Cargando…

The minimum clinically important difference: which direction to take

Over the past decades in modern medicine, there has been a shift from statistical significance to clinical relevance when it comes to interpreting results from clinical trials. A concept that is increasingly being used as a surrogate for clinical relevance and effect size calculation is the minimum...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Draak, T. H. P., de Greef, B. T. A., Faber, C. G., Merkies, I. S. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6593833/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30793428
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ene.13941
_version_ 1783430135080288256
author Draak, T. H. P.
de Greef, B. T. A.
Faber, C. G.
Merkies, I. S. J.
author_facet Draak, T. H. P.
de Greef, B. T. A.
Faber, C. G.
Merkies, I. S. J.
author_sort Draak, T. H. P.
collection PubMed
description Over the past decades in modern medicine, there has been a shift from statistical significance to clinical relevance when it comes to interpreting results from clinical trials. A concept that is increasingly being used as a surrogate for clinical relevance and effect size calculation is the minimum clinically important difference (MCID). In this paper, an overview is presented of the most important aspects of the MCID concept used in research trials and a discussion of what this means for the neurological patient in clinical trials and daily practice is given. Is the MCID the best outcome measure cut‐off to be implemented?
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6593833
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65938332019-07-10 The minimum clinically important difference: which direction to take Draak, T. H. P. de Greef, B. T. A. Faber, C. G. Merkies, I. S. J. Eur J Neurol Review Article Over the past decades in modern medicine, there has been a shift from statistical significance to clinical relevance when it comes to interpreting results from clinical trials. A concept that is increasingly being used as a surrogate for clinical relevance and effect size calculation is the minimum clinically important difference (MCID). In this paper, an overview is presented of the most important aspects of the MCID concept used in research trials and a discussion of what this means for the neurological patient in clinical trials and daily practice is given. Is the MCID the best outcome measure cut‐off to be implemented? John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-03-25 2019-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6593833/ /pubmed/30793428 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ene.13941 Text en © 2019 The Authors. European Journal of Neurology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Neurology. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Review Article
Draak, T. H. P.
de Greef, B. T. A.
Faber, C. G.
Merkies, I. S. J.
The minimum clinically important difference: which direction to take
title The minimum clinically important difference: which direction to take
title_full The minimum clinically important difference: which direction to take
title_fullStr The minimum clinically important difference: which direction to take
title_full_unstemmed The minimum clinically important difference: which direction to take
title_short The minimum clinically important difference: which direction to take
title_sort minimum clinically important difference: which direction to take
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6593833/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30793428
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ene.13941
work_keys_str_mv AT draakthp theminimumclinicallyimportantdifferencewhichdirectiontotake
AT degreefbta theminimumclinicallyimportantdifferencewhichdirectiontotake
AT fabercg theminimumclinicallyimportantdifferencewhichdirectiontotake
AT merkiesisj theminimumclinicallyimportantdifferencewhichdirectiontotake
AT theminimumclinicallyimportantdifferencewhichdirectiontotake
AT draakthp minimumclinicallyimportantdifferencewhichdirectiontotake
AT degreefbta minimumclinicallyimportantdifferencewhichdirectiontotake
AT fabercg minimumclinicallyimportantdifferencewhichdirectiontotake
AT merkiesisj minimumclinicallyimportantdifferencewhichdirectiontotake
AT minimumclinicallyimportantdifferencewhichdirectiontotake