Cargando…
Diagnosing lanolin contact allergy with lanolin alcohol and Amerchol L101
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of lanolin contact allergy in dermatitis patients varies from 1.2% to 6.9%. Different lanolin derivatives are used in patch testing. OBJECTIVES: To determine which combination of lanolin derivatives is most effective in patch testing for the diagnosis of lanolin contact al...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6593808/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30624788 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cod.13210 |
_version_ | 1783430129148493824 |
---|---|
author | Knijp, Jannet Bruynzeel, Derk P. Rustemeyer, Thomas |
author_facet | Knijp, Jannet Bruynzeel, Derk P. Rustemeyer, Thomas |
author_sort | Knijp, Jannet |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The prevalence of lanolin contact allergy in dermatitis patients varies from 1.2% to 6.9%. Different lanolin derivatives are used in patch testing. OBJECTIVES: To determine which combination of lanolin derivatives is most effective in patch testing for the diagnosis of lanolin contact allergy. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients patch tested between 2016 and 2017 was performed. Patients were eligible if they had been tested with lanolin alcohol 30% pet., Amerchol L101 50% pet., and a supplementary series containing other lanolin derivatives. Lanolin alcohol and Amerchol L101 were tested in duplicate. RESULTS: Of 594 patients, 28.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 25.1%‐32.3%) had a positive patch test reaction to at least one lanolin derivative. Reactions to lanolin alcohol (14.7%, 95%CI: 11.3%‐18.2%) and Amerchol L101 (15.0%, 95%CI: 11.5%‐18.5%) were common in the routinely tested series. Reactions to other test preparations were significantly less frequent (P < 0.05). The addition of Amerchol L101 to lanolin alcohol significantly increased the number of positive cases (odds ratio 1.79, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of lanolin alcohol and Amerchol L101 is effective in patch testing for the diagnosis of lanolin contact allergy. Routinely testing with other lanolin derivatives may not be worthwhile, as it detects only a few additional patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6593808 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65938082019-07-10 Diagnosing lanolin contact allergy with lanolin alcohol and Amerchol L101 Knijp, Jannet Bruynzeel, Derk P. Rustemeyer, Thomas Contact Dermatitis Original Articles BACKGROUND: The prevalence of lanolin contact allergy in dermatitis patients varies from 1.2% to 6.9%. Different lanolin derivatives are used in patch testing. OBJECTIVES: To determine which combination of lanolin derivatives is most effective in patch testing for the diagnosis of lanolin contact allergy. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients patch tested between 2016 and 2017 was performed. Patients were eligible if they had been tested with lanolin alcohol 30% pet., Amerchol L101 50% pet., and a supplementary series containing other lanolin derivatives. Lanolin alcohol and Amerchol L101 were tested in duplicate. RESULTS: Of 594 patients, 28.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 25.1%‐32.3%) had a positive patch test reaction to at least one lanolin derivative. Reactions to lanolin alcohol (14.7%, 95%CI: 11.3%‐18.2%) and Amerchol L101 (15.0%, 95%CI: 11.5%‐18.5%) were common in the routinely tested series. Reactions to other test preparations were significantly less frequent (P < 0.05). The addition of Amerchol L101 to lanolin alcohol significantly increased the number of positive cases (odds ratio 1.79, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of lanolin alcohol and Amerchol L101 is effective in patch testing for the diagnosis of lanolin contact allergy. Routinely testing with other lanolin derivatives may not be worthwhile, as it detects only a few additional patients. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2019-03-19 2019-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6593808/ /pubmed/30624788 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cod.13210 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Contact Dermatitis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Knijp, Jannet Bruynzeel, Derk P. Rustemeyer, Thomas Diagnosing lanolin contact allergy with lanolin alcohol and Amerchol L101 |
title | Diagnosing lanolin contact allergy with lanolin alcohol and Amerchol L101 |
title_full | Diagnosing lanolin contact allergy with lanolin alcohol and Amerchol L101 |
title_fullStr | Diagnosing lanolin contact allergy with lanolin alcohol and Amerchol L101 |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnosing lanolin contact allergy with lanolin alcohol and Amerchol L101 |
title_short | Diagnosing lanolin contact allergy with lanolin alcohol and Amerchol L101 |
title_sort | diagnosing lanolin contact allergy with lanolin alcohol and amerchol l101 |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6593808/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30624788 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cod.13210 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT knijpjannet diagnosinglanolincontactallergywithlanolinalcoholandamercholl101 AT bruynzeelderkp diagnosinglanolincontactallergywithlanolinalcoholandamercholl101 AT rustemeyerthomas diagnosinglanolincontactallergywithlanolinalcoholandamercholl101 |