Cargando…
Immediate versus delayed removal of urinary catheter after laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomised controlled trial
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if immediate catheter removal (ICR) after laparoscopic hysterectomy is associated with similar retention outcomes compared with delayed removal (DCR). STUDY DESIGN: Non‐inferiority randomised controlled trial. POPULATION: Women undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy in six hospi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6593458/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30548529 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15580 |
_version_ | 1783430050469642240 |
---|---|
author | Sandberg, EM Twijnstra, ARH van Meir, CA Kok, HS van Geloven, N Gludovacz, K Kolkman, W Nagel, HTC Haans, LCF Kapiteijn, K Jansen, FW |
author_facet | Sandberg, EM Twijnstra, ARH van Meir, CA Kok, HS van Geloven, N Gludovacz, K Kolkman, W Nagel, HTC Haans, LCF Kapiteijn, K Jansen, FW |
author_sort | Sandberg, EM |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if immediate catheter removal (ICR) after laparoscopic hysterectomy is associated with similar retention outcomes compared with delayed removal (DCR). STUDY DESIGN: Non‐inferiority randomised controlled trial. POPULATION: Women undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy in six hospitals in the Netherlands. METHODS: Women were randomised to ICR or DCR (between 18 and 24 hours after surgery). PRIMARY OUTCOME: The inability to void within 6 hours after catheter removal. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty‐five women were randomised to ICR (n = 74) and DCR (n = 81). The intention‐to‐treat and per‐protocol analysis could not demonstrate the non‐inferiority of ICR: ten women with ICR could not urinate spontaneously within 6 hours compared with none in the delayed group (risk difference 13.5%, 5.6–24.8, P = 0.88). However, seven of these women could void spontaneously within 9 hours without additional intervention. Regarding the secondary outcomes, eight women from the delayed group requested earlier catheter removal because of complaints (9.9%). Three women with ICR (4.1%) had a urinary tract infection postoperatively versus eight with DCR (9.9%, risk difference −5.8%, −15.1 to 3.5, P = 0.215). Women with ICR mobilised significantly earlier (5.7 hours, 0.8–23.3 versus 21.0 hours, 1.4–29.9; P ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSION: The non‐inferiority of ICR could not be demonstrated in terms of urinary retention 6 hours after procedure. However, 70% of the women with voiding difficulties could void spontaneously within 9 hours after laparoscopic hysterectomy. It is therefore questionable if all observed urinary retention cases were clinically relevant. As a result, the clinical advantages of ICR may still outweigh the risk of bladder retention and it should therefore be considered after uncomplicated laparoscopic hysterectomy. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: The advantages of immediate catheter removal after laparoscopic hysterectomy seem to outweigh the risk of bladder retention. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6593458 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65934582019-07-10 Immediate versus delayed removal of urinary catheter after laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomised controlled trial Sandberg, EM Twijnstra, ARH van Meir, CA Kok, HS van Geloven, N Gludovacz, K Kolkman, W Nagel, HTC Haans, LCF Kapiteijn, K Jansen, FW BJOG Gynaecological Surgery OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if immediate catheter removal (ICR) after laparoscopic hysterectomy is associated with similar retention outcomes compared with delayed removal (DCR). STUDY DESIGN: Non‐inferiority randomised controlled trial. POPULATION: Women undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy in six hospitals in the Netherlands. METHODS: Women were randomised to ICR or DCR (between 18 and 24 hours after surgery). PRIMARY OUTCOME: The inability to void within 6 hours after catheter removal. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty‐five women were randomised to ICR (n = 74) and DCR (n = 81). The intention‐to‐treat and per‐protocol analysis could not demonstrate the non‐inferiority of ICR: ten women with ICR could not urinate spontaneously within 6 hours compared with none in the delayed group (risk difference 13.5%, 5.6–24.8, P = 0.88). However, seven of these women could void spontaneously within 9 hours without additional intervention. Regarding the secondary outcomes, eight women from the delayed group requested earlier catheter removal because of complaints (9.9%). Three women with ICR (4.1%) had a urinary tract infection postoperatively versus eight with DCR (9.9%, risk difference −5.8%, −15.1 to 3.5, P = 0.215). Women with ICR mobilised significantly earlier (5.7 hours, 0.8–23.3 versus 21.0 hours, 1.4–29.9; P ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSION: The non‐inferiority of ICR could not be demonstrated in terms of urinary retention 6 hours after procedure. However, 70% of the women with voiding difficulties could void spontaneously within 9 hours after laparoscopic hysterectomy. It is therefore questionable if all observed urinary retention cases were clinically relevant. As a result, the clinical advantages of ICR may still outweigh the risk of bladder retention and it should therefore be considered after uncomplicated laparoscopic hysterectomy. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: The advantages of immediate catheter removal after laparoscopic hysterectomy seem to outweigh the risk of bladder retention. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-03-01 2019-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6593458/ /pubmed/30548529 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15580 Text en © 2018 The Authors BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Gynaecological Surgery Sandberg, EM Twijnstra, ARH van Meir, CA Kok, HS van Geloven, N Gludovacz, K Kolkman, W Nagel, HTC Haans, LCF Kapiteijn, K Jansen, FW Immediate versus delayed removal of urinary catheter after laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomised controlled trial |
title | Immediate versus delayed removal of urinary catheter after laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Immediate versus delayed removal of urinary catheter after laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Immediate versus delayed removal of urinary catheter after laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Immediate versus delayed removal of urinary catheter after laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Immediate versus delayed removal of urinary catheter after laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | immediate versus delayed removal of urinary catheter after laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomised controlled trial |
topic | Gynaecological Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6593458/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30548529 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15580 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sandbergem immediateversusdelayedremovalofurinarycatheterafterlaparoscopichysterectomyarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT twijnstraarh immediateversusdelayedremovalofurinarycatheterafterlaparoscopichysterectomyarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT vanmeirca immediateversusdelayedremovalofurinarycatheterafterlaparoscopichysterectomyarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT kokhs immediateversusdelayedremovalofurinarycatheterafterlaparoscopichysterectomyarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT vangelovenn immediateversusdelayedremovalofurinarycatheterafterlaparoscopichysterectomyarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT gludovaczk immediateversusdelayedremovalofurinarycatheterafterlaparoscopichysterectomyarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT kolkmanw immediateversusdelayedremovalofurinarycatheterafterlaparoscopichysterectomyarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT nagelhtc immediateversusdelayedremovalofurinarycatheterafterlaparoscopichysterectomyarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT haanslcf immediateversusdelayedremovalofurinarycatheterafterlaparoscopichysterectomyarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT kapiteijnk immediateversusdelayedremovalofurinarycatheterafterlaparoscopichysterectomyarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT jansenfw immediateversusdelayedremovalofurinarycatheterafterlaparoscopichysterectomyarandomisedcontrolledtrial |