Cargando…
An Effective Meta-analysis of Magnetic Stimulation Therapy for Urinary Incontinence
Magnetic stimulation (MS) is a novel approach for treating urinary incontinence (UI), but its applicability remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to evaluate the effects of MS treatment on UI. A literature search was performed in EMBASE, PubMed and Cochrane Library...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6591355/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31235706 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-45330-9 |
_version_ | 1783429712549249024 |
---|---|
author | He, Qing Xiao, Kaiwen Peng, Liao Lai, Junyu Li, Hong Luo, Deyi Wang, Kunjie |
author_facet | He, Qing Xiao, Kaiwen Peng, Liao Lai, Junyu Li, Hong Luo, Deyi Wang, Kunjie |
author_sort | He, Qing |
collection | PubMed |
description | Magnetic stimulation (MS) is a novel approach for treating urinary incontinence (UI), but its applicability remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to evaluate the effects of MS treatment on UI. A literature search was performed in EMBASE, PubMed and Cochrane Library (from May 2018 to August 2018), and all randomized control trials (RCTs) published in English were screened to determine whether they met the inclusion criteria. A manual search of the reference lists of the retrieved studies was also performed. Eleven studies involving 612 patients were included in this review. According to the results of the meta-analysis, MS therapy relieved UI symptoms evaluated using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF) score (mean difference [MD] −3.03, 95% CI −3.27 to −2.79). In addition, the frequency of UI in the MS treatment group was also alleviated compared with sham group (MD −1.42, 95% CI −2.15 to −0.69). Finally, MS treatment improved the quality of life of patients with UI (standardized mean difference [SMD] −1.00, 95% CI −1.24 to −0.76). Our meta-analysis preliminarily indicates that MS treatment is an effective therapeutic modality for patients with UI. Nevertheless, additional large, high quality RCTs with a longer follow-up period that use consistent stimulation methods and analyse comparable outcomes are required to validate the efficacy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6591355 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65913552019-07-02 An Effective Meta-analysis of Magnetic Stimulation Therapy for Urinary Incontinence He, Qing Xiao, Kaiwen Peng, Liao Lai, Junyu Li, Hong Luo, Deyi Wang, Kunjie Sci Rep Article Magnetic stimulation (MS) is a novel approach for treating urinary incontinence (UI), but its applicability remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to evaluate the effects of MS treatment on UI. A literature search was performed in EMBASE, PubMed and Cochrane Library (from May 2018 to August 2018), and all randomized control trials (RCTs) published in English were screened to determine whether they met the inclusion criteria. A manual search of the reference lists of the retrieved studies was also performed. Eleven studies involving 612 patients were included in this review. According to the results of the meta-analysis, MS therapy relieved UI symptoms evaluated using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF) score (mean difference [MD] −3.03, 95% CI −3.27 to −2.79). In addition, the frequency of UI in the MS treatment group was also alleviated compared with sham group (MD −1.42, 95% CI −2.15 to −0.69). Finally, MS treatment improved the quality of life of patients with UI (standardized mean difference [SMD] −1.00, 95% CI −1.24 to −0.76). Our meta-analysis preliminarily indicates that MS treatment is an effective therapeutic modality for patients with UI. Nevertheless, additional large, high quality RCTs with a longer follow-up period that use consistent stimulation methods and analyse comparable outcomes are required to validate the efficacy. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6591355/ /pubmed/31235706 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-45330-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article He, Qing Xiao, Kaiwen Peng, Liao Lai, Junyu Li, Hong Luo, Deyi Wang, Kunjie An Effective Meta-analysis of Magnetic Stimulation Therapy for Urinary Incontinence |
title | An Effective Meta-analysis of Magnetic Stimulation Therapy for Urinary Incontinence |
title_full | An Effective Meta-analysis of Magnetic Stimulation Therapy for Urinary Incontinence |
title_fullStr | An Effective Meta-analysis of Magnetic Stimulation Therapy for Urinary Incontinence |
title_full_unstemmed | An Effective Meta-analysis of Magnetic Stimulation Therapy for Urinary Incontinence |
title_short | An Effective Meta-analysis of Magnetic Stimulation Therapy for Urinary Incontinence |
title_sort | effective meta-analysis of magnetic stimulation therapy for urinary incontinence |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6591355/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31235706 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-45330-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT heqing aneffectivemetaanalysisofmagneticstimulationtherapyforurinaryincontinence AT xiaokaiwen aneffectivemetaanalysisofmagneticstimulationtherapyforurinaryincontinence AT pengliao aneffectivemetaanalysisofmagneticstimulationtherapyforurinaryincontinence AT laijunyu aneffectivemetaanalysisofmagneticstimulationtherapyforurinaryincontinence AT lihong aneffectivemetaanalysisofmagneticstimulationtherapyforurinaryincontinence AT luodeyi aneffectivemetaanalysisofmagneticstimulationtherapyforurinaryincontinence AT wangkunjie aneffectivemetaanalysisofmagneticstimulationtherapyforurinaryincontinence AT heqing effectivemetaanalysisofmagneticstimulationtherapyforurinaryincontinence AT xiaokaiwen effectivemetaanalysisofmagneticstimulationtherapyforurinaryincontinence AT pengliao effectivemetaanalysisofmagneticstimulationtherapyforurinaryincontinence AT laijunyu effectivemetaanalysisofmagneticstimulationtherapyforurinaryincontinence AT lihong effectivemetaanalysisofmagneticstimulationtherapyforurinaryincontinence AT luodeyi effectivemetaanalysisofmagneticstimulationtherapyforurinaryincontinence AT wangkunjie effectivemetaanalysisofmagneticstimulationtherapyforurinaryincontinence |