Cargando…

No Threshold Exists for Recommending Revision Surgery in Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasty Patients With Adverse Reactions to Metal Debris: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 346 Revisions

BACKGROUND: Surgeons currently have difficulty when managing metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty (MoMHA) patients with adverse reactions to metal debris (ARMD). This stems from a lack of evidence, which is emphasized by the variability in the recommendations proposed by different worldwide regulatory au...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matharu, Gulraj S., Berryman, Fiona, Dunlop, David J., Revell, Matthew P., Judge, Andrew, Murray, David W., Pandit, Hemant G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor and Francis 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6590389/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30992241
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.03.022
_version_ 1783429548535185408
author Matharu, Gulraj S.
Berryman, Fiona
Dunlop, David J.
Revell, Matthew P.
Judge, Andrew
Murray, David W.
Pandit, Hemant G.
author_facet Matharu, Gulraj S.
Berryman, Fiona
Dunlop, David J.
Revell, Matthew P.
Judge, Andrew
Murray, David W.
Pandit, Hemant G.
author_sort Matharu, Gulraj S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Surgeons currently have difficulty when managing metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty (MoMHA) patients with adverse reactions to metal debris (ARMD). This stems from a lack of evidence, which is emphasized by the variability in the recommendations proposed by different worldwide regulatory authorities for considering MoMHA revision surgery. We investigated predictors of poor outcomes following MoMHA revision surgery performed for ARMD to help inform the revision threshold and type of reconstruction. METHODS: We retrospectively studied 346 MoMHA revisions for ARMD performed at 2 European centers. Preoperative (metal ions/imaging) and intraoperative (findings, components removed/implanted) factors were used to predict poor outcomes. Poor outcomes were postoperative complications (including re-revision), 90-day mortality, and poor Oxford Hip Score. RESULTS: Poor outcomes occurred in 38.5%. Shorter time (under 4 years) to revision surgery was the only preoperative predictor of poor outcomes (odds ratio [OR] = 2.12, confidence interval [CI] = 1.00-4.46). Prerevision metal ions and imaging did not influence outcomes. Single-component revisions (vs all-component revisions) increased the risk of poor outcomes (OR = 2.99, CI = 1.50-5.97). Intraoperative modifiable factors reducing the risk of poor outcomes included the posterior approach (OR = 0.22, CI = 0.10-0.49), revision head sizes ≥36 mm (vs <36 mm: OR = 0.37, CI = 0.18-0.77), ceramic-on-polyethylene revision bearings (OR vs ceramic-on-ceramic = 0.30, CI = 0.14-0.66), and metal-on-polyethylene revision bearings (OR vs ceramic-on-ceramic = 0.37, CI = 0.17-0.83). CONCLUSION: No threshold exists for recommending revision in MoMHA patients with ARMD. However postrevision outcomes were surgeon modifiable. Optimal outcomes may be achieved if surgeons use the posterior approach, revise all MoMHA components, and use ≥36 mm ceramic-on-polyethylene or metal-on-polyethylene articulations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6590389
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Taylor and Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65903892019-08-20 No Threshold Exists for Recommending Revision Surgery in Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasty Patients With Adverse Reactions to Metal Debris: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 346 Revisions Matharu, Gulraj S. Berryman, Fiona Dunlop, David J. Revell, Matthew P. Judge, Andrew Murray, David W. Pandit, Hemant G. J Arthroplasty Article BACKGROUND: Surgeons currently have difficulty when managing metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty (MoMHA) patients with adverse reactions to metal debris (ARMD). This stems from a lack of evidence, which is emphasized by the variability in the recommendations proposed by different worldwide regulatory authorities for considering MoMHA revision surgery. We investigated predictors of poor outcomes following MoMHA revision surgery performed for ARMD to help inform the revision threshold and type of reconstruction. METHODS: We retrospectively studied 346 MoMHA revisions for ARMD performed at 2 European centers. Preoperative (metal ions/imaging) and intraoperative (findings, components removed/implanted) factors were used to predict poor outcomes. Poor outcomes were postoperative complications (including re-revision), 90-day mortality, and poor Oxford Hip Score. RESULTS: Poor outcomes occurred in 38.5%. Shorter time (under 4 years) to revision surgery was the only preoperative predictor of poor outcomes (odds ratio [OR] = 2.12, confidence interval [CI] = 1.00-4.46). Prerevision metal ions and imaging did not influence outcomes. Single-component revisions (vs all-component revisions) increased the risk of poor outcomes (OR = 2.99, CI = 1.50-5.97). Intraoperative modifiable factors reducing the risk of poor outcomes included the posterior approach (OR = 0.22, CI = 0.10-0.49), revision head sizes ≥36 mm (vs <36 mm: OR = 0.37, CI = 0.18-0.77), ceramic-on-polyethylene revision bearings (OR vs ceramic-on-ceramic = 0.30, CI = 0.14-0.66), and metal-on-polyethylene revision bearings (OR vs ceramic-on-ceramic = 0.37, CI = 0.17-0.83). CONCLUSION: No threshold exists for recommending revision in MoMHA patients with ARMD. However postrevision outcomes were surgeon modifiable. Optimal outcomes may be achieved if surgeons use the posterior approach, revise all MoMHA components, and use ≥36 mm ceramic-on-polyethylene or metal-on-polyethylene articulations. Taylor and Francis 2019-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6590389/ /pubmed/30992241 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.03.022 Text en © 2019 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Matharu, Gulraj S.
Berryman, Fiona
Dunlop, David J.
Revell, Matthew P.
Judge, Andrew
Murray, David W.
Pandit, Hemant G.
No Threshold Exists for Recommending Revision Surgery in Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasty Patients With Adverse Reactions to Metal Debris: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 346 Revisions
title No Threshold Exists for Recommending Revision Surgery in Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasty Patients With Adverse Reactions to Metal Debris: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 346 Revisions
title_full No Threshold Exists for Recommending Revision Surgery in Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasty Patients With Adverse Reactions to Metal Debris: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 346 Revisions
title_fullStr No Threshold Exists for Recommending Revision Surgery in Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasty Patients With Adverse Reactions to Metal Debris: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 346 Revisions
title_full_unstemmed No Threshold Exists for Recommending Revision Surgery in Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasty Patients With Adverse Reactions to Metal Debris: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 346 Revisions
title_short No Threshold Exists for Recommending Revision Surgery in Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasty Patients With Adverse Reactions to Metal Debris: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 346 Revisions
title_sort no threshold exists for recommending revision surgery in metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty patients with adverse reactions to metal debris: a retrospective cohort study of 346 revisions
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6590389/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30992241
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.03.022
work_keys_str_mv AT matharugulrajs nothresholdexistsforrecommendingrevisionsurgeryinmetalonmetalhiparthroplastypatientswithadversereactionstometaldebrisaretrospectivecohortstudyof346revisions
AT berrymanfiona nothresholdexistsforrecommendingrevisionsurgeryinmetalonmetalhiparthroplastypatientswithadversereactionstometaldebrisaretrospectivecohortstudyof346revisions
AT dunlopdavidj nothresholdexistsforrecommendingrevisionsurgeryinmetalonmetalhiparthroplastypatientswithadversereactionstometaldebrisaretrospectivecohortstudyof346revisions
AT revellmatthewp nothresholdexistsforrecommendingrevisionsurgeryinmetalonmetalhiparthroplastypatientswithadversereactionstometaldebrisaretrospectivecohortstudyof346revisions
AT judgeandrew nothresholdexistsforrecommendingrevisionsurgeryinmetalonmetalhiparthroplastypatientswithadversereactionstometaldebrisaretrospectivecohortstudyof346revisions
AT murraydavidw nothresholdexistsforrecommendingrevisionsurgeryinmetalonmetalhiparthroplastypatientswithadversereactionstometaldebrisaretrospectivecohortstudyof346revisions
AT pandithemantg nothresholdexistsforrecommendingrevisionsurgeryinmetalonmetalhiparthroplastypatientswithadversereactionstometaldebrisaretrospectivecohortstudyof346revisions