Cargando…

Cytokine Adsorption in Critically Ill Patients Requiring ECMO Support

Systemic inflammation is a key characteristic of sepsis but also also in non-infectious conditions such as post-cardiac arrest syndrome. Cytokine adsorption and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation are emerging therapies applied in these critically ill patients, but the experience with their concurre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lother, Achim, Benk, Christoph, Staudacher, Dawid L., Supady, Alexander, Bode, Christoph, Wengenmayer, Tobias, Duerschmied, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6593298/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31275944
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2019.00071
_version_ 1783430014543331328
author Lother, Achim
Benk, Christoph
Staudacher, Dawid L.
Supady, Alexander
Bode, Christoph
Wengenmayer, Tobias
Duerschmied, Daniel
author_facet Lother, Achim
Benk, Christoph
Staudacher, Dawid L.
Supady, Alexander
Bode, Christoph
Wengenmayer, Tobias
Duerschmied, Daniel
author_sort Lother, Achim
collection PubMed
description Systemic inflammation is a key characteristic of sepsis but also also in non-infectious conditions such as post-cardiac arrest syndrome. Cytokine adsorption and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation are emerging therapies applied in these critically ill patients, but the experience with their concurrent use is limited. We evaluated cytokine adsorption in critically ill patients requiring support with either veno-venous (vv) or veno-arterial (va) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support and hypothesized that adsorber incorporation into the ECMO circuit was technically feasible and not associated with imminent risk. We analyzed data from the first six cases of a prospective single-center registry of patients undergoing veno-venous (vv) or veno-arterial (va) ECMO therapy. While in most published cases cytokine adsorbers were inserted into a hemofiltration circuit, we directly incorporated the adsorber into the ECMO circuit without interruption of continuous ECMO support. We observed no relevant side effects attributable to cytokine adsorption. Thirty-day mortality was 83% (predicted mortality 87%), indicating that the decision for adding cytokine adsorption may have been considered as an ultima ratio decision in severe cases with poor prognosis. Vasopressor or inotrope use, lactate level, and fluid balance did not change significantly when comparing pre- vs. post-cytokine adsorption values. Interestingly, the real-time course of the mentioned three surrogate parameters remained unaltered in all but two cases, regardless of cytokine removal. Beneficial effects of cytokine adsorption are plausible in two va-ECMO-treated patient, where increasing lactate began to drop after initiation of cytokine adsorption. Taken together, these data suggest that incorporation of cytokine adsorption into the management of critically ill patients requiring continued ECMO support is feasible and easy to handle. Whether cytokine removal improves clinical outcome in ECMO-treated patients should now be investigated in randomized controlled trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6593298
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65932982019-07-03 Cytokine Adsorption in Critically Ill Patients Requiring ECMO Support Lother, Achim Benk, Christoph Staudacher, Dawid L. Supady, Alexander Bode, Christoph Wengenmayer, Tobias Duerschmied, Daniel Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine Systemic inflammation is a key characteristic of sepsis but also also in non-infectious conditions such as post-cardiac arrest syndrome. Cytokine adsorption and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation are emerging therapies applied in these critically ill patients, but the experience with their concurrent use is limited. We evaluated cytokine adsorption in critically ill patients requiring support with either veno-venous (vv) or veno-arterial (va) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support and hypothesized that adsorber incorporation into the ECMO circuit was technically feasible and not associated with imminent risk. We analyzed data from the first six cases of a prospective single-center registry of patients undergoing veno-venous (vv) or veno-arterial (va) ECMO therapy. While in most published cases cytokine adsorbers were inserted into a hemofiltration circuit, we directly incorporated the adsorber into the ECMO circuit without interruption of continuous ECMO support. We observed no relevant side effects attributable to cytokine adsorption. Thirty-day mortality was 83% (predicted mortality 87%), indicating that the decision for adding cytokine adsorption may have been considered as an ultima ratio decision in severe cases with poor prognosis. Vasopressor or inotrope use, lactate level, and fluid balance did not change significantly when comparing pre- vs. post-cytokine adsorption values. Interestingly, the real-time course of the mentioned three surrogate parameters remained unaltered in all but two cases, regardless of cytokine removal. Beneficial effects of cytokine adsorption are plausible in two va-ECMO-treated patient, where increasing lactate began to drop after initiation of cytokine adsorption. Taken together, these data suggest that incorporation of cytokine adsorption into the management of critically ill patients requiring continued ECMO support is feasible and easy to handle. Whether cytokine removal improves clinical outcome in ECMO-treated patients should now be investigated in randomized controlled trials. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6593298/ /pubmed/31275944 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2019.00071 Text en Copyright © 2019 Lother, Benk, Staudacher, Supady, Bode, Wengenmayer and Duerschmied. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Lother, Achim
Benk, Christoph
Staudacher, Dawid L.
Supady, Alexander
Bode, Christoph
Wengenmayer, Tobias
Duerschmied, Daniel
Cytokine Adsorption in Critically Ill Patients Requiring ECMO Support
title Cytokine Adsorption in Critically Ill Patients Requiring ECMO Support
title_full Cytokine Adsorption in Critically Ill Patients Requiring ECMO Support
title_fullStr Cytokine Adsorption in Critically Ill Patients Requiring ECMO Support
title_full_unstemmed Cytokine Adsorption in Critically Ill Patients Requiring ECMO Support
title_short Cytokine Adsorption in Critically Ill Patients Requiring ECMO Support
title_sort cytokine adsorption in critically ill patients requiring ecmo support
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6593298/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31275944
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2019.00071
work_keys_str_mv AT lotherachim cytokineadsorptionincriticallyillpatientsrequiringecmosupport
AT benkchristoph cytokineadsorptionincriticallyillpatientsrequiringecmosupport
AT staudacherdawidl cytokineadsorptionincriticallyillpatientsrequiringecmosupport
AT supadyalexander cytokineadsorptionincriticallyillpatientsrequiringecmosupport
AT bodechristoph cytokineadsorptionincriticallyillpatientsrequiringecmosupport
AT wengenmayertobias cytokineadsorptionincriticallyillpatientsrequiringecmosupport
AT duerschmieddaniel cytokineadsorptionincriticallyillpatientsrequiringecmosupport