Cargando…

Systematic review of the use of big data to improve surgery in low‐ and middle‐income countries

BACKGROUND: Technological advances have led to the generation of large amounts of data, both in surgical research and practice. Despite this, it is unclear how much originates in low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMICs) and what barriers exist to the use of such data in improving surgical care. The...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Knight, S. R., Ots, R., Maimbo, M., Drake, T. M., Fairfield, C. J., Harrison, E. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6590290/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30620075
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs.11052
_version_ 1783429526127116288
author Knight, S. R.
Ots, R.
Maimbo, M.
Drake, T. M.
Fairfield, C. J.
Harrison, E. M.
author_facet Knight, S. R.
Ots, R.
Maimbo, M.
Drake, T. M.
Fairfield, C. J.
Harrison, E. M.
author_sort Knight, S. R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Technological advances have led to the generation of large amounts of data, both in surgical research and practice. Despite this, it is unclear how much originates in low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMICs) and what barriers exist to the use of such data in improving surgical care. The aim of this review was to capture the extent and impact of programmes that use large volumes of patient data on surgical care in LMICs. METHODS: A PRISMA‐compliant systematic literature review of PubMed, Embase and Google Scholar was performed in August 2018. Prospective studies collecting large volumes of patient‐level data within LMIC settings were included and evaluated qualitatively. RESULTS: A total of 68 studies were included from 71 LMICs, involving 708 032 patients. The number of patients in included studies varied widely (from 335 to 428 346), with 25 reporting data on 3000 or more LMIC patients. Patient inclusion in large‐data studies in LMICs has increased dramatically since 2015. Studies predominantly involved Brazil, China, India and Thailand, with low patient numbers from Africa and Latin America. Outcomes after surgery were commonly the focus (33 studies); very few large studies looked at access to surgical care or patient expenditure. The use of large data sets specifically to improve surgical outcomes in LMICs is currently limited. CONCLUSION: Large volumes of data are becoming more common and provide a strong foundation for continuing investigation. Future studies should address questions more specific to surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6590290
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65902902019-07-08 Systematic review of the use of big data to improve surgery in low‐ and middle‐income countries Knight, S. R. Ots, R. Maimbo, M. Drake, T. M. Fairfield, C. J. Harrison, E. M. Br J Surg Systematic Review BACKGROUND: Technological advances have led to the generation of large amounts of data, both in surgical research and practice. Despite this, it is unclear how much originates in low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMICs) and what barriers exist to the use of such data in improving surgical care. The aim of this review was to capture the extent and impact of programmes that use large volumes of patient data on surgical care in LMICs. METHODS: A PRISMA‐compliant systematic literature review of PubMed, Embase and Google Scholar was performed in August 2018. Prospective studies collecting large volumes of patient‐level data within LMIC settings were included and evaluated qualitatively. RESULTS: A total of 68 studies were included from 71 LMICs, involving 708 032 patients. The number of patients in included studies varied widely (from 335 to 428 346), with 25 reporting data on 3000 or more LMIC patients. Patient inclusion in large‐data studies in LMICs has increased dramatically since 2015. Studies predominantly involved Brazil, China, India and Thailand, with low patient numbers from Africa and Latin America. Outcomes after surgery were commonly the focus (33 studies); very few large studies looked at access to surgical care or patient expenditure. The use of large data sets specifically to improve surgical outcomes in LMICs is currently limited. CONCLUSION: Large volumes of data are becoming more common and provide a strong foundation for continuing investigation. Future studies should address questions more specific to surgery. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2019-01-08 2019-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6590290/ /pubmed/30620075 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs.11052 Text en © 2019 The Authors. BJS published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJS Society Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Knight, S. R.
Ots, R.
Maimbo, M.
Drake, T. M.
Fairfield, C. J.
Harrison, E. M.
Systematic review of the use of big data to improve surgery in low‐ and middle‐income countries
title Systematic review of the use of big data to improve surgery in low‐ and middle‐income countries
title_full Systematic review of the use of big data to improve surgery in low‐ and middle‐income countries
title_fullStr Systematic review of the use of big data to improve surgery in low‐ and middle‐income countries
title_full_unstemmed Systematic review of the use of big data to improve surgery in low‐ and middle‐income countries
title_short Systematic review of the use of big data to improve surgery in low‐ and middle‐income countries
title_sort systematic review of the use of big data to improve surgery in low‐ and middle‐income countries
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6590290/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30620075
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs.11052
work_keys_str_mv AT knightsr systematicreviewoftheuseofbigdatatoimprovesurgeryinlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT otsr systematicreviewoftheuseofbigdatatoimprovesurgeryinlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT maimbom systematicreviewoftheuseofbigdatatoimprovesurgeryinlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT draketm systematicreviewoftheuseofbigdatatoimprovesurgeryinlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT fairfieldcj systematicreviewoftheuseofbigdatatoimprovesurgeryinlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT harrisonem systematicreviewoftheuseofbigdatatoimprovesurgeryinlowandmiddleincomecountries