Cargando…

Magnitude‐intrinsic water–fat ambiguity can be resolved with multipeak fat modeling and a multipoint search method

PURPOSE: To develop a postprocessing algorithm for multiecho chemical‐shift encoded water–fat separation that estimates proton density fat fraction (PDFF) maps over the full dynamic range (0‐100%) using multipeak fat modeling and multipoint search optimization. To assess its accuracy, reproducibilit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Triay Bagur, Alexandre, Hutton, Chloe, Irving, Benjamin, Gyngell, Michael L., Robson, Matthew D., Brady, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6593794/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30874334
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.27728
_version_ 1783430125808779264
author Triay Bagur, Alexandre
Hutton, Chloe
Irving, Benjamin
Gyngell, Michael L.
Robson, Matthew D.
Brady, Michael
author_facet Triay Bagur, Alexandre
Hutton, Chloe
Irving, Benjamin
Gyngell, Michael L.
Robson, Matthew D.
Brady, Michael
author_sort Triay Bagur, Alexandre
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To develop a postprocessing algorithm for multiecho chemical‐shift encoded water–fat separation that estimates proton density fat fraction (PDFF) maps over the full dynamic range (0‐100%) using multipeak fat modeling and multipoint search optimization. To assess its accuracy, reproducibility, and agreement with state‐of‐the‐art complex‐based methods, and to evaluate its robustness to artefacts in abdominal PDFF maps. METHODS: We introduce MAGO (MAGnitude‐Only), a magnitude‐based reconstruction that embodies multipeak liver fat spectral modeling and multipoint optimization, and which is compatible with asymmetric echo acquisitions. MAGO is assessed first for accuracy and reproducibility on publicly available phantom data. Then, MAGO is applied to N = 178 UK Biobank cases, in which its liver PDFF measures are compared using Bland‐Altman analysis with those from a version of the hybrid iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least squares estimation (IDEAL) algorithm, LiverMultiScan IDEAL (LMS IDEAL, Perspectum Diagnostics Ltd, Oxford, UK). Finally, MAGO is tested on a succession of high field challenging cases for which LMS IDEAL generated artefacts in the PDFF maps. RESULTS: Phantom data showed accurate, reproducible MAGO PDFF values across manufacturers, field strengths, and acquisition protocols. Moreover, we report excellent agreement between MAGO and LMS IDEAL for 6‐echo, 1.5 tesla human acquisitions (bias = −0.02% PDFF, 95% confidence interval = ±0.13% PDFF). When tested on 12‐echo, 3 tesla cases from different manufacturers, MAGO was shown to be more robust to artefacts compared to LMS IDEAL. CONCLUSION: MAGO resolves the water–fat ambiguity over the entire fat fraction dynamic range without compromising accuracy, therefore enabling robust PDFF estimation where phase data is inaccessible or unreliable and complex‐based and hybrid methods fail.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6593794
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65937942019-07-10 Magnitude‐intrinsic water–fat ambiguity can be resolved with multipeak fat modeling and a multipoint search method Triay Bagur, Alexandre Hutton, Chloe Irving, Benjamin Gyngell, Michael L. Robson, Matthew D. Brady, Michael Magn Reson Med Full Papers—Computer Processing and Modeling PURPOSE: To develop a postprocessing algorithm for multiecho chemical‐shift encoded water–fat separation that estimates proton density fat fraction (PDFF) maps over the full dynamic range (0‐100%) using multipeak fat modeling and multipoint search optimization. To assess its accuracy, reproducibility, and agreement with state‐of‐the‐art complex‐based methods, and to evaluate its robustness to artefacts in abdominal PDFF maps. METHODS: We introduce MAGO (MAGnitude‐Only), a magnitude‐based reconstruction that embodies multipeak liver fat spectral modeling and multipoint optimization, and which is compatible with asymmetric echo acquisitions. MAGO is assessed first for accuracy and reproducibility on publicly available phantom data. Then, MAGO is applied to N = 178 UK Biobank cases, in which its liver PDFF measures are compared using Bland‐Altman analysis with those from a version of the hybrid iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least squares estimation (IDEAL) algorithm, LiverMultiScan IDEAL (LMS IDEAL, Perspectum Diagnostics Ltd, Oxford, UK). Finally, MAGO is tested on a succession of high field challenging cases for which LMS IDEAL generated artefacts in the PDFF maps. RESULTS: Phantom data showed accurate, reproducible MAGO PDFF values across manufacturers, field strengths, and acquisition protocols. Moreover, we report excellent agreement between MAGO and LMS IDEAL for 6‐echo, 1.5 tesla human acquisitions (bias = −0.02% PDFF, 95% confidence interval = ±0.13% PDFF). When tested on 12‐echo, 3 tesla cases from different manufacturers, MAGO was shown to be more robust to artefacts compared to LMS IDEAL. CONCLUSION: MAGO resolves the water–fat ambiguity over the entire fat fraction dynamic range without compromising accuracy, therefore enabling robust PDFF estimation where phase data is inaccessible or unreliable and complex‐based and hybrid methods fail. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-03-15 2019-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6593794/ /pubmed/30874334 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.27728 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Full Papers—Computer Processing and Modeling
Triay Bagur, Alexandre
Hutton, Chloe
Irving, Benjamin
Gyngell, Michael L.
Robson, Matthew D.
Brady, Michael
Magnitude‐intrinsic water–fat ambiguity can be resolved with multipeak fat modeling and a multipoint search method
title Magnitude‐intrinsic water–fat ambiguity can be resolved with multipeak fat modeling and a multipoint search method
title_full Magnitude‐intrinsic water–fat ambiguity can be resolved with multipeak fat modeling and a multipoint search method
title_fullStr Magnitude‐intrinsic water–fat ambiguity can be resolved with multipeak fat modeling and a multipoint search method
title_full_unstemmed Magnitude‐intrinsic water–fat ambiguity can be resolved with multipeak fat modeling and a multipoint search method
title_short Magnitude‐intrinsic water–fat ambiguity can be resolved with multipeak fat modeling and a multipoint search method
title_sort magnitude‐intrinsic water–fat ambiguity can be resolved with multipeak fat modeling and a multipoint search method
topic Full Papers—Computer Processing and Modeling
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6593794/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30874334
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.27728
work_keys_str_mv AT triaybaguralexandre magnitudeintrinsicwaterfatambiguitycanberesolvedwithmultipeakfatmodelingandamultipointsearchmethod
AT huttonchloe magnitudeintrinsicwaterfatambiguitycanberesolvedwithmultipeakfatmodelingandamultipointsearchmethod
AT irvingbenjamin magnitudeintrinsicwaterfatambiguitycanberesolvedwithmultipeakfatmodelingandamultipointsearchmethod
AT gyngellmichaell magnitudeintrinsicwaterfatambiguitycanberesolvedwithmultipeakfatmodelingandamultipointsearchmethod
AT robsonmatthewd magnitudeintrinsicwaterfatambiguitycanberesolvedwithmultipeakfatmodelingandamultipointsearchmethod
AT bradymichael magnitudeintrinsicwaterfatambiguitycanberesolvedwithmultipeakfatmodelingandamultipointsearchmethod