Cargando…

Prevalence and clinical significance of regional lymphadenectomy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND: A limited amount of literature involves the clinical significance of regional lymphadenectomy during operations on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. Our study aims to explore regional lymphadenectomy rate and node‐positive rate, as well as their clinicopathological relevance and p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Anli, Xiao, Weikai, Ju, Weiqiang, Liao, Yuan, Chen, Maogen, Zhu, Xiaofeng, Wu, Chenglin, He, Xiaoshun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6593848/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30856685
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ans.15096
_version_ 1783430138681098240
author Yang, Anli
Xiao, Weikai
Ju, Weiqiang
Liao, Yuan
Chen, Maogen
Zhu, Xiaofeng
Wu, Chenglin
He, Xiaoshun
author_facet Yang, Anli
Xiao, Weikai
Ju, Weiqiang
Liao, Yuan
Chen, Maogen
Zhu, Xiaofeng
Wu, Chenglin
He, Xiaoshun
author_sort Yang, Anli
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A limited amount of literature involves the clinical significance of regional lymphadenectomy during operations on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. Our study aims to explore regional lymphadenectomy rate and node‐positive rate, as well as their clinicopathological relevance and prognostic values in patients with HCC receiving liver resection (LR) and liver transplantation (LT). METHODS: Patients with HCC who received LR or LT and were diagnosed from 2004 to 2013 were retrieved from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. A total of 6367 patients with staging and regional lymphadenectomy information was included. RESULTS: The regional lymphadenectomy rates were 14.3% and 28.6% in patients receiving LR and LT, respectively. Additionally, the rate of LT patients increased from 21.3% to 33.3% in the 2004–2013 time period. In patients with regional lymphadenectomy, node‐positive rates were 8.4% and 0.9% in LR and LT patients, respectively. Regional lymphadenectomy was conducted relatively non‐specifically in patients receiving LT compared with those receiving LR by analysing its clinicopathological relevance. Furthermore, regional lymphadenectomy did not improve prognosis in the general population or any subgroup. CONCLUSION: There was a disparity between high regional lymphadenectomy rate and extremely low node‐positive rate in patients with HCC receiving LT, which requires further improvement in future clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6593848
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65938482019-07-10 Prevalence and clinical significance of regional lymphadenectomy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma Yang, Anli Xiao, Weikai Ju, Weiqiang Liao, Yuan Chen, Maogen Zhu, Xiaofeng Wu, Chenglin He, Xiaoshun ANZ J Surg Hepatopancreaticobiliary Surgery BACKGROUND: A limited amount of literature involves the clinical significance of regional lymphadenectomy during operations on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. Our study aims to explore regional lymphadenectomy rate and node‐positive rate, as well as their clinicopathological relevance and prognostic values in patients with HCC receiving liver resection (LR) and liver transplantation (LT). METHODS: Patients with HCC who received LR or LT and were diagnosed from 2004 to 2013 were retrieved from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. A total of 6367 patients with staging and regional lymphadenectomy information was included. RESULTS: The regional lymphadenectomy rates were 14.3% and 28.6% in patients receiving LR and LT, respectively. Additionally, the rate of LT patients increased from 21.3% to 33.3% in the 2004–2013 time period. In patients with regional lymphadenectomy, node‐positive rates were 8.4% and 0.9% in LR and LT patients, respectively. Regional lymphadenectomy was conducted relatively non‐specifically in patients receiving LT compared with those receiving LR by analysing its clinicopathological relevance. Furthermore, regional lymphadenectomy did not improve prognosis in the general population or any subgroup. CONCLUSION: There was a disparity between high regional lymphadenectomy rate and extremely low node‐positive rate in patients with HCC receiving LT, which requires further improvement in future clinical practice. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2019-03-11 2019-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6593848/ /pubmed/30856685 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ans.15096 Text en © 2019 The Authors. ANZ Journal of Surgery published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Royal Australasian College of Surgeons This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Hepatopancreaticobiliary Surgery
Yang, Anli
Xiao, Weikai
Ju, Weiqiang
Liao, Yuan
Chen, Maogen
Zhu, Xiaofeng
Wu, Chenglin
He, Xiaoshun
Prevalence and clinical significance of regional lymphadenectomy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma
title Prevalence and clinical significance of regional lymphadenectomy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma
title_full Prevalence and clinical significance of regional lymphadenectomy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma
title_fullStr Prevalence and clinical significance of regional lymphadenectomy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence and clinical significance of regional lymphadenectomy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma
title_short Prevalence and clinical significance of regional lymphadenectomy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma
title_sort prevalence and clinical significance of regional lymphadenectomy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma
topic Hepatopancreaticobiliary Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6593848/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30856685
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ans.15096
work_keys_str_mv AT yanganli prevalenceandclinicalsignificanceofregionallymphadenectomyinpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT xiaoweikai prevalenceandclinicalsignificanceofregionallymphadenectomyinpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT juweiqiang prevalenceandclinicalsignificanceofregionallymphadenectomyinpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT liaoyuan prevalenceandclinicalsignificanceofregionallymphadenectomyinpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT chenmaogen prevalenceandclinicalsignificanceofregionallymphadenectomyinpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT zhuxiaofeng prevalenceandclinicalsignificanceofregionallymphadenectomyinpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT wuchenglin prevalenceandclinicalsignificanceofregionallymphadenectomyinpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT hexiaoshun prevalenceandclinicalsignificanceofregionallymphadenectomyinpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinoma