Cargando…

Coding strategies in the otolith system differ for translational head motion vs. static orientation relative to gravity

The detection of gravito-inertial forces by the otolith system is essential for our sense of balance and accurate perception. To date, however, how this system encodes the self-motion stimuli that are experienced during everyday activities remains unknown. Here, we addressed this fundamental questio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jamali, Mohsen, Carriot, Jerome, Chacron, Maurice J, Cullen, Kathleen E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6590985/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31199243
http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.45573
_version_ 1783429658983792640
author Jamali, Mohsen
Carriot, Jerome
Chacron, Maurice J
Cullen, Kathleen E
author_facet Jamali, Mohsen
Carriot, Jerome
Chacron, Maurice J
Cullen, Kathleen E
author_sort Jamali, Mohsen
collection PubMed
description The detection of gravito-inertial forces by the otolith system is essential for our sense of balance and accurate perception. To date, however, how this system encodes the self-motion stimuli that are experienced during everyday activities remains unknown. Here, we addressed this fundamental question directly by recording from single otolith afferents in monkeys during naturalistic translational self-motion and changes in static head orientation. Otolith afferents with higher intrinsic variability transmitted more information overall about translational self-motion than their regular counterparts, owing to stronger nonlinearities that enabled precise spike timing including phase locking. By contrast, more regular afferents better discriminated between different static head orientations relative to gravity. Using computational methods, we further demonstrated that coupled increases in intrinsic variability and sensitivity accounted for the observed functional differences between afferent classes. Together, our results indicate that irregular and regular otolith afferents use different strategies to encode naturalistic self-motion and static head orientation relative to gravity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6590985
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65909852019-06-26 Coding strategies in the otolith system differ for translational head motion vs. static orientation relative to gravity Jamali, Mohsen Carriot, Jerome Chacron, Maurice J Cullen, Kathleen E eLife Neuroscience The detection of gravito-inertial forces by the otolith system is essential for our sense of balance and accurate perception. To date, however, how this system encodes the self-motion stimuli that are experienced during everyday activities remains unknown. Here, we addressed this fundamental question directly by recording from single otolith afferents in monkeys during naturalistic translational self-motion and changes in static head orientation. Otolith afferents with higher intrinsic variability transmitted more information overall about translational self-motion than their regular counterparts, owing to stronger nonlinearities that enabled precise spike timing including phase locking. By contrast, more regular afferents better discriminated between different static head orientations relative to gravity. Using computational methods, we further demonstrated that coupled increases in intrinsic variability and sensitivity accounted for the observed functional differences between afferent classes. Together, our results indicate that irregular and regular otolith afferents use different strategies to encode naturalistic self-motion and static head orientation relative to gravity. eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd 2019-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6590985/ /pubmed/31199243 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.45573 Text en © 2019, Jamali et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Jamali, Mohsen
Carriot, Jerome
Chacron, Maurice J
Cullen, Kathleen E
Coding strategies in the otolith system differ for translational head motion vs. static orientation relative to gravity
title Coding strategies in the otolith system differ for translational head motion vs. static orientation relative to gravity
title_full Coding strategies in the otolith system differ for translational head motion vs. static orientation relative to gravity
title_fullStr Coding strategies in the otolith system differ for translational head motion vs. static orientation relative to gravity
title_full_unstemmed Coding strategies in the otolith system differ for translational head motion vs. static orientation relative to gravity
title_short Coding strategies in the otolith system differ for translational head motion vs. static orientation relative to gravity
title_sort coding strategies in the otolith system differ for translational head motion vs. static orientation relative to gravity
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6590985/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31199243
http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.45573
work_keys_str_mv AT jamalimohsen codingstrategiesintheotolithsystemdifferfortranslationalheadmotionvsstaticorientationrelativetogravity
AT carriotjerome codingstrategiesintheotolithsystemdifferfortranslationalheadmotionvsstaticorientationrelativetogravity
AT chacronmauricej codingstrategiesintheotolithsystemdifferfortranslationalheadmotionvsstaticorientationrelativetogravity
AT cullenkathleene codingstrategiesintheotolithsystemdifferfortranslationalheadmotionvsstaticorientationrelativetogravity