Cargando…
Correction: Clinical and cost-effectiveness of the Ross procedure versus conventional aortic valve replacement in young adults
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
---|---|
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6593192/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31297230 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2019-001047corr1 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Clinical and cost-effectiveness of the Ross procedure versus conventional aortic valve replacement in young adults
por: Thom, Howard, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Secondary Ross procedure after failed transcatheter aortic valve replacement
por: Fukuhara, Shinichi
Publicado: (2022) -
Ross Procedure Versus Mechanical Versus Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement: A Network Meta‐Analysis
por: Yokoyama, Yujiro, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
The Ross procedure versus repair for treatment of a unicuspid aortic valve in adults
por: Abeln, Karen B, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Ross procedure in bicuspid aortic valve pathologies
por: Misfeld, Martin, et al.
Publicado: (2022)