Cargando…
Evaluating Quality of Contraceptive Counseling: An Analysis of the Method Information Index
The Method Information Index (MII) is calculated from contraceptive users’ responses to questions regarding counseling content—whether they were informed about methods other than the one they received, told about method‐specific side effects, and advised what to do if they experienced side effects....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6590213/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30666641 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/sifp.12081 |
_version_ | 1783429510314590208 |
---|---|
author | Chang, Karen T. Mukanu, Mulenga Bellows, Ben Hameed, Waqas Kalamar, Amanda M. Grépin, Karen A. Gul, Xaher Chakraborty, Nirali M. |
author_facet | Chang, Karen T. Mukanu, Mulenga Bellows, Ben Hameed, Waqas Kalamar, Amanda M. Grépin, Karen A. Gul, Xaher Chakraborty, Nirali M. |
author_sort | Chang, Karen T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Method Information Index (MII) is calculated from contraceptive users’ responses to questions regarding counseling content—whether they were informed about methods other than the one they received, told about method‐specific side effects, and advised what to do if they experienced side effects. The MII is increasingly reported in national surveys and used to track program performance, but little is known about its properties. Using additional questions, we assessed the consistency between responses and the method received in a prospective, multicountry study. We employed two definitions of consistency: (1) presence of any concordant response, and (2) absence of discordant responses. Consistency was high when asking whether users were informed about other methods and what to do about side effects. Responses were least consistent when asking whether side effects were mentioned. Adjusting for inconsistency, scores were up to 50 percent and 30 percent lower in Pakistan and Uganda, respectively, compared to unadjusted MII scores. Additional questions facilitated better understanding of counseling quality. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6590213 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65902132019-07-08 Evaluating Quality of Contraceptive Counseling: An Analysis of the Method Information Index Chang, Karen T. Mukanu, Mulenga Bellows, Ben Hameed, Waqas Kalamar, Amanda M. Grépin, Karen A. Gul, Xaher Chakraborty, Nirali M. Stud Fam Plann Articles The Method Information Index (MII) is calculated from contraceptive users’ responses to questions regarding counseling content—whether they were informed about methods other than the one they received, told about method‐specific side effects, and advised what to do if they experienced side effects. The MII is increasingly reported in national surveys and used to track program performance, but little is known about its properties. Using additional questions, we assessed the consistency between responses and the method received in a prospective, multicountry study. We employed two definitions of consistency: (1) presence of any concordant response, and (2) absence of discordant responses. Consistency was high when asking whether users were informed about other methods and what to do about side effects. Responses were least consistent when asking whether side effects were mentioned. Adjusting for inconsistency, scores were up to 50 percent and 30 percent lower in Pakistan and Uganda, respectively, compared to unadjusted MII scores. Additional questions facilitated better understanding of counseling quality. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-01-21 2019-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6590213/ /pubmed/30666641 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/sifp.12081 Text en © 2019, The Authors. Studies in Family Planning published by The Population Council, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Articles Chang, Karen T. Mukanu, Mulenga Bellows, Ben Hameed, Waqas Kalamar, Amanda M. Grépin, Karen A. Gul, Xaher Chakraborty, Nirali M. Evaluating Quality of Contraceptive Counseling: An Analysis of the Method Information Index |
title | Evaluating Quality of Contraceptive Counseling: An Analysis of the Method Information Index |
title_full | Evaluating Quality of Contraceptive Counseling: An Analysis of the Method Information Index |
title_fullStr | Evaluating Quality of Contraceptive Counseling: An Analysis of the Method Information Index |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating Quality of Contraceptive Counseling: An Analysis of the Method Information Index |
title_short | Evaluating Quality of Contraceptive Counseling: An Analysis of the Method Information Index |
title_sort | evaluating quality of contraceptive counseling: an analysis of the method information index |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6590213/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30666641 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/sifp.12081 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT changkarent evaluatingqualityofcontraceptivecounselingananalysisofthemethodinformationindex AT mukanumulenga evaluatingqualityofcontraceptivecounselingananalysisofthemethodinformationindex AT bellowsben evaluatingqualityofcontraceptivecounselingananalysisofthemethodinformationindex AT hameedwaqas evaluatingqualityofcontraceptivecounselingananalysisofthemethodinformationindex AT kalamaramandam evaluatingqualityofcontraceptivecounselingananalysisofthemethodinformationindex AT grepinkarena evaluatingqualityofcontraceptivecounselingananalysisofthemethodinformationindex AT gulxaher evaluatingqualityofcontraceptivecounselingananalysisofthemethodinformationindex AT chakrabortyniralim evaluatingqualityofcontraceptivecounselingananalysisofthemethodinformationindex |