Cargando…
Skill-mix change in general practice: a qualitative comparison of three ‘new’ non-medical roles in English primary care
BACKGROUND: General practice is currently facing a significant workforce challenge. Changing the general practice skill mix by introducing new non-medical roles is recommended as one solution; the literature highlights that organisational and/or operational difficulties are associated with skill-mix...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Royal College of General Practitioners
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6592332/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31160367 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgp19X704117 |
_version_ | 1783429875717111808 |
---|---|
author | Nelson, Pauline A Bradley, Fay Martindale, Anne-Marie McBride, Anne Hodgson, Damian |
author_facet | Nelson, Pauline A Bradley, Fay Martindale, Anne-Marie McBride, Anne Hodgson, Damian |
author_sort | Nelson, Pauline A |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: General practice is currently facing a significant workforce challenge. Changing the general practice skill mix by introducing new non-medical roles is recommended as one solution; the literature highlights that organisational and/or operational difficulties are associated with skill-mix changes. AIM: To compare how three non-medical roles were being established in general practice, understand common implementation barriers, and identify measurable impacts or unintended consequences. DESIGN AND SETTING: In-depth qualitative comparison of three role initiatives in general practices in one area of Greater Manchester, England; that is, advanced practitioner and physician associate training schemes, and a locally commissioned practice pharmacist service. METHOD: Semi-structured interviews and focus groups with a purposive sample of stakeholders involved in the implementation of each role initiative were conducted. Template analysis enabled the production of pre-determined and researcher-generated codes, categories, and themes. RESULTS: The final sample contained 38 stakeholders comprising training/service leads, role holders, and host practice staff. Three key themes captured participants’ perspectives: purpose and place of new roles in general practice, involving unclear role definition and tension at professional boundaries; transition of new roles into general practice, involving risk management, closing training–practice gaps and managing expectations; and future of new roles in general practice, involving demonstrating impact and questions about sustainability. CONCLUSION: This in-depth, in-context comparative study highlights that introducing new roles to general practice is not a simple process. Recognition of factors affecting the assimilation of roles may help to better align them with the goals of general practice and harness the commitment of individual practices to enable role sustainability. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6592332 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Royal College of General Practitioners |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65923322019-07-11 Skill-mix change in general practice: a qualitative comparison of three ‘new’ non-medical roles in English primary care Nelson, Pauline A Bradley, Fay Martindale, Anne-Marie McBride, Anne Hodgson, Damian Br J Gen Pract Research BACKGROUND: General practice is currently facing a significant workforce challenge. Changing the general practice skill mix by introducing new non-medical roles is recommended as one solution; the literature highlights that organisational and/or operational difficulties are associated with skill-mix changes. AIM: To compare how three non-medical roles were being established in general practice, understand common implementation barriers, and identify measurable impacts or unintended consequences. DESIGN AND SETTING: In-depth qualitative comparison of three role initiatives in general practices in one area of Greater Manchester, England; that is, advanced practitioner and physician associate training schemes, and a locally commissioned practice pharmacist service. METHOD: Semi-structured interviews and focus groups with a purposive sample of stakeholders involved in the implementation of each role initiative were conducted. Template analysis enabled the production of pre-determined and researcher-generated codes, categories, and themes. RESULTS: The final sample contained 38 stakeholders comprising training/service leads, role holders, and host practice staff. Three key themes captured participants’ perspectives: purpose and place of new roles in general practice, involving unclear role definition and tension at professional boundaries; transition of new roles into general practice, involving risk management, closing training–practice gaps and managing expectations; and future of new roles in general practice, involving demonstrating impact and questions about sustainability. CONCLUSION: This in-depth, in-context comparative study highlights that introducing new roles to general practice is not a simple process. Recognition of factors affecting the assimilation of roles may help to better align them with the goals of general practice and harness the commitment of individual practices to enable role sustainability. Royal College of General Practitioners 2019-07 2019-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6592332/ /pubmed/31160367 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgp19X704117 Text en © British Journal of General Practice 2019 This article is Open Access: CC BY-NC 4.0 licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Research Nelson, Pauline A Bradley, Fay Martindale, Anne-Marie McBride, Anne Hodgson, Damian Skill-mix change in general practice: a qualitative comparison of three ‘new’ non-medical roles in English primary care |
title | Skill-mix change in general practice: a qualitative comparison of three ‘new’ non-medical roles in English primary care |
title_full | Skill-mix change in general practice: a qualitative comparison of three ‘new’ non-medical roles in English primary care |
title_fullStr | Skill-mix change in general practice: a qualitative comparison of three ‘new’ non-medical roles in English primary care |
title_full_unstemmed | Skill-mix change in general practice: a qualitative comparison of three ‘new’ non-medical roles in English primary care |
title_short | Skill-mix change in general practice: a qualitative comparison of three ‘new’ non-medical roles in English primary care |
title_sort | skill-mix change in general practice: a qualitative comparison of three ‘new’ non-medical roles in english primary care |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6592332/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31160367 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgp19X704117 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nelsonpaulinea skillmixchangeingeneralpracticeaqualitativecomparisonofthreenewnonmedicalrolesinenglishprimarycare AT bradleyfay skillmixchangeingeneralpracticeaqualitativecomparisonofthreenewnonmedicalrolesinenglishprimarycare AT martindaleannemarie skillmixchangeingeneralpracticeaqualitativecomparisonofthreenewnonmedicalrolesinenglishprimarycare AT mcbrideanne skillmixchangeingeneralpracticeaqualitativecomparisonofthreenewnonmedicalrolesinenglishprimarycare AT hodgsondamian skillmixchangeingeneralpracticeaqualitativecomparisonofthreenewnonmedicalrolesinenglishprimarycare |