Cargando…

Effect of locomotor demands on cognitive processing

Understanding how brain dynamics change with dual cognitive and motor tasks can improve our knowledge of human neurophysiology. The primary goals of this study were to: (1) assess the feasibility of extracting electrocortical signals from scalp EEG while performing sustained, physically demanding du...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cortney Bradford, J., Lukos, Jamie R., Passaro, Antony, Ries, Anthony, Ferris, Daniel P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6592922/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31239461
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-45396-5
_version_ 1783429945785057280
author Cortney Bradford, J.
Lukos, Jamie R.
Passaro, Antony
Ries, Anthony
Ferris, Daniel P.
author_facet Cortney Bradford, J.
Lukos, Jamie R.
Passaro, Antony
Ries, Anthony
Ferris, Daniel P.
author_sort Cortney Bradford, J.
collection PubMed
description Understanding how brain dynamics change with dual cognitive and motor tasks can improve our knowledge of human neurophysiology. The primary goals of this study were to: (1) assess the feasibility of extracting electrocortical signals from scalp EEG while performing sustained, physically demanding dual-task walking and (2) test hypotheses about how the P300 event-related potential is affected by walking physical exertion. Participants walked on a treadmill for an hour either carrying an empty rucksack or one filled with 40% of their body weight. During the walking conditions and during a seated control condition, subjects periodically performed a visual oddball task. We recorded scalp EEG and examined electrocortical dynamics time-locked to the target stimulus. Channel-level event-related potential analysis demonstrated that it is feasible to extract reliable signals during long duration loaded walking. P300 amplitude was reduced during loaded walking versus seated, but there was no effect of time on task. Source level activity and frequency analysis revealed that sensorimotor, parietal, and cingulate brain areas all contributed to the reduced P300 amplitude during dual-task walking. We interpret the results as supporting a prioritization of cortical resources for walking, leading to fewer resources being directed toward the oddball task during dual-task locomotion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6592922
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65929222019-07-03 Effect of locomotor demands on cognitive processing Cortney Bradford, J. Lukos, Jamie R. Passaro, Antony Ries, Anthony Ferris, Daniel P. Sci Rep Article Understanding how brain dynamics change with dual cognitive and motor tasks can improve our knowledge of human neurophysiology. The primary goals of this study were to: (1) assess the feasibility of extracting electrocortical signals from scalp EEG while performing sustained, physically demanding dual-task walking and (2) test hypotheses about how the P300 event-related potential is affected by walking physical exertion. Participants walked on a treadmill for an hour either carrying an empty rucksack or one filled with 40% of their body weight. During the walking conditions and during a seated control condition, subjects periodically performed a visual oddball task. We recorded scalp EEG and examined electrocortical dynamics time-locked to the target stimulus. Channel-level event-related potential analysis demonstrated that it is feasible to extract reliable signals during long duration loaded walking. P300 amplitude was reduced during loaded walking versus seated, but there was no effect of time on task. Source level activity and frequency analysis revealed that sensorimotor, parietal, and cingulate brain areas all contributed to the reduced P300 amplitude during dual-task walking. We interpret the results as supporting a prioritization of cortical resources for walking, leading to fewer resources being directed toward the oddball task during dual-task locomotion. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6592922/ /pubmed/31239461 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-45396-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Cortney Bradford, J.
Lukos, Jamie R.
Passaro, Antony
Ries, Anthony
Ferris, Daniel P.
Effect of locomotor demands on cognitive processing
title Effect of locomotor demands on cognitive processing
title_full Effect of locomotor demands on cognitive processing
title_fullStr Effect of locomotor demands on cognitive processing
title_full_unstemmed Effect of locomotor demands on cognitive processing
title_short Effect of locomotor demands on cognitive processing
title_sort effect of locomotor demands on cognitive processing
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6592922/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31239461
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-45396-5
work_keys_str_mv AT cortneybradfordj effectoflocomotordemandsoncognitiveprocessing
AT lukosjamier effectoflocomotordemandsoncognitiveprocessing
AT passaroantony effectoflocomotordemandsoncognitiveprocessing
AT riesanthony effectoflocomotordemandsoncognitiveprocessing
AT ferrisdanielp effectoflocomotordemandsoncognitiveprocessing