Cargando…

End-of-life care in rural general practice: how best to support commitment and meet challenges?

BACKGROUND: Few studies have specifically assessed the scope, nature and challenges of palliative and end-of-life care in rural general practice. These knowledge gaps limit the development of evidence-based policies and services for patients in the last months of life. This study aimed to explore th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ding, Jinfeng, Saunders, Christobel, Cook, Angus, Johnson, Claire E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6593492/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31238934
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-019-0435-4
_version_ 1783430058508025856
author Ding, Jinfeng
Saunders, Christobel
Cook, Angus
Johnson, Claire E.
author_facet Ding, Jinfeng
Saunders, Christobel
Cook, Angus
Johnson, Claire E.
author_sort Ding, Jinfeng
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Few studies have specifically assessed the scope, nature and challenges of palliative and end-of-life care in rural general practice. These knowledge gaps limit the development of evidence-based policies and services for patients in the last months of life. This study aimed to explore the perspectives of general practitioners (GPs) and other stakeholders on rural GPs’ involvement and challenges in providing palliative and end-of-life care in regional Australia. METHODS: A qualitative study involving five focus groups with 26 GPs based in rural/regional Western Australia together with 15 individual telephone interviews with four GPs and 11 other stakeholders involved in end-of-life care across Australia. RESULTS: The rural GPs’ central role in end-of-life care was recognized by the majority of participants but multiple challenges were also identified. Some challenges were comparable to those found in urban settings but others were more pronounced, including resource limitations and lack of training. Inappropriate payment models discouraged GPs’ involvement in some aspects of end-of-life care, such as case conferences and home visits. Compared to GPs in urban settings, those in rural/regional communities often reported closer doctor-patient relationships and better care integration and collaboration. These positive aspects of care could be further developed to enhance service provision. Our study highlighted the importance of regular interactions with other professionals and patients in providing end-of-life care, but many GPs and other stakeholders found such interactions more challenging than the more “technical” aspects of care. CONCLUSIONS: Rural/regional GPs appear to be disproportionately affected by inappropriate payment models and limited resources, but may benefit from closer doctor-patient relationships and better care integration and collaboration relative to urban GPs. Systematic collection of empirical data on GP management at end-of-life is required to build on these strengths and address the challenges. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12904-019-0435-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6593492
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65934922019-07-09 End-of-life care in rural general practice: how best to support commitment and meet challenges? Ding, Jinfeng Saunders, Christobel Cook, Angus Johnson, Claire E. BMC Palliat Care Research Article BACKGROUND: Few studies have specifically assessed the scope, nature and challenges of palliative and end-of-life care in rural general practice. These knowledge gaps limit the development of evidence-based policies and services for patients in the last months of life. This study aimed to explore the perspectives of general practitioners (GPs) and other stakeholders on rural GPs’ involvement and challenges in providing palliative and end-of-life care in regional Australia. METHODS: A qualitative study involving five focus groups with 26 GPs based in rural/regional Western Australia together with 15 individual telephone interviews with four GPs and 11 other stakeholders involved in end-of-life care across Australia. RESULTS: The rural GPs’ central role in end-of-life care was recognized by the majority of participants but multiple challenges were also identified. Some challenges were comparable to those found in urban settings but others were more pronounced, including resource limitations and lack of training. Inappropriate payment models discouraged GPs’ involvement in some aspects of end-of-life care, such as case conferences and home visits. Compared to GPs in urban settings, those in rural/regional communities often reported closer doctor-patient relationships and better care integration and collaboration. These positive aspects of care could be further developed to enhance service provision. Our study highlighted the importance of regular interactions with other professionals and patients in providing end-of-life care, but many GPs and other stakeholders found such interactions more challenging than the more “technical” aspects of care. CONCLUSIONS: Rural/regional GPs appear to be disproportionately affected by inappropriate payment models and limited resources, but may benefit from closer doctor-patient relationships and better care integration and collaboration relative to urban GPs. Systematic collection of empirical data on GP management at end-of-life is required to build on these strengths and address the challenges. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12904-019-0435-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6593492/ /pubmed/31238934 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-019-0435-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ding, Jinfeng
Saunders, Christobel
Cook, Angus
Johnson, Claire E.
End-of-life care in rural general practice: how best to support commitment and meet challenges?
title End-of-life care in rural general practice: how best to support commitment and meet challenges?
title_full End-of-life care in rural general practice: how best to support commitment and meet challenges?
title_fullStr End-of-life care in rural general practice: how best to support commitment and meet challenges?
title_full_unstemmed End-of-life care in rural general practice: how best to support commitment and meet challenges?
title_short End-of-life care in rural general practice: how best to support commitment and meet challenges?
title_sort end-of-life care in rural general practice: how best to support commitment and meet challenges?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6593492/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31238934
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-019-0435-4
work_keys_str_mv AT dingjinfeng endoflifecareinruralgeneralpracticehowbesttosupportcommitmentandmeetchallenges
AT saunderschristobel endoflifecareinruralgeneralpracticehowbesttosupportcommitmentandmeetchallenges
AT cookangus endoflifecareinruralgeneralpracticehowbesttosupportcommitmentandmeetchallenges
AT johnsonclairee endoflifecareinruralgeneralpracticehowbesttosupportcommitmentandmeetchallenges