Cargando…

Nanopore sequencing: An enrichment‐free alternative to mitochondrial DNA sequencing

Mitochondrial DNA sequence data are often utilized in disease studies, conservation genetics and forensic identification. The current approaches for sequencing the full mtGenome typically require several rounds of PCR enrichment during Sanger or MPS protocols followed by fairly tedious assembly and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zascavage, Roxanne R., Thorson, Kelcie, Planz, John V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6590251/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30511783
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/elps.201800083
_version_ 1783429519146745856
author Zascavage, Roxanne R.
Thorson, Kelcie
Planz, John V.
author_facet Zascavage, Roxanne R.
Thorson, Kelcie
Planz, John V.
author_sort Zascavage, Roxanne R.
collection PubMed
description Mitochondrial DNA sequence data are often utilized in disease studies, conservation genetics and forensic identification. The current approaches for sequencing the full mtGenome typically require several rounds of PCR enrichment during Sanger or MPS protocols followed by fairly tedious assembly and analysis. Here we describe an efficient approach to sequencing directly from genomic DNA samples without prior enrichment or extensive library preparation steps. A comparison is made between libraries sequenced directly from native DNA and the same samples sequenced from libraries generated with nine overlapping mtDNA amplicons on the Oxford Nanopore MinION™ device. The native and amplicon library preparation methods and alternative base calling strategies were assessed to establish error rates and identify trends of discordance between the two library preparation approaches. For the complete mtGenome, 16 569 nucleotides, an overall error rate of approximately 1.00% was observed. As expected with mtDNA, the majority of error was detected in homopolymeric regions. The use of a modified basecaller that corrects for ambiguous signal in homopolymeric stretches reduced the error rate for both library preparation methods to approximately 0.30%. Our study indicates that direct mtDNA sequencing from native DNA on the MinION™ device provides comparable results to those obtained from common mtDNA sequencing methods and is a reliable alternative to approaches using PCR‐enriched libraries.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6590251
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65902512019-07-08 Nanopore sequencing: An enrichment‐free alternative to mitochondrial DNA sequencing Zascavage, Roxanne R. Thorson, Kelcie Planz, John V. Electrophoresis Part III. Methodologies and Applications Mitochondrial DNA sequence data are often utilized in disease studies, conservation genetics and forensic identification. The current approaches for sequencing the full mtGenome typically require several rounds of PCR enrichment during Sanger or MPS protocols followed by fairly tedious assembly and analysis. Here we describe an efficient approach to sequencing directly from genomic DNA samples without prior enrichment or extensive library preparation steps. A comparison is made between libraries sequenced directly from native DNA and the same samples sequenced from libraries generated with nine overlapping mtDNA amplicons on the Oxford Nanopore MinION™ device. The native and amplicon library preparation methods and alternative base calling strategies were assessed to establish error rates and identify trends of discordance between the two library preparation approaches. For the complete mtGenome, 16 569 nucleotides, an overall error rate of approximately 1.00% was observed. As expected with mtDNA, the majority of error was detected in homopolymeric regions. The use of a modified basecaller that corrects for ambiguous signal in homopolymeric stretches reduced the error rate for both library preparation methods to approximately 0.30%. Our study indicates that direct mtDNA sequencing from native DNA on the MinION™ device provides comparable results to those obtained from common mtDNA sequencing methods and is a reliable alternative to approaches using PCR‐enriched libraries. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-12-13 2019-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6590251/ /pubmed/30511783 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/elps.201800083 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Electrophoresis published by WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Part III. Methodologies and Applications
Zascavage, Roxanne R.
Thorson, Kelcie
Planz, John V.
Nanopore sequencing: An enrichment‐free alternative to mitochondrial DNA sequencing
title Nanopore sequencing: An enrichment‐free alternative to mitochondrial DNA sequencing
title_full Nanopore sequencing: An enrichment‐free alternative to mitochondrial DNA sequencing
title_fullStr Nanopore sequencing: An enrichment‐free alternative to mitochondrial DNA sequencing
title_full_unstemmed Nanopore sequencing: An enrichment‐free alternative to mitochondrial DNA sequencing
title_short Nanopore sequencing: An enrichment‐free alternative to mitochondrial DNA sequencing
title_sort nanopore sequencing: an enrichment‐free alternative to mitochondrial dna sequencing
topic Part III. Methodologies and Applications
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6590251/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30511783
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/elps.201800083
work_keys_str_mv AT zascavageroxanner nanoporesequencinganenrichmentfreealternativetomitochondrialdnasequencing
AT thorsonkelcie nanoporesequencinganenrichmentfreealternativetomitochondrialdnasequencing
AT planzjohnv nanoporesequencinganenrichmentfreealternativetomitochondrialdnasequencing