Cargando…

Application of the community health worker model in adult asthma and COPD in the U.S.: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: With rising medical costs, stakeholders and healthcare professionals are exploring community-based solutions to relieve the burden of chronic diseases and reduce health care spending. The community health worker (CHW) model is one example that has proven effective in improving patient ou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Parekh, Trisha M., Copeland, Carla R., Dransfield, Mark T., Cherrington, Andrea
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6593583/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31242944
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-019-0878-7
_version_ 1783430080089817088
author Parekh, Trisha M.
Copeland, Carla R.
Dransfield, Mark T.
Cherrington, Andrea
author_facet Parekh, Trisha M.
Copeland, Carla R.
Dransfield, Mark T.
Cherrington, Andrea
author_sort Parekh, Trisha M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: With rising medical costs, stakeholders and healthcare professionals are exploring community-based solutions to relieve the burden of chronic diseases and reduce health care spending. The community health worker (CHW) model is one example that has proven effective in improving patient outcomes globally. We sought to systematically describe the effectiveness of community health worker interventions in improving patient reported outcomes and reducing healthcare utilization in the adult asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) populations in the U.S. METHODS: Studies were included if they were a randomized control trial or involved a pre-post intervention comparison with clearly stated disease specific outcomes, targeted adult patients with asthma or COPD, and were performed in the United States. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. The review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) criteria and was registered with PROSPERO. RESULT: The search yielded 4013 potential articles, of which 47 were chosen for full-text review and 4 were chosen for inclusion; all focused on asthma and three had a comparison group. CHW interventions demonstrated improvement in asthma-related quality of life, asthma control, home trigger scores, and asthma symptom free days. There were no studies that reported COPD specific outcomes as a result of CHW interventions. CONCLUSION: Emerging evidence suggests CHW interventions may improve some aspects of asthma related disease burden in adults, however additional studies with consistent outcome measures are needed to confirm their effectiveness. Further research is also warranted to evaluate the use of community health workers in the COPD population. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12890-019-0878-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6593583
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65935832019-07-09 Application of the community health worker model in adult asthma and COPD in the U.S.: a systematic review Parekh, Trisha M. Copeland, Carla R. Dransfield, Mark T. Cherrington, Andrea BMC Pulm Med Research Article BACKGROUND: With rising medical costs, stakeholders and healthcare professionals are exploring community-based solutions to relieve the burden of chronic diseases and reduce health care spending. The community health worker (CHW) model is one example that has proven effective in improving patient outcomes globally. We sought to systematically describe the effectiveness of community health worker interventions in improving patient reported outcomes and reducing healthcare utilization in the adult asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) populations in the U.S. METHODS: Studies were included if they were a randomized control trial or involved a pre-post intervention comparison with clearly stated disease specific outcomes, targeted adult patients with asthma or COPD, and were performed in the United States. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. The review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) criteria and was registered with PROSPERO. RESULT: The search yielded 4013 potential articles, of which 47 were chosen for full-text review and 4 were chosen for inclusion; all focused on asthma and three had a comparison group. CHW interventions demonstrated improvement in asthma-related quality of life, asthma control, home trigger scores, and asthma symptom free days. There were no studies that reported COPD specific outcomes as a result of CHW interventions. CONCLUSION: Emerging evidence suggests CHW interventions may improve some aspects of asthma related disease burden in adults, however additional studies with consistent outcome measures are needed to confirm their effectiveness. Further research is also warranted to evaluate the use of community health workers in the COPD population. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12890-019-0878-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6593583/ /pubmed/31242944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-019-0878-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Parekh, Trisha M.
Copeland, Carla R.
Dransfield, Mark T.
Cherrington, Andrea
Application of the community health worker model in adult asthma and COPD in the U.S.: a systematic review
title Application of the community health worker model in adult asthma and COPD in the U.S.: a systematic review
title_full Application of the community health worker model in adult asthma and COPD in the U.S.: a systematic review
title_fullStr Application of the community health worker model in adult asthma and COPD in the U.S.: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Application of the community health worker model in adult asthma and COPD in the U.S.: a systematic review
title_short Application of the community health worker model in adult asthma and COPD in the U.S.: a systematic review
title_sort application of the community health worker model in adult asthma and copd in the u.s.: a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6593583/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31242944
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-019-0878-7
work_keys_str_mv AT parekhtrisham applicationofthecommunityhealthworkermodelinadultasthmaandcopdintheusasystematicreview
AT copelandcarlar applicationofthecommunityhealthworkermodelinadultasthmaandcopdintheusasystematicreview
AT dransfieldmarkt applicationofthecommunityhealthworkermodelinadultasthmaandcopdintheusasystematicreview
AT cherringtonandrea applicationofthecommunityhealthworkermodelinadultasthmaandcopdintheusasystematicreview