Cargando…

Cooled radiofrequency ablation of the genicular nerves for chronic pain due to osteoarthritis of the knee: a cost-effectiveness analysis based on trial data

BACKGROUND: For patients with painful knee osteoarthritis, long-term symptomatic relief may improve quality of life. Cooled radiofrequency ablation (CRFA) has demonstrated significant improvements in pain, physical function and health-related quality of life compared with conservative therapy with i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Desai, Mehul, Bentley, Anthony, Keck, William A., Haag, Thomas, Taylor, Rod S., Dakin, Helen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6593544/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31238925
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2681-2
_version_ 1783430070748053504
author Desai, Mehul
Bentley, Anthony
Keck, William A.
Haag, Thomas
Taylor, Rod S.
Dakin, Helen
author_facet Desai, Mehul
Bentley, Anthony
Keck, William A.
Haag, Thomas
Taylor, Rod S.
Dakin, Helen
author_sort Desai, Mehul
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: For patients with painful knee osteoarthritis, long-term symptomatic relief may improve quality of life. Cooled radiofrequency ablation (CRFA) has demonstrated significant improvements in pain, physical function and health-related quality of life compared with conservative therapy with intra-articular steroid (IAS) injections. This study aimed to establish the cost-effectiveness of CRFA compared with IAS for managing moderate to severe osteoarthritis-related knee pain, from the US Medicare system perspective. METHODS: We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis utilizing efficacy data (Oxford Knee Scores) from a randomized, crossover trial on CRFA (NCT02343003), which compared CRFA with IAS out to 6 and 12 months, and with IAS patients who subsequently crossed over to receive CRFA after 6 months. Outcomes included health benefits (quality-adjusted life-years [QALYs]), costs and cost-effectiveness (expressed as cost per QALY gained). QALYs were estimated by mapping Oxford Knee Scores to the EQ-5D generic utility measure using a validated algorithm. Secondary analyses explored differences in the settings of care and procedures used in-trial versus real-world clinical practice. RESULTS: CRFA resulted in an incremental QALY gain of 0.091 at an incremental cost of $1711, equating to a cost of US$18,773 per QALY gained over a 6-month time horizon versus IAS. Over a 12-month time horizon, the incremental QALY gain was 0.229 at the same incremental cost, equating to a cost of US$7462 per QALY gained versus IAS. Real-world cost assumptions resulted in modest increases in the cost per QALY gained to a maximum of US$21,166 and US$8296 at 6 and 12 months, respectively. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated that findings were robust to variations in efficacy and cost parameters. CONCLUSIONS: CRFA is a highly cost-effective treatment option for patients with osteoarthritis-related knee pain, compared with the US$100,000/QALY threshold typically used in the US. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12891-019-2681-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6593544
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65935442019-07-09 Cooled radiofrequency ablation of the genicular nerves for chronic pain due to osteoarthritis of the knee: a cost-effectiveness analysis based on trial data Desai, Mehul Bentley, Anthony Keck, William A. Haag, Thomas Taylor, Rod S. Dakin, Helen BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: For patients with painful knee osteoarthritis, long-term symptomatic relief may improve quality of life. Cooled radiofrequency ablation (CRFA) has demonstrated significant improvements in pain, physical function and health-related quality of life compared with conservative therapy with intra-articular steroid (IAS) injections. This study aimed to establish the cost-effectiveness of CRFA compared with IAS for managing moderate to severe osteoarthritis-related knee pain, from the US Medicare system perspective. METHODS: We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis utilizing efficacy data (Oxford Knee Scores) from a randomized, crossover trial on CRFA (NCT02343003), which compared CRFA with IAS out to 6 and 12 months, and with IAS patients who subsequently crossed over to receive CRFA after 6 months. Outcomes included health benefits (quality-adjusted life-years [QALYs]), costs and cost-effectiveness (expressed as cost per QALY gained). QALYs were estimated by mapping Oxford Knee Scores to the EQ-5D generic utility measure using a validated algorithm. Secondary analyses explored differences in the settings of care and procedures used in-trial versus real-world clinical practice. RESULTS: CRFA resulted in an incremental QALY gain of 0.091 at an incremental cost of $1711, equating to a cost of US$18,773 per QALY gained over a 6-month time horizon versus IAS. Over a 12-month time horizon, the incremental QALY gain was 0.229 at the same incremental cost, equating to a cost of US$7462 per QALY gained versus IAS. Real-world cost assumptions resulted in modest increases in the cost per QALY gained to a maximum of US$21,166 and US$8296 at 6 and 12 months, respectively. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated that findings were robust to variations in efficacy and cost parameters. CONCLUSIONS: CRFA is a highly cost-effective treatment option for patients with osteoarthritis-related knee pain, compared with the US$100,000/QALY threshold typically used in the US. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12891-019-2681-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6593544/ /pubmed/31238925 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2681-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Desai, Mehul
Bentley, Anthony
Keck, William A.
Haag, Thomas
Taylor, Rod S.
Dakin, Helen
Cooled radiofrequency ablation of the genicular nerves for chronic pain due to osteoarthritis of the knee: a cost-effectiveness analysis based on trial data
title Cooled radiofrequency ablation of the genicular nerves for chronic pain due to osteoarthritis of the knee: a cost-effectiveness analysis based on trial data
title_full Cooled radiofrequency ablation of the genicular nerves for chronic pain due to osteoarthritis of the knee: a cost-effectiveness analysis based on trial data
title_fullStr Cooled radiofrequency ablation of the genicular nerves for chronic pain due to osteoarthritis of the knee: a cost-effectiveness analysis based on trial data
title_full_unstemmed Cooled radiofrequency ablation of the genicular nerves for chronic pain due to osteoarthritis of the knee: a cost-effectiveness analysis based on trial data
title_short Cooled radiofrequency ablation of the genicular nerves for chronic pain due to osteoarthritis of the knee: a cost-effectiveness analysis based on trial data
title_sort cooled radiofrequency ablation of the genicular nerves for chronic pain due to osteoarthritis of the knee: a cost-effectiveness analysis based on trial data
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6593544/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31238925
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2681-2
work_keys_str_mv AT desaimehul cooledradiofrequencyablationofthegenicularnervesforchronicpainduetoosteoarthritisofthekneeacosteffectivenessanalysisbasedontrialdata
AT bentleyanthony cooledradiofrequencyablationofthegenicularnervesforchronicpainduetoosteoarthritisofthekneeacosteffectivenessanalysisbasedontrialdata
AT keckwilliama cooledradiofrequencyablationofthegenicularnervesforchronicpainduetoosteoarthritisofthekneeacosteffectivenessanalysisbasedontrialdata
AT haagthomas cooledradiofrequencyablationofthegenicularnervesforchronicpainduetoosteoarthritisofthekneeacosteffectivenessanalysisbasedontrialdata
AT taylorrods cooledradiofrequencyablationofthegenicularnervesforchronicpainduetoosteoarthritisofthekneeacosteffectivenessanalysisbasedontrialdata
AT dakinhelen cooledradiofrequencyablationofthegenicularnervesforchronicpainduetoosteoarthritisofthekneeacosteffectivenessanalysisbasedontrialdata