Cargando…
A comparison of a novel endoscopic “Su-Wang technique” with the open “Jaboulay’s procedure” for the surgical treatment of adult primary vaginal hydrocele
This paper was aimed to introduce and compare outcomes of a novel “Su-Wang (S-W) technique” for endoscopic treatment of adult hydrocele with conventional open hydrocelectomy with “Jaboulay’s (JA) procedure” regarding adverse events (AEs) and patient satisfaction. In the randomized controlled trial,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6591509/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31235709 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-45229-5 |
_version_ | 1783429747082002432 |
---|---|
author | Lei, Junhao Luo, Chunhua Zhang, Yangyang Guo, Yuming Su, Xinjun Wang, Xinghuan |
author_facet | Lei, Junhao Luo, Chunhua Zhang, Yangyang Guo, Yuming Su, Xinjun Wang, Xinghuan |
author_sort | Lei, Junhao |
collection | PubMed |
description | This paper was aimed to introduce and compare outcomes of a novel “Su-Wang (S-W) technique” for endoscopic treatment of adult hydrocele with conventional open hydrocelectomy with “Jaboulay’s (JA) procedure” regarding adverse events (AEs) and patient satisfaction. In the randomized controlled trial, adult males with primary hydroceles were prospectively assigned into S-W or JA group. We recorded perioperative data and postoperative AEs (incision length, recurrence, hematoma, wound infection and edema vanished time). Finally, a total of 42 adult patients underwent the S-W (n = 22) or JA (n = 20) procedure. Procedures were successfully completed for all 42 patients. No significant differences were found between the two groups regarding age, symptom duration, body mass index, and size of the hydrocele. The incision length was significantly shorter in the S-W group (1.00 ± 0.24 cm) than in the JA group (6.10 ± 1.46 cm). After 6 months’ follow-up, complete data of 90.5% (38/42) were obtained. Severe AEs did not occur in any patient. Recurrence, hematoma, wound infection, edema vanished time values, and satisfaction in the S-W group were superior to those in the JA group. All patients in the S-W group were satisfied with this novel procedure, particularly due to the minimally invasive incision. In conclusion, the novel “S-W technique” for hydrocelectomy provided satisfactory cosmetic results with a 1-cm scrotal incision only. With the near-complete excision of the parietal TV, it resulted in no recurrence, fewer AEs, and rapid postoperative rehabilitation in comparison to the traditional “JA procedure.” The endoscopic “S-W technique” may be a viable alternative for the surgical treatment of adult primary vaginal hydrocele. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6591509 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65915092019-07-03 A comparison of a novel endoscopic “Su-Wang technique” with the open “Jaboulay’s procedure” for the surgical treatment of adult primary vaginal hydrocele Lei, Junhao Luo, Chunhua Zhang, Yangyang Guo, Yuming Su, Xinjun Wang, Xinghuan Sci Rep Article This paper was aimed to introduce and compare outcomes of a novel “Su-Wang (S-W) technique” for endoscopic treatment of adult hydrocele with conventional open hydrocelectomy with “Jaboulay’s (JA) procedure” regarding adverse events (AEs) and patient satisfaction. In the randomized controlled trial, adult males with primary hydroceles were prospectively assigned into S-W or JA group. We recorded perioperative data and postoperative AEs (incision length, recurrence, hematoma, wound infection and edema vanished time). Finally, a total of 42 adult patients underwent the S-W (n = 22) or JA (n = 20) procedure. Procedures were successfully completed for all 42 patients. No significant differences were found between the two groups regarding age, symptom duration, body mass index, and size of the hydrocele. The incision length was significantly shorter in the S-W group (1.00 ± 0.24 cm) than in the JA group (6.10 ± 1.46 cm). After 6 months’ follow-up, complete data of 90.5% (38/42) were obtained. Severe AEs did not occur in any patient. Recurrence, hematoma, wound infection, edema vanished time values, and satisfaction in the S-W group were superior to those in the JA group. All patients in the S-W group were satisfied with this novel procedure, particularly due to the minimally invasive incision. In conclusion, the novel “S-W technique” for hydrocelectomy provided satisfactory cosmetic results with a 1-cm scrotal incision only. With the near-complete excision of the parietal TV, it resulted in no recurrence, fewer AEs, and rapid postoperative rehabilitation in comparison to the traditional “JA procedure.” The endoscopic “S-W technique” may be a viable alternative for the surgical treatment of adult primary vaginal hydrocele. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6591509/ /pubmed/31235709 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-45229-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Lei, Junhao Luo, Chunhua Zhang, Yangyang Guo, Yuming Su, Xinjun Wang, Xinghuan A comparison of a novel endoscopic “Su-Wang technique” with the open “Jaboulay’s procedure” for the surgical treatment of adult primary vaginal hydrocele |
title | A comparison of a novel endoscopic “Su-Wang technique” with the open “Jaboulay’s procedure” for the surgical treatment of adult primary vaginal hydrocele |
title_full | A comparison of a novel endoscopic “Su-Wang technique” with the open “Jaboulay’s procedure” for the surgical treatment of adult primary vaginal hydrocele |
title_fullStr | A comparison of a novel endoscopic “Su-Wang technique” with the open “Jaboulay’s procedure” for the surgical treatment of adult primary vaginal hydrocele |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparison of a novel endoscopic “Su-Wang technique” with the open “Jaboulay’s procedure” for the surgical treatment of adult primary vaginal hydrocele |
title_short | A comparison of a novel endoscopic “Su-Wang technique” with the open “Jaboulay’s procedure” for the surgical treatment of adult primary vaginal hydrocele |
title_sort | comparison of a novel endoscopic “su-wang technique” with the open “jaboulay’s procedure” for the surgical treatment of adult primary vaginal hydrocele |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6591509/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31235709 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-45229-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leijunhao acomparisonofanovelendoscopicsuwangtechniquewiththeopenjaboulaysprocedureforthesurgicaltreatmentofadultprimaryvaginalhydrocele AT luochunhua acomparisonofanovelendoscopicsuwangtechniquewiththeopenjaboulaysprocedureforthesurgicaltreatmentofadultprimaryvaginalhydrocele AT zhangyangyang acomparisonofanovelendoscopicsuwangtechniquewiththeopenjaboulaysprocedureforthesurgicaltreatmentofadultprimaryvaginalhydrocele AT guoyuming acomparisonofanovelendoscopicsuwangtechniquewiththeopenjaboulaysprocedureforthesurgicaltreatmentofadultprimaryvaginalhydrocele AT suxinjun acomparisonofanovelendoscopicsuwangtechniquewiththeopenjaboulaysprocedureforthesurgicaltreatmentofadultprimaryvaginalhydrocele AT wangxinghuan acomparisonofanovelendoscopicsuwangtechniquewiththeopenjaboulaysprocedureforthesurgicaltreatmentofadultprimaryvaginalhydrocele AT leijunhao comparisonofanovelendoscopicsuwangtechniquewiththeopenjaboulaysprocedureforthesurgicaltreatmentofadultprimaryvaginalhydrocele AT luochunhua comparisonofanovelendoscopicsuwangtechniquewiththeopenjaboulaysprocedureforthesurgicaltreatmentofadultprimaryvaginalhydrocele AT zhangyangyang comparisonofanovelendoscopicsuwangtechniquewiththeopenjaboulaysprocedureforthesurgicaltreatmentofadultprimaryvaginalhydrocele AT guoyuming comparisonofanovelendoscopicsuwangtechniquewiththeopenjaboulaysprocedureforthesurgicaltreatmentofadultprimaryvaginalhydrocele AT suxinjun comparisonofanovelendoscopicsuwangtechniquewiththeopenjaboulaysprocedureforthesurgicaltreatmentofadultprimaryvaginalhydrocele AT wangxinghuan comparisonofanovelendoscopicsuwangtechniquewiththeopenjaboulaysprocedureforthesurgicaltreatmentofadultprimaryvaginalhydrocele |