Cargando…

Immediate versus delayed removal of urinary catheter after laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if immediate catheter removal (ICR) after laparoscopic hysterectomy is associated with similar retention outcomes compared with delayed removal (DCR). STUDY DESIGN: Non‐inferiority randomised controlled trial. POPULATION: Women undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy in six hospi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sandberg, EM, Twijnstra, ARH, van Meir, CA, Kok, HS, van Geloven, N, Gludovacz, K, Kolkman, W, Nagel, HTC, Haans, LCF, Kapiteijn, K, Jansen, FW
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6593458/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30548529
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15580
_version_ 1783430050469642240
author Sandberg, EM
Twijnstra, ARH
van Meir, CA
Kok, HS
van Geloven, N
Gludovacz, K
Kolkman, W
Nagel, HTC
Haans, LCF
Kapiteijn, K
Jansen, FW
author_facet Sandberg, EM
Twijnstra, ARH
van Meir, CA
Kok, HS
van Geloven, N
Gludovacz, K
Kolkman, W
Nagel, HTC
Haans, LCF
Kapiteijn, K
Jansen, FW
author_sort Sandberg, EM
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if immediate catheter removal (ICR) after laparoscopic hysterectomy is associated with similar retention outcomes compared with delayed removal (DCR). STUDY DESIGN: Non‐inferiority randomised controlled trial. POPULATION: Women undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy in six hospitals in the Netherlands. METHODS: Women were randomised to ICR or DCR (between 18 and 24 hours after surgery). PRIMARY OUTCOME: The inability to void within 6 hours after catheter removal. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty‐five women were randomised to ICR (n = 74) and DCR (n = 81). The intention‐to‐treat and per‐protocol analysis could not demonstrate the non‐inferiority of ICR: ten women with ICR could not urinate spontaneously within 6 hours compared with none in the delayed group (risk difference 13.5%, 5.6–24.8, P = 0.88). However, seven of these women could void spontaneously within 9 hours without additional intervention. Regarding the secondary outcomes, eight women from the delayed group requested earlier catheter removal because of complaints (9.9%). Three women with ICR (4.1%) had a urinary tract infection postoperatively versus eight with DCR (9.9%, risk difference −5.8%, −15.1 to 3.5, P = 0.215). Women with ICR mobilised significantly earlier (5.7 hours, 0.8–23.3 versus 21.0 hours, 1.4–29.9; P ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSION: The non‐inferiority of ICR could not be demonstrated in terms of urinary retention 6 hours after procedure. However, 70% of the women with voiding difficulties could void spontaneously within 9 hours after laparoscopic hysterectomy. It is therefore questionable if all observed urinary retention cases were clinically relevant. As a result, the clinical advantages of ICR may still outweigh the risk of bladder retention and it should therefore be considered after uncomplicated laparoscopic hysterectomy. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: The advantages of immediate catheter removal after laparoscopic hysterectomy seem to outweigh the risk of bladder retention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6593458
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65934582019-07-10 Immediate versus delayed removal of urinary catheter after laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomised controlled trial Sandberg, EM Twijnstra, ARH van Meir, CA Kok, HS van Geloven, N Gludovacz, K Kolkman, W Nagel, HTC Haans, LCF Kapiteijn, K Jansen, FW BJOG Gynaecological Surgery OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if immediate catheter removal (ICR) after laparoscopic hysterectomy is associated with similar retention outcomes compared with delayed removal (DCR). STUDY DESIGN: Non‐inferiority randomised controlled trial. POPULATION: Women undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy in six hospitals in the Netherlands. METHODS: Women were randomised to ICR or DCR (between 18 and 24 hours after surgery). PRIMARY OUTCOME: The inability to void within 6 hours after catheter removal. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty‐five women were randomised to ICR (n = 74) and DCR (n = 81). The intention‐to‐treat and per‐protocol analysis could not demonstrate the non‐inferiority of ICR: ten women with ICR could not urinate spontaneously within 6 hours compared with none in the delayed group (risk difference 13.5%, 5.6–24.8, P = 0.88). However, seven of these women could void spontaneously within 9 hours without additional intervention. Regarding the secondary outcomes, eight women from the delayed group requested earlier catheter removal because of complaints (9.9%). Three women with ICR (4.1%) had a urinary tract infection postoperatively versus eight with DCR (9.9%, risk difference −5.8%, −15.1 to 3.5, P = 0.215). Women with ICR mobilised significantly earlier (5.7 hours, 0.8–23.3 versus 21.0 hours, 1.4–29.9; P ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSION: The non‐inferiority of ICR could not be demonstrated in terms of urinary retention 6 hours after procedure. However, 70% of the women with voiding difficulties could void spontaneously within 9 hours after laparoscopic hysterectomy. It is therefore questionable if all observed urinary retention cases were clinically relevant. As a result, the clinical advantages of ICR may still outweigh the risk of bladder retention and it should therefore be considered after uncomplicated laparoscopic hysterectomy. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: The advantages of immediate catheter removal after laparoscopic hysterectomy seem to outweigh the risk of bladder retention. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-03-01 2019-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6593458/ /pubmed/30548529 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15580 Text en © 2018 The Authors BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Gynaecological Surgery
Sandberg, EM
Twijnstra, ARH
van Meir, CA
Kok, HS
van Geloven, N
Gludovacz, K
Kolkman, W
Nagel, HTC
Haans, LCF
Kapiteijn, K
Jansen, FW
Immediate versus delayed removal of urinary catheter after laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomised controlled trial
title Immediate versus delayed removal of urinary catheter after laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomised controlled trial
title_full Immediate versus delayed removal of urinary catheter after laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Immediate versus delayed removal of urinary catheter after laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Immediate versus delayed removal of urinary catheter after laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomised controlled trial
title_short Immediate versus delayed removal of urinary catheter after laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomised controlled trial
title_sort immediate versus delayed removal of urinary catheter after laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomised controlled trial
topic Gynaecological Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6593458/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30548529
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15580
work_keys_str_mv AT sandbergem immediateversusdelayedremovalofurinarycatheterafterlaparoscopichysterectomyarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT twijnstraarh immediateversusdelayedremovalofurinarycatheterafterlaparoscopichysterectomyarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT vanmeirca immediateversusdelayedremovalofurinarycatheterafterlaparoscopichysterectomyarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT kokhs immediateversusdelayedremovalofurinarycatheterafterlaparoscopichysterectomyarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT vangelovenn immediateversusdelayedremovalofurinarycatheterafterlaparoscopichysterectomyarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT gludovaczk immediateversusdelayedremovalofurinarycatheterafterlaparoscopichysterectomyarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT kolkmanw immediateversusdelayedremovalofurinarycatheterafterlaparoscopichysterectomyarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT nagelhtc immediateversusdelayedremovalofurinarycatheterafterlaparoscopichysterectomyarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT haanslcf immediateversusdelayedremovalofurinarycatheterafterlaparoscopichysterectomyarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT kapiteijnk immediateversusdelayedremovalofurinarycatheterafterlaparoscopichysterectomyarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT jansenfw immediateversusdelayedremovalofurinarycatheterafterlaparoscopichysterectomyarandomisedcontrolledtrial