ben Hameed, Waqas Kalamar, Amanda M. Grépin, Karen A. Gul, Xaher Chakraborty, Nirali M. Stud Fam Plann Articles The Method Information Index (MII) is calculated from contraceptive users’ responses to questions regarding counseling content—whether they were informed about methods other than the one they received, told about method‐specific side effects, and advised what to do if they experienced side effects. The MII is increasingly reported in national surveys and used to track program performance, but little is known about its properties. Using additional questions, we assessed the consistency between responses and the method received in a prospective, multicountry study. We employed two definitions of consistency: (1) presence of any concordant response, and (2) absence of discordant responses. Consistency was high when asking whether users were informed about other methods and what to do about side effects. Responses were least consistent when asking whether side effects were mentioned. Adjusting for inconsistency, scores were up to 50 percent and 30 percent lower in Pakistan and Uganda, respectively, compared to unadjusted MII scores. Additional questions facilitated better understanding of counseling quality. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-01-21 2019-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6590213/ /pubmed/30666641 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/sifp.12081 Text en © 2019, The Authors. Studies in Family Planning published by The Population Council, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Articles
Chang, Karen T.
Mukanu, Mulenga
Bellows, Ben
Hameed, Waqas
Kalamar, Amanda M.
Grépin, Karen A.
Gul, Xaher
Chakraborty, Nirali M.
Evaluating Quality of Contraceptive Counseling: An Analysis of the Method Information Index
title Evaluating Quality of Contraceptive Counseling: An Analysis of the Method Information Index
title_full Evaluating Quality of Contraceptive Counseling: An Analysis of the Method Information Index
title_fullStr Evaluating Quality of Contraceptive Counseling: An Analysis of the Method Information Index
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating Quality of Contraceptive Counseling: An Analysis of the Method Information Index
title_short Evaluating Quality of Contraceptive Counseling: An Analysis of the Method Information Index
title_sort evaluating quality of contraceptive counseling: an analysis of the method information index
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6590213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30666641
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/sifp.12081
work_keys_str_mv AT changkarent evaluatingqualityofcontraceptivecounselingananalysisofthemethodinformationindex
AT mukanumulenga evaluatingqualityofcontraceptivecounselingananalysisofthemethodinformationindex
AT bellowsben evaluatingqualityofcontraceptivecounselingananalysisofthemethodinformationindex
AT hameedwaqas evaluatingqualityofcontraceptivecounselingananalysisofthemethodinformationindex
AT kalamaramandam evaluatingqualityofcontraceptivecounselingananalysisofthemethodinformationindex
AT grepinkarena evaluatingqualityofcontraceptivecounselingananalysisofthemethodinformationindex
AT gulxaher evaluatingqualityofcontraceptivecounselingananalysisofthemethodinformationindex
AT chakrabortyniralim evaluatingqualityofcontraceptivecounselingananalysisofthemethodinformationindex