Cargando…

Estimating Maximal Oxygen Uptake From Daily Activity Data Measured by a Watch-Type Fitness Tracker: Cross-Sectional Study

BACKGROUND: Cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF), an important index of physical fitness, is the ability to inhale and provide oxygen to the exercising muscle. However, despite its importance, the current gold standard for measuring CRF is impractical, requiring maximal exercise from the participants. OB...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kwon, Soon Bin, Ahn, Joong Woo, Lee, Seung Min, Lee, Joonnyong, Lee, Dongheon, Hong, Jeeyoung, Kim, Hee Chan, Yoon, Hyung-Jin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6592480/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31199336
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/13327
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF), an important index of physical fitness, is the ability to inhale and provide oxygen to the exercising muscle. However, despite its importance, the current gold standard for measuring CRF is impractical, requiring maximal exercise from the participants. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop a convenient and practical estimation model for CRF using data collected from daily life with a wristwatch-type device. METHODS: A total of 191 subjects, aged 20 to 65 years, participated in this study. Maximal oxygen uptake (VO(2) max), a standard measure of CRF, was measured with a maximal exercise test. Heart rate (HR) and physical activity data were collected using a commercial wristwatch-type fitness tracker (Fitbit; Fitbit Charge; Fitbit) for 3 consecutive days. Maximal activity energy expenditure (aEEmax) and slope between HR and physical activity were calculated using a linear regression. A VO(2) max estimation model was built using multiple linear regression with data on age, sex, height, percent body fat, aEEmax, and the slope. The result was validated with 2 different cross-validation methods. RESULTS: aEEmax showed a moderate correlation with VO(2) max (r=0.50). The correlation coefficient for the multiple linear regression model was 0.81, and the SE of estimate (SEE) was 3.518 mL/kg/min. The regression model was cross-validated through the predicted residual error sum of square (PRESS). The PRESS correlation coefficient was 0.79, and the PRESS SEE was 3.667 mL/kg/min. The model was further validated by dividing it into different subgroups and calculating the constant error (CE) where a low CE showed that the model does not significantly overestimate or underestimate VO(2) max. CONCLUSIONS: This study proposes a CRF estimation method using data collected by a wristwatch-type fitness tracker without any specific protocol for a wide range of the population.