Cargando…

Tobacco smoking and dopaminergic function in humans: a meta-analysis of molecular imaging studies

RATIONALE: About 1.1 billion people smoke tobacco globally and tobacco-related health care costs 1.8% of GDP in many countries. The majority of people are unable to quit smoking despite pharmacological intervention, highlighting the need to understand the pathophysiology associated with tobacco smok...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ashok, Abhishekh H., Mizuno, Yuya, Howes, Oliver D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6591186/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30887059
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00213-019-05196-1
Descripción
Sumario:RATIONALE: About 1.1 billion people smoke tobacco globally and tobacco-related health care costs 1.8% of GDP in many countries. The majority of people are unable to quit smoking despite pharmacological intervention, highlighting the need to understand the pathophysiology associated with tobacco smoking to aid the development of new therapeutics. The reinforcing effects of tobacco smoking are thought to be mediated by the dopamine system. However, the nature of dopamine dysfunction seen in smokers is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To determine the nature and robustness of the evidence for dopaminergic alterations in smokers. METHODS: The entire MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsycINFO databases were searched for studies from inception date to November 18, 2018. In vivo human molecular imaging studies of dopamine measures (dopamine synthesis or release capacity, transporter levels, receptor levels) in tobacco smokers were selected. Demographic, clinical, and imaging measures were extracted from each study and meta-analyses, and sensitivity analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Fourteen studies met inclusion criteria comprising a total sample of 219 tobacco smokers and 297 controls. The meta-analysis showed a significant reduction in dopamine transporter availability in the smokers relative to controls with an effect size of − 0.72 ([95% CI, − 1.38 to − 0.05], p = 0.03). However, there was no difference in D2/3 receptor availability in smokers relative to controls (d = −0.16 ([95% CI, − 0.42 to 0.1], p = 0.23). There were insufficient studies for meta-analysis of other measures. However, findings from the published studies indicated blunted dopamine release and lower D1 receptor availability, while findings for dopamine synthesis capacity were inconsistent. CONCLUSION: Our data indicate that striatal dopamine transporter availability is lower but D2/3 receptors are unaltered in smokers relative to controls. We discuss the putative mechanisms underlying this and their implications. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00213-019-05196-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.