Cargando…

An Effective Meta-analysis of Magnetic Stimulation Therapy for Urinary Incontinence

Magnetic stimulation (MS) is a novel approach for treating urinary incontinence (UI), but its applicability remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to evaluate the effects of MS treatment on UI. A literature search was performed in EMBASE, PubMed and Cochrane Library...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: He, Qing, Xiao, Kaiwen, Peng, Liao, Lai, Junyu, Li, Hong, Luo, Deyi, Wang, Kunjie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6591355/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31235706
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-45330-9
_version_ 1783429712549249024
author He, Qing
Xiao, Kaiwen
Peng, Liao
Lai, Junyu
Li, Hong
Luo, Deyi
Wang, Kunjie
author_facet He, Qing
Xiao, Kaiwen
Peng, Liao
Lai, Junyu
Li, Hong
Luo, Deyi
Wang, Kunjie
author_sort He, Qing
collection PubMed
description Magnetic stimulation (MS) is a novel approach for treating urinary incontinence (UI), but its applicability remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to evaluate the effects of MS treatment on UI. A literature search was performed in EMBASE, PubMed and Cochrane Library (from May 2018 to August 2018), and all randomized control trials (RCTs) published in English were screened to determine whether they met the inclusion criteria. A manual search of the reference lists of the retrieved studies was also performed. Eleven studies involving 612 patients were included in this review. According to the results of the meta-analysis, MS therapy relieved UI symptoms evaluated using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF) score (mean difference [MD] −3.03, 95% CI −3.27 to −2.79). In addition, the frequency of UI in the MS treatment group was also alleviated compared with sham group (MD −1.42, 95% CI −2.15 to −0.69). Finally, MS treatment improved the quality of life of patients with UI (standardized mean difference [SMD] −1.00, 95% CI −1.24 to −0.76). Our meta-analysis preliminarily indicates that MS treatment is an effective therapeutic modality for patients with UI. Nevertheless, additional large, high quality RCTs with a longer follow-up period that use consistent stimulation methods and analyse comparable outcomes are required to validate the efficacy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6591355
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65913552019-07-02 An Effective Meta-analysis of Magnetic Stimulation Therapy for Urinary Incontinence He, Qing Xiao, Kaiwen Peng, Liao Lai, Junyu Li, Hong Luo, Deyi Wang, Kunjie Sci Rep Article Magnetic stimulation (MS) is a novel approach for treating urinary incontinence (UI), but its applicability remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to evaluate the effects of MS treatment on UI. A literature search was performed in EMBASE, PubMed and Cochrane Library (from May 2018 to August 2018), and all randomized control trials (RCTs) published in English were screened to determine whether they met the inclusion criteria. A manual search of the reference lists of the retrieved studies was also performed. Eleven studies involving 612 patients were included in this review. According to the results of the meta-analysis, MS therapy relieved UI symptoms evaluated using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF) score (mean difference [MD] −3.03, 95% CI −3.27 to −2.79). In addition, the frequency of UI in the MS treatment group was also alleviated compared with sham group (MD −1.42, 95% CI −2.15 to −0.69). Finally, MS treatment improved the quality of life of patients with UI (standardized mean difference [SMD] −1.00, 95% CI −1.24 to −0.76). Our meta-analysis preliminarily indicates that MS treatment is an effective therapeutic modality for patients with UI. Nevertheless, additional large, high quality RCTs with a longer follow-up period that use consistent stimulation methods and analyse comparable outcomes are required to validate the efficacy. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6591355/ /pubmed/31235706 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-45330-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
He, Qing
Xiao, Kaiwen
Peng, Liao
Lai, Junyu
Li, Hong
Luo, Deyi
Wang, Kunjie
An Effective Meta-analysis of Magnetic Stimulation Therapy for Urinary Incontinence
title An Effective Meta-analysis of Magnetic Stimulation Therapy for Urinary Incontinence
title_full An Effective Meta-analysis of Magnetic Stimulation Therapy for Urinary Incontinence
title_fullStr An Effective Meta-analysis of Magnetic Stimulation Therapy for Urinary Incontinence
title_full_unstemmed An Effective Meta-analysis of Magnetic Stimulation Therapy for Urinary Incontinence
title_short An Effective Meta-analysis of Magnetic Stimulation Therapy for Urinary Incontinence
title_sort effective meta-analysis of magnetic stimulation therapy for urinary incontinence
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6591355/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31235706
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-45330-9
work_keys_str_mv AT heqing aneffectivemetaanalysisofmagneticstimulationtherapyforurinaryincontinence
AT xiaokaiwen aneffectivemetaanalysisofmagneticstimulationtherapyforurinaryincontinence
AT pengliao aneffectivemetaanalysisofmagneticstimulationtherapyforurinaryincontinence
AT laijunyu aneffectivemetaanalysisofmagneticstimulationtherapyforurinaryincontinence
AT lihong aneffectivemetaanalysisofmagneticstimulationtherapyforurinaryincontinence
AT luodeyi aneffectivemetaanalysisofmagneticstimulationtherapyforurinaryincontinence
AT wangkunjie aneffectivemetaanalysisofmagneticstimulationtherapyforurinaryincontinence
AT heqing effectivemetaanalysisofmagneticstimulationtherapyforurinaryincontinence
AT xiaokaiwen effectivemetaanalysisofmagneticstimulationtherapyforurinaryincontinence
AT pengliao effectivemetaanalysisofmagneticstimulationtherapyforurinaryincontinence
AT laijunyu effectivemetaanalysisofmagneticstimulationtherapyforurinaryincontinence
AT lihong effectivemetaanalysisofmagneticstimulationtherapyforurinaryincontinence
AT luodeyi effectivemetaanalysisofmagneticstimulationtherapyforurinaryincontinence
AT wangkunjie effectivemetaanalysisofmagneticstimulationtherapyforurinaryincontinence