Cargando…
Coding strategies in the otolith system differ for translational head motion vs. static orientation relative to gravity
The detection of gravito-inertial forces by the otolith system is essential for our sense of balance and accurate perception. To date, however, how this system encodes the self-motion stimuli that are experienced during everyday activities remains unknown. Here, we addressed this fundamental questio...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6590985/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31199243 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.45573 |
_version_ | 1783429658983792640 |
---|---|
author | Jamali, Mohsen Carriot, Jerome Chacron, Maurice J Cullen, Kathleen E |
author_facet | Jamali, Mohsen Carriot, Jerome Chacron, Maurice J Cullen, Kathleen E |
author_sort | Jamali, Mohsen |
collection | PubMed |
description | The detection of gravito-inertial forces by the otolith system is essential for our sense of balance and accurate perception. To date, however, how this system encodes the self-motion stimuli that are experienced during everyday activities remains unknown. Here, we addressed this fundamental question directly by recording from single otolith afferents in monkeys during naturalistic translational self-motion and changes in static head orientation. Otolith afferents with higher intrinsic variability transmitted more information overall about translational self-motion than their regular counterparts, owing to stronger nonlinearities that enabled precise spike timing including phase locking. By contrast, more regular afferents better discriminated between different static head orientations relative to gravity. Using computational methods, we further demonstrated that coupled increases in intrinsic variability and sensitivity accounted for the observed functional differences between afferent classes. Together, our results indicate that irregular and regular otolith afferents use different strategies to encode naturalistic self-motion and static head orientation relative to gravity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6590985 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65909852019-06-26 Coding strategies in the otolith system differ for translational head motion vs. static orientation relative to gravity Jamali, Mohsen Carriot, Jerome Chacron, Maurice J Cullen, Kathleen E eLife Neuroscience The detection of gravito-inertial forces by the otolith system is essential for our sense of balance and accurate perception. To date, however, how this system encodes the self-motion stimuli that are experienced during everyday activities remains unknown. Here, we addressed this fundamental question directly by recording from single otolith afferents in monkeys during naturalistic translational self-motion and changes in static head orientation. Otolith afferents with higher intrinsic variability transmitted more information overall about translational self-motion than their regular counterparts, owing to stronger nonlinearities that enabled precise spike timing including phase locking. By contrast, more regular afferents better discriminated between different static head orientations relative to gravity. Using computational methods, we further demonstrated that coupled increases in intrinsic variability and sensitivity accounted for the observed functional differences between afferent classes. Together, our results indicate that irregular and regular otolith afferents use different strategies to encode naturalistic self-motion and static head orientation relative to gravity. eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd 2019-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6590985/ /pubmed/31199243 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.45573 Text en © 2019, Jamali et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Jamali, Mohsen Carriot, Jerome Chacron, Maurice J Cullen, Kathleen E Coding strategies in the otolith system differ for translational head motion vs. static orientation relative to gravity |
title | Coding strategies in the otolith system differ for translational head motion vs. static orientation relative to gravity |
title_full | Coding strategies in the otolith system differ for translational head motion vs. static orientation relative to gravity |
title_fullStr | Coding strategies in the otolith system differ for translational head motion vs. static orientation relative to gravity |
title_full_unstemmed | Coding strategies in the otolith system differ for translational head motion vs. static orientation relative to gravity |
title_short | Coding strategies in the otolith system differ for translational head motion vs. static orientation relative to gravity |
title_sort | coding strategies in the otolith system differ for translational head motion vs. static orientation relative to gravity |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6590985/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31199243 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.45573 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jamalimohsen codingstrategiesintheotolithsystemdifferfortranslationalheadmotionvsstaticorientationrelativetogravity AT carriotjerome codingstrategiesintheotolithsystemdifferfortranslationalheadmotionvsstaticorientationrelativetogravity AT chacronmauricej codingstrategiesintheotolithsystemdifferfortranslationalheadmotionvsstaticorientationrelativetogravity AT cullenkathleene codingstrategiesintheotolithsystemdifferfortranslationalheadmotionvsstaticorientationrelativetogravity |