Cargando…

Evaluating 18s-rRNA LAMP and selective whole genome amplification (sWGA) assay in detecting asymptomatic Plasmodium falciparum infections in blood donors

BACKGROUND: Undesirable consequences of donor Plasmodium falciparum parasitaemia on stored donor blood have been reported. Therefore, it is imperative that all prospective blood donors are screened for P. falciparum infections using sensitive techniques. In this study, the sensitivities of microscop...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aninagyei, Enoch, Smith-Graham, Stella, Boye, Alex, Egyir-Yawson, Alexander, Acheampong, Desmond Omane
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6591871/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31234871
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-019-2850-7
_version_ 1783429797115854848
author Aninagyei, Enoch
Smith-Graham, Stella
Boye, Alex
Egyir-Yawson, Alexander
Acheampong, Desmond Omane
author_facet Aninagyei, Enoch
Smith-Graham, Stella
Boye, Alex
Egyir-Yawson, Alexander
Acheampong, Desmond Omane
author_sort Aninagyei, Enoch
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Undesirable consequences of donor Plasmodium falciparum parasitaemia on stored donor blood have been reported. Therefore, it is imperative that all prospective blood donors are screened for P. falciparum infections using sensitive techniques. In this study, the sensitivities of microscopy, rapid diagnostic test (RDT), loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay and selective whole genome amplification (sWGA) technique in detecting P. falciparum infections in blood donors was assessed. METHODS: Randomly selected blood donors from 5 districts in Greater Accra Region of Ghana were screened for asymptomatic P. falciparum infections. Each donor sample was screened with SD Bioline RDT kit for P. falciparum histidine rich protein 2 and Plasmodium lactate dehydrogenase antigens, sWGA and 18s-rRNA LAMP. Crude DNA LAMP (crDNA-LAMP) was compared to purified DNA LAMP (pDNA-LAMP). RESULTS: A total of 771 blood donors were screened. The respective overall prevalence of P. falciparum in Ghana by microscopy, RDT, crDNA-LAMP, pDNA-LAMP and sWGA was 7.4%, 11.8%, 16.9%, 17.5% and 18.0%. Using sWGA as the reference test, the sensitivities of microscopy, RDT, crDNA-LAMP and pDNA-LAMP were 41.0% (95% CI 32.7–49.7), 65.5% (95% CI 56.9–73.3), 82.6% (95% CI 75.8–88.3) and 95.7% (95% CI 90.1–98.4), respectively. There was near perfect agreement between LAMP and sWGA (sWGA vs. crDNA-LAMP, κ = 0.87; sWGA vs. pDNA-LAMP, κ = 0.96), while crDNA-LAMP and pDNA-LAMP agreed perfectly (κ = 0.91). Goodness of fit test indicated non-significant difference between the performance of LAMP and sWGA (crDNA-LAMP vs. sWGA: x(2) = 0.71, p = 0.399 and pDNA-LAMP vs. sWGA: x(2) = 0.14, p = 0.707). Finally, compared to sWGA, the performance of LAMP did not differ in detecting sub-microscopic parasitaemia (sWGA vs. crDNA-LAMP: x(2) = 1.12, p = 0.290 and sWGA vs. pDNA-LAMP: x(2) = 0.22, p = 0.638). CONCLUSIONS: LAMP assay agreed near perfectly with sWGA with non-significant differences in their ability to detect asymptomatic P. falciparum parasitaemia in blood donors. Therefore, it is recommended that LAMP based assays are employed to detect P. falciparum infections in blood donors due to its high sensitivity, simplicity, cost-effectiveness and user-friendliness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6591871
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65918712019-07-08 Evaluating 18s-rRNA LAMP and selective whole genome amplification (sWGA) assay in detecting asymptomatic Plasmodium falciparum infections in blood donors Aninagyei, Enoch Smith-Graham, Stella Boye, Alex Egyir-Yawson, Alexander Acheampong, Desmond Omane Malar J Research BACKGROUND: Undesirable consequences of donor Plasmodium falciparum parasitaemia on stored donor blood have been reported. Therefore, it is imperative that all prospective blood donors are screened for P. falciparum infections using sensitive techniques. In this study, the sensitivities of microscopy, rapid diagnostic test (RDT), loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay and selective whole genome amplification (sWGA) technique in detecting P. falciparum infections in blood donors was assessed. METHODS: Randomly selected blood donors from 5 districts in Greater Accra Region of Ghana were screened for asymptomatic P. falciparum infections. Each donor sample was screened with SD Bioline RDT kit for P. falciparum histidine rich protein 2 and Plasmodium lactate dehydrogenase antigens, sWGA and 18s-rRNA LAMP. Crude DNA LAMP (crDNA-LAMP) was compared to purified DNA LAMP (pDNA-LAMP). RESULTS: A total of 771 blood donors were screened. The respective overall prevalence of P. falciparum in Ghana by microscopy, RDT, crDNA-LAMP, pDNA-LAMP and sWGA was 7.4%, 11.8%, 16.9%, 17.5% and 18.0%. Using sWGA as the reference test, the sensitivities of microscopy, RDT, crDNA-LAMP and pDNA-LAMP were 41.0% (95% CI 32.7–49.7), 65.5% (95% CI 56.9–73.3), 82.6% (95% CI 75.8–88.3) and 95.7% (95% CI 90.1–98.4), respectively. There was near perfect agreement between LAMP and sWGA (sWGA vs. crDNA-LAMP, κ = 0.87; sWGA vs. pDNA-LAMP, κ = 0.96), while crDNA-LAMP and pDNA-LAMP agreed perfectly (κ = 0.91). Goodness of fit test indicated non-significant difference between the performance of LAMP and sWGA (crDNA-LAMP vs. sWGA: x(2) = 0.71, p = 0.399 and pDNA-LAMP vs. sWGA: x(2) = 0.14, p = 0.707). Finally, compared to sWGA, the performance of LAMP did not differ in detecting sub-microscopic parasitaemia (sWGA vs. crDNA-LAMP: x(2) = 1.12, p = 0.290 and sWGA vs. pDNA-LAMP: x(2) = 0.22, p = 0.638). CONCLUSIONS: LAMP assay agreed near perfectly with sWGA with non-significant differences in their ability to detect asymptomatic P. falciparum parasitaemia in blood donors. Therefore, it is recommended that LAMP based assays are employed to detect P. falciparum infections in blood donors due to its high sensitivity, simplicity, cost-effectiveness and user-friendliness. BioMed Central 2019-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6591871/ /pubmed/31234871 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-019-2850-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Aninagyei, Enoch
Smith-Graham, Stella
Boye, Alex
Egyir-Yawson, Alexander
Acheampong, Desmond Omane
Evaluating 18s-rRNA LAMP and selective whole genome amplification (sWGA) assay in detecting asymptomatic Plasmodium falciparum infections in blood donors
title Evaluating 18s-rRNA LAMP and selective whole genome amplification (sWGA) assay in detecting asymptomatic Plasmodium falciparum infections in blood donors
title_full Evaluating 18s-rRNA LAMP and selective whole genome amplification (sWGA) assay in detecting asymptomatic Plasmodium falciparum infections in blood donors
title_fullStr Evaluating 18s-rRNA LAMP and selective whole genome amplification (sWGA) assay in detecting asymptomatic Plasmodium falciparum infections in blood donors
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating 18s-rRNA LAMP and selective whole genome amplification (sWGA) assay in detecting asymptomatic Plasmodium falciparum infections in blood donors
title_short Evaluating 18s-rRNA LAMP and selective whole genome amplification (sWGA) assay in detecting asymptomatic Plasmodium falciparum infections in blood donors
title_sort evaluating 18s-rrna lamp and selective whole genome amplification (swga) assay in detecting asymptomatic plasmodium falciparum infections in blood donors
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6591871/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31234871
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-019-2850-7
work_keys_str_mv AT aninagyeienoch evaluating18srrnalampandselectivewholegenomeamplificationswgaassayindetectingasymptomaticplasmodiumfalciparuminfectionsinblooddonors
AT smithgrahamstella evaluating18srrnalampandselectivewholegenomeamplificationswgaassayindetectingasymptomaticplasmodiumfalciparuminfectionsinblooddonors
AT boyealex evaluating18srrnalampandselectivewholegenomeamplificationswgaassayindetectingasymptomaticplasmodiumfalciparuminfectionsinblooddonors
AT egyiryawsonalexander evaluating18srrnalampandselectivewholegenomeamplificationswgaassayindetectingasymptomaticplasmodiumfalciparuminfectionsinblooddonors
AT acheampongdesmondomane evaluating18srrnalampandselectivewholegenomeamplificationswgaassayindetectingasymptomaticplasmodiumfalciparuminfectionsinblooddonors