Cargando…

Thermal constraints on in vivo optogenetic manipulations

A key assumption of optogenetics is that light only affects opsin-expressing neurons. However, illumination invariably heats tissue, and many physiological processes are temperature-sensitive. Commonly-used illumination protocols increased temperature by 0.2–2°C and suppressed spiking in multiple br...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Owen, Scott F., Liu, Max H., Kreitzer, Anatol C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6592769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31209378
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41593-019-0422-3
_version_ 1783429929422028800
author Owen, Scott F.
Liu, Max H.
Kreitzer, Anatol C.
author_facet Owen, Scott F.
Liu, Max H.
Kreitzer, Anatol C.
author_sort Owen, Scott F.
collection PubMed
description A key assumption of optogenetics is that light only affects opsin-expressing neurons. However, illumination invariably heats tissue, and many physiological processes are temperature-sensitive. Commonly-used illumination protocols increased temperature by 0.2–2°C and suppressed spiking in multiple brain regions. In striatum, light delivery activated an inwardly-rectifying potassium conductance and biased rotational behavior. Thus, careful consideration of light delivery parameters is required, as even modest intracranial heating can confound interpretation of optogenetic experiments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6592769
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65927692019-12-17 Thermal constraints on in vivo optogenetic manipulations Owen, Scott F. Liu, Max H. Kreitzer, Anatol C. Nat Neurosci Article A key assumption of optogenetics is that light only affects opsin-expressing neurons. However, illumination invariably heats tissue, and many physiological processes are temperature-sensitive. Commonly-used illumination protocols increased temperature by 0.2–2°C and suppressed spiking in multiple brain regions. In striatum, light delivery activated an inwardly-rectifying potassium conductance and biased rotational behavior. Thus, careful consideration of light delivery parameters is required, as even modest intracranial heating can confound interpretation of optogenetic experiments. 2019-06-17 2019-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6592769/ /pubmed/31209378 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41593-019-0422-3 Text en Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use:http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms
spellingShingle Article
Owen, Scott F.
Liu, Max H.
Kreitzer, Anatol C.
Thermal constraints on in vivo optogenetic manipulations
title Thermal constraints on in vivo optogenetic manipulations
title_full Thermal constraints on in vivo optogenetic manipulations
title_fullStr Thermal constraints on in vivo optogenetic manipulations
title_full_unstemmed Thermal constraints on in vivo optogenetic manipulations
title_short Thermal constraints on in vivo optogenetic manipulations
title_sort thermal constraints on in vivo optogenetic manipulations
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6592769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31209378
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41593-019-0422-3
work_keys_str_mv AT owenscottf thermalconstraintsoninvivooptogeneticmanipulations
AT liumaxh thermalconstraintsoninvivooptogeneticmanipulations
AT kreitzeranatolc thermalconstraintsoninvivooptogeneticmanipulations