Cargando…

Comparison of two different radiofrequency ablation systems for renal artery denervation: Evaluation of short‐term and long‐term follow up

OBJECTIVES: To assess the clinical efficacy of renal artery denervation (RAD) in our center and to compare the efficacy of two different radiofrequency (RF) systems. BACKGROUND: Several systems are available for RF renal denervation. Whether there is a difference in clinical efficacy among various s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Al Raisi, Sara I., Pouliopoulos, Jim, Qian, Pierre, King, Patricia, Byth, Karen, Barry, Michael T., Swinnen, John, Thiagalingam, Aravinda, Kovoor, Pramesh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6590350/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30549404
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ccd.28038
_version_ 1783429539518480384
author Al Raisi, Sara I.
Pouliopoulos, Jim
Qian, Pierre
King, Patricia
Byth, Karen
Barry, Michael T.
Swinnen, John
Thiagalingam, Aravinda
Kovoor, Pramesh
author_facet Al Raisi, Sara I.
Pouliopoulos, Jim
Qian, Pierre
King, Patricia
Byth, Karen
Barry, Michael T.
Swinnen, John
Thiagalingam, Aravinda
Kovoor, Pramesh
author_sort Al Raisi, Sara I.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To assess the clinical efficacy of renal artery denervation (RAD) in our center and to compare the efficacy of two different radiofrequency (RF) systems. BACKGROUND: Several systems are available for RF renal denervation. Whether there is a difference in clinical efficacy among various systems remains unknown. METHODS: Renal artery denervation was performed on 43 patients with resistant hypertension using either the single electrode Symplicity Flex (n = 20) or the multi‐electrode EnligHTN system (n = 23). Median post‐procedural follow‐up was 32.93 months. The primary outcome was post‐procedural change in office blood pressure (BP) within 1 year (short‐term follow‐up). Secondary outcomes were change in office BP between 1 and 4 years (long‐term follow‐up) and the difference in office BP reduction between the two systems at each follow‐up period. RESULTS: For the total cohort, mean baseline office BP (systolic/diastolic) was 174/94 mmHg. At follow‐up, mean changes in office BP from baseline were −19.70/−11.86 mmHg (P < 0.001) and −21.90/−13.94 mmHg (P < 0.001) for short‐term and long‐term follow‐up, respectively. The differences in office BP reduction between Symplicity and EnligHTN groups were 8.96/1.23 mmHg (P = 0.42 for systolic BP, P = 0.83 for diastolic BP) and 9.56/7.68 mmHg (P = 0.14 for systolic BP, P = 0.07 for diastolic BP) for short‐term and long‐term follow‐up, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort, there was a clinically significant office BP reduction after RAD, which persisted up to 4 years. No significant difference in office BP reduction between the two systems was found.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6590350
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65903502019-07-08 Comparison of two different radiofrequency ablation systems for renal artery denervation: Evaluation of short‐term and long‐term follow up Al Raisi, Sara I. Pouliopoulos, Jim Qian, Pierre King, Patricia Byth, Karen Barry, Michael T. Swinnen, John Thiagalingam, Aravinda Kovoor, Pramesh Catheter Cardiovasc Interv VASCULAR BIOLOGY (E‐only Articles) OBJECTIVES: To assess the clinical efficacy of renal artery denervation (RAD) in our center and to compare the efficacy of two different radiofrequency (RF) systems. BACKGROUND: Several systems are available for RF renal denervation. Whether there is a difference in clinical efficacy among various systems remains unknown. METHODS: Renal artery denervation was performed on 43 patients with resistant hypertension using either the single electrode Symplicity Flex (n = 20) or the multi‐electrode EnligHTN system (n = 23). Median post‐procedural follow‐up was 32.93 months. The primary outcome was post‐procedural change in office blood pressure (BP) within 1 year (short‐term follow‐up). Secondary outcomes were change in office BP between 1 and 4 years (long‐term follow‐up) and the difference in office BP reduction between the two systems at each follow‐up period. RESULTS: For the total cohort, mean baseline office BP (systolic/diastolic) was 174/94 mmHg. At follow‐up, mean changes in office BP from baseline were −19.70/−11.86 mmHg (P < 0.001) and −21.90/−13.94 mmHg (P < 0.001) for short‐term and long‐term follow‐up, respectively. The differences in office BP reduction between Symplicity and EnligHTN groups were 8.96/1.23 mmHg (P = 0.42 for systolic BP, P = 0.83 for diastolic BP) and 9.56/7.68 mmHg (P = 0.14 for systolic BP, P = 0.07 for diastolic BP) for short‐term and long‐term follow‐up, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort, there was a clinically significant office BP reduction after RAD, which persisted up to 4 years. No significant difference in office BP reduction between the two systems was found. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2018-12-14 2019-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6590350/ /pubmed/30549404 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ccd.28038 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle VASCULAR BIOLOGY (E‐only Articles)
Al Raisi, Sara I.
Pouliopoulos, Jim
Qian, Pierre
King, Patricia
Byth, Karen
Barry, Michael T.
Swinnen, John
Thiagalingam, Aravinda
Kovoor, Pramesh
Comparison of two different radiofrequency ablation systems for renal artery denervation: Evaluation of short‐term and long‐term follow up
title Comparison of two different radiofrequency ablation systems for renal artery denervation: Evaluation of short‐term and long‐term follow up
title_full Comparison of two different radiofrequency ablation systems for renal artery denervation: Evaluation of short‐term and long‐term follow up
title_fullStr Comparison of two different radiofrequency ablation systems for renal artery denervation: Evaluation of short‐term and long‐term follow up
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of two different radiofrequency ablation systems for renal artery denervation: Evaluation of short‐term and long‐term follow up
title_short Comparison of two different radiofrequency ablation systems for renal artery denervation: Evaluation of short‐term and long‐term follow up
title_sort comparison of two different radiofrequency ablation systems for renal artery denervation: evaluation of short‐term and long‐term follow up
topic VASCULAR BIOLOGY (E‐only Articles)
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6590350/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30549404
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ccd.28038
work_keys_str_mv AT alraisisarai comparisonoftwodifferentradiofrequencyablationsystemsforrenalarterydenervationevaluationofshorttermandlongtermfollowup
AT pouliopoulosjim comparisonoftwodifferentradiofrequencyablationsystemsforrenalarterydenervationevaluationofshorttermandlongtermfollowup
AT qianpierre comparisonoftwodifferentradiofrequencyablationsystemsforrenalarterydenervationevaluationofshorttermandlongtermfollowup
AT kingpatricia comparisonoftwodifferentradiofrequencyablationsystemsforrenalarterydenervationevaluationofshorttermandlongtermfollowup
AT bythkaren comparisonoftwodifferentradiofrequencyablationsystemsforrenalarterydenervationevaluationofshorttermandlongtermfollowup
AT barrymichaelt comparisonoftwodifferentradiofrequencyablationsystemsforrenalarterydenervationevaluationofshorttermandlongtermfollowup
AT swinnenjohn comparisonoftwodifferentradiofrequencyablationsystemsforrenalarterydenervationevaluationofshorttermandlongtermfollowup
AT thiagalingamaravinda comparisonoftwodifferentradiofrequencyablationsystemsforrenalarterydenervationevaluationofshorttermandlongtermfollowup
AT kovoorpramesh comparisonoftwodifferentradiofrequencyablationsystemsforrenalarterydenervationevaluationofshorttermandlongtermfollowup