Cargando…

Office workers’ experiences of attempts to reduce sitting-time: an exploratory, mixed-methods uncontrolled intervention pilot study

BACKGROUND: Office workers typically sit for most of the workday, which has been linked to physical and mental ill-health and premature death. This mixed-methods study sought to identify barriers and facilitators to reducing sitting and increasing standing among office workers who received an interv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dewitt, Stephen, Hall, Jennifer, Smith, Lee, Buckley, John P., Biddle, Stuart J. H., Mansfield, Louise, Gardner, Benjamin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6593587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31238902
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7196-0
_version_ 1783430081059749888
author Dewitt, Stephen
Hall, Jennifer
Smith, Lee
Buckley, John P.
Biddle, Stuart J. H.
Mansfield, Louise
Gardner, Benjamin
author_facet Dewitt, Stephen
Hall, Jennifer
Smith, Lee
Buckley, John P.
Biddle, Stuart J. H.
Mansfield, Louise
Gardner, Benjamin
author_sort Dewitt, Stephen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Office workers typically sit for most of the workday, which has been linked to physical and mental ill-health and premature death. This mixed-methods study sought to identify barriers and facilitators to reducing sitting and increasing standing among office workers who received an intervention prototype (the ‘ReSiT [Reducing Sitting Time] Study’). The intervention comprised a sit-stand workstation and tailored advice to enhance motivation, capability and opportunity to displace sitting with standing. METHODS: Twenty-nine UK university office workers (aged ≥18y, working ≥3 days per week, most time spent at a seated desk) participated in a 13-week uncontrolled study. They were initially monitored for one-week. In a subsequent face-to-face consultation, participants received sitting time feedback from a prior one-week monitoring period, and selected from a set of tailored sitting-reduction techniques. Quantitative data comprising sitting, standing and stepping time, which were objectively monitored for 7 consecutive days across three post-intervention timepoints, were descriptively analysed. Qualitative data, from semi-structured interviews conducted at 1, 6 and 12-weeks post-intervention, were thematically analysed. RESULTS: Compared to baseline, mean sitting time decreased at weeks 1, 6 and 12 by 49.7mins, 118.2mins, and 109.7mins respectively. Despite prior concerns about colleagues’ reactions to standing, many reported encouragement from others, and standing could be equally conducive to social interaction or creating private, personal space. Some perceived less cognitively-demanding tasks to be more conducive to standing, though some found standing offered a valued break from challenging tasks. Participants prioritised workload over sitting reduction and were more likely to stand after rather than during work task completion. Temporary context changes, such as holidays, threatened to derail newfound routines. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings emphasise the importance of understanding workers’ mental representations of their work, and the social functions of sitting and standing in the workplace. Workplace intervention developers should incorporate a pre-intervention sitting time monitoring period, encourage workers to identify personally meaningful tasks and cues for standing, and build organisational support for sitting-reduction. We will use these insights to refine our intervention for self-administered delivery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN29395780 (registered 21 November 2016). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-019-7196-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6593587
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65935872019-07-09 Office workers’ experiences of attempts to reduce sitting-time: an exploratory, mixed-methods uncontrolled intervention pilot study Dewitt, Stephen Hall, Jennifer Smith, Lee Buckley, John P. Biddle, Stuart J. H. Mansfield, Louise Gardner, Benjamin BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Office workers typically sit for most of the workday, which has been linked to physical and mental ill-health and premature death. This mixed-methods study sought to identify barriers and facilitators to reducing sitting and increasing standing among office workers who received an intervention prototype (the ‘ReSiT [Reducing Sitting Time] Study’). The intervention comprised a sit-stand workstation and tailored advice to enhance motivation, capability and opportunity to displace sitting with standing. METHODS: Twenty-nine UK university office workers (aged ≥18y, working ≥3 days per week, most time spent at a seated desk) participated in a 13-week uncontrolled study. They were initially monitored for one-week. In a subsequent face-to-face consultation, participants received sitting time feedback from a prior one-week monitoring period, and selected from a set of tailored sitting-reduction techniques. Quantitative data comprising sitting, standing and stepping time, which were objectively monitored for 7 consecutive days across three post-intervention timepoints, were descriptively analysed. Qualitative data, from semi-structured interviews conducted at 1, 6 and 12-weeks post-intervention, were thematically analysed. RESULTS: Compared to baseline, mean sitting time decreased at weeks 1, 6 and 12 by 49.7mins, 118.2mins, and 109.7mins respectively. Despite prior concerns about colleagues’ reactions to standing, many reported encouragement from others, and standing could be equally conducive to social interaction or creating private, personal space. Some perceived less cognitively-demanding tasks to be more conducive to standing, though some found standing offered a valued break from challenging tasks. Participants prioritised workload over sitting reduction and were more likely to stand after rather than during work task completion. Temporary context changes, such as holidays, threatened to derail newfound routines. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings emphasise the importance of understanding workers’ mental representations of their work, and the social functions of sitting and standing in the workplace. Workplace intervention developers should incorporate a pre-intervention sitting time monitoring period, encourage workers to identify personally meaningful tasks and cues for standing, and build organisational support for sitting-reduction. We will use these insights to refine our intervention for self-administered delivery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN29395780 (registered 21 November 2016). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-019-7196-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6593587/ /pubmed/31238902 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7196-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Dewitt, Stephen
Hall, Jennifer
Smith, Lee
Buckley, John P.
Biddle, Stuart J. H.
Mansfield, Louise
Gardner, Benjamin
Office workers’ experiences of attempts to reduce sitting-time: an exploratory, mixed-methods uncontrolled intervention pilot study
title Office workers’ experiences of attempts to reduce sitting-time: an exploratory, mixed-methods uncontrolled intervention pilot study
title_full Office workers’ experiences of attempts to reduce sitting-time: an exploratory, mixed-methods uncontrolled intervention pilot study
title_fullStr Office workers’ experiences of attempts to reduce sitting-time: an exploratory, mixed-methods uncontrolled intervention pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Office workers’ experiences of attempts to reduce sitting-time: an exploratory, mixed-methods uncontrolled intervention pilot study
title_short Office workers’ experiences of attempts to reduce sitting-time: an exploratory, mixed-methods uncontrolled intervention pilot study
title_sort office workers’ experiences of attempts to reduce sitting-time: an exploratory, mixed-methods uncontrolled intervention pilot study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6593587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31238902
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7196-0
work_keys_str_mv AT dewittstephen officeworkersexperiencesofattemptstoreducesittingtimeanexploratorymixedmethodsuncontrolledinterventionpilotstudy
AT halljennifer officeworkersexperiencesofattemptstoreducesittingtimeanexploratorymixedmethodsuncontrolledinterventionpilotstudy
AT smithlee officeworkersexperiencesofattemptstoreducesittingtimeanexploratorymixedmethodsuncontrolledinterventionpilotstudy
AT buckleyjohnp officeworkersexperiencesofattemptstoreducesittingtimeanexploratorymixedmethodsuncontrolledinterventionpilotstudy
AT biddlestuartjh officeworkersexperiencesofattemptstoreducesittingtimeanexploratorymixedmethodsuncontrolledinterventionpilotstudy
AT mansfieldlouise officeworkersexperiencesofattemptstoreducesittingtimeanexploratorymixedmethodsuncontrolledinterventionpilotstudy
AT gardnerbenjamin officeworkersexperiencesofattemptstoreducesittingtimeanexploratorymixedmethodsuncontrolledinterventionpilotstudy