Cargando…

Assessing patient‐reported outcomes for automated insulin delivery systems: the psychometric properties of the INSPIRE measures

AIM: Participants in clinical trials assessing automated insulin delivery systems report perceived benefits and burdens that reflect their experiences and may predict their likelihood of uptake and continued use of this novel technology. Despite the importance of understanding their perspectives, th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weissberg‐Benchell, J., Shapiro, J. B., Hood, K., Laffel, L. M., Naranjo, D., Miller, K., Barnard, K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6593869/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30761592
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dme.13930
_version_ 1783430143621988352
author Weissberg‐Benchell, J.
Shapiro, J. B.
Hood, K.
Laffel, L. M.
Naranjo, D.
Miller, K.
Barnard, K.
author_facet Weissberg‐Benchell, J.
Shapiro, J. B.
Hood, K.
Laffel, L. M.
Naranjo, D.
Miller, K.
Barnard, K.
author_sort Weissberg‐Benchell, J.
collection PubMed
description AIM: Participants in clinical trials assessing automated insulin delivery systems report perceived benefits and burdens that reflect their experiences and may predict their likelihood of uptake and continued use of this novel technology. Despite the importance of understanding their perspectives, there are no available validated and reliable measures assessing the psychosocial aspects of automated insulin delivery systems. The present study assesses the initial psychometric properties of the INSPIRE measures, which were developed for youth and adults with Type 1 diabetes, as well as parents and partners. METHODS: Data from 292 youth, 159 adults, 150 parents of youth and 149 partners of individuals recruited from the Type 1 Diabetes Exchange Registry were analysed. Participants completed INSPIRE questionnaires and measures of quality of life, fear of hypoglycaemia, diabetes distress, glucose monitoring satisfaction. Exploratory factor analysis assessed factor structures. Associations between INSPIRE scores and other measures, HbA(1c), and technology use assessed concurrent and discriminant validity. RESULTS: Youth, adult, parent and partner measures assess positive expectancies of automated insulin delivery systems. Measures range from 17 to 22 items and are reliable (α = 0.95–0.97). Youth, adult and parent measures are unidimensional; the partner measure has a two‐factor structure (perceptions of impact on partners versus the person with diabetes). Measures showed concurrent and discriminant validity. CONCLUSIONS: INSPIRE measures assessing the positive expectancies of automated insulin delivery systems for youth, adults, parents and partners have meaningful factor structures and are internally consistent. The developmentally sensitive INSPIRE measures offer added value as clinical trials test newer systems, systems become commercially available and clinicians initiate using these systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6593869
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65938692019-07-10 Assessing patient‐reported outcomes for automated insulin delivery systems: the psychometric properties of the INSPIRE measures Weissberg‐Benchell, J. Shapiro, J. B. Hood, K. Laffel, L. M. Naranjo, D. Miller, K. Barnard, K. Diabet Med Research Articles AIM: Participants in clinical trials assessing automated insulin delivery systems report perceived benefits and burdens that reflect their experiences and may predict their likelihood of uptake and continued use of this novel technology. Despite the importance of understanding their perspectives, there are no available validated and reliable measures assessing the psychosocial aspects of automated insulin delivery systems. The present study assesses the initial psychometric properties of the INSPIRE measures, which were developed for youth and adults with Type 1 diabetes, as well as parents and partners. METHODS: Data from 292 youth, 159 adults, 150 parents of youth and 149 partners of individuals recruited from the Type 1 Diabetes Exchange Registry were analysed. Participants completed INSPIRE questionnaires and measures of quality of life, fear of hypoglycaemia, diabetes distress, glucose monitoring satisfaction. Exploratory factor analysis assessed factor structures. Associations between INSPIRE scores and other measures, HbA(1c), and technology use assessed concurrent and discriminant validity. RESULTS: Youth, adult, parent and partner measures assess positive expectancies of automated insulin delivery systems. Measures range from 17 to 22 items and are reliable (α = 0.95–0.97). Youth, adult and parent measures are unidimensional; the partner measure has a two‐factor structure (perceptions of impact on partners versus the person with diabetes). Measures showed concurrent and discriminant validity. CONCLUSIONS: INSPIRE measures assessing the positive expectancies of automated insulin delivery systems for youth, adults, parents and partners have meaningful factor structures and are internally consistent. The developmentally sensitive INSPIRE measures offer added value as clinical trials test newer systems, systems become commercially available and clinicians initiate using these systems. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-03-20 2019-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6593869/ /pubmed/30761592 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dme.13930 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Diabetic Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Diabetes UK This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Weissberg‐Benchell, J.
Shapiro, J. B.
Hood, K.
Laffel, L. M.
Naranjo, D.
Miller, K.
Barnard, K.
Assessing patient‐reported outcomes for automated insulin delivery systems: the psychometric properties of the INSPIRE measures
title Assessing patient‐reported outcomes for automated insulin delivery systems: the psychometric properties of the INSPIRE measures
title_full Assessing patient‐reported outcomes for automated insulin delivery systems: the psychometric properties of the INSPIRE measures
title_fullStr Assessing patient‐reported outcomes for automated insulin delivery systems: the psychometric properties of the INSPIRE measures
title_full_unstemmed Assessing patient‐reported outcomes for automated insulin delivery systems: the psychometric properties of the INSPIRE measures
title_short Assessing patient‐reported outcomes for automated insulin delivery systems: the psychometric properties of the INSPIRE measures
title_sort assessing patient‐reported outcomes for automated insulin delivery systems: the psychometric properties of the inspire measures
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6593869/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30761592
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dme.13930
work_keys_str_mv AT weissbergbenchellj assessingpatientreportedoutcomesforautomatedinsulindeliverysystemsthepsychometricpropertiesoftheinspiremeasures
AT shapirojb assessingpatientreportedoutcomesforautomatedinsulindeliverysystemsthepsychometricpropertiesoftheinspiremeasures
AT hoodk assessingpatientreportedoutcomesforautomatedinsulindeliverysystemsthepsychometricpropertiesoftheinspiremeasures
AT laffellm assessingpatientreportedoutcomesforautomatedinsulindeliverysystemsthepsychometricpropertiesoftheinspiremeasures
AT naranjod assessingpatientreportedoutcomesforautomatedinsulindeliverysystemsthepsychometricpropertiesoftheinspiremeasures
AT millerk assessingpatientreportedoutcomesforautomatedinsulindeliverysystemsthepsychometricpropertiesoftheinspiremeasures
AT barnardk assessingpatientreportedoutcomesforautomatedinsulindeliverysystemsthepsychometricpropertiesoftheinspiremeasures