Cargando…
Integrative Analysis Defines Distinct Prognostic Subgroups of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is the second most common primary liver cancer. It is defined by cholangiocytic differentiation and has poor prognosis. Recently, epigenetic processes have been shown to play an important role in cholangiocarcinogenesis. We performed an integrative analysis on...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6594081/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30615206 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hep.30493 |
_version_ | 1783430184977825792 |
---|---|
author | Goeppert, Benjamin Toth, Reka Singer, Stephan Albrecht, Thomas Lipka, Daniel B. Lutsik, Pavlo Brocks, David Baehr, Marion Muecke, Oliver Assenov, Yassen Gu, Lei Endris, Volker Stenzinger, Albrecht Mehrabi, Arianeb Schirmacher, Peter Plass, Christoph Weichenhan, Dieter Roessler, Stephanie |
author_facet | Goeppert, Benjamin Toth, Reka Singer, Stephan Albrecht, Thomas Lipka, Daniel B. Lutsik, Pavlo Brocks, David Baehr, Marion Muecke, Oliver Assenov, Yassen Gu, Lei Endris, Volker Stenzinger, Albrecht Mehrabi, Arianeb Schirmacher, Peter Plass, Christoph Weichenhan, Dieter Roessler, Stephanie |
author_sort | Goeppert, Benjamin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is the second most common primary liver cancer. It is defined by cholangiocytic differentiation and has poor prognosis. Recently, epigenetic processes have been shown to play an important role in cholangiocarcinogenesis. We performed an integrative analysis on 52 iCCAs using both genetic and epigenetic data with a specific focus on DNA methylation components. We found recurrent isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) and IDH2 (28%) gene mutations, recurrent arm‐length copy number alterations (CNAs), and focal alterations such as deletion of 3p21 or amplification of 12q15, which affect BRCA1 Associated Protein 1, polybromo 1, and mouse double minute 2 homolog. DNA methylome analysis revealed excessive hypermethylation of iCCA, affecting primarily the bivalent genomic regions marked with both active and repressive histone modifications. Integrative clustering of genetic and epigenetic data identified four iCCA subgroups with prognostic relevance further designated as IDH, high (H), medium (M), and low (L) alteration groups. The IDH group consisted of all samples with IDH1 or IDH2 mutations and showed, together with the H group, a highly disrupted genome, characterized by frequent deletions of chromosome arms 3p and 6q. Both groups showed excessive hypermethylation with distinct patterns. The M group showed intermediate characteristics regarding both genetic and epigenetic marks, whereas the L group exhibited few methylation changes and mutations and a lack of CNAs. Methylation‐based latent component analysis of cell‐type composition identified differences among these four groups. Prognosis of the H and M groups was significantly worse than that of the L group. Conclusion: Using an integrative genomic and epigenomic analysis approach, we identified four major iCCA subgroups with widespread genomic and epigenomic differences and prognostic implications. Furthermore, our data suggest differences in the cell‐of‐origin of the iCCA subtypes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6594081 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65940812019-07-10 Integrative Analysis Defines Distinct Prognostic Subgroups of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Goeppert, Benjamin Toth, Reka Singer, Stephan Albrecht, Thomas Lipka, Daniel B. Lutsik, Pavlo Brocks, David Baehr, Marion Muecke, Oliver Assenov, Yassen Gu, Lei Endris, Volker Stenzinger, Albrecht Mehrabi, Arianeb Schirmacher, Peter Plass, Christoph Weichenhan, Dieter Roessler, Stephanie Hepatology Original Articles Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is the second most common primary liver cancer. It is defined by cholangiocytic differentiation and has poor prognosis. Recently, epigenetic processes have been shown to play an important role in cholangiocarcinogenesis. We performed an integrative analysis on 52 iCCAs using both genetic and epigenetic data with a specific focus on DNA methylation components. We found recurrent isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) and IDH2 (28%) gene mutations, recurrent arm‐length copy number alterations (CNAs), and focal alterations such as deletion of 3p21 or amplification of 12q15, which affect BRCA1 Associated Protein 1, polybromo 1, and mouse double minute 2 homolog. DNA methylome analysis revealed excessive hypermethylation of iCCA, affecting primarily the bivalent genomic regions marked with both active and repressive histone modifications. Integrative clustering of genetic and epigenetic data identified four iCCA subgroups with prognostic relevance further designated as IDH, high (H), medium (M), and low (L) alteration groups. The IDH group consisted of all samples with IDH1 or IDH2 mutations and showed, together with the H group, a highly disrupted genome, characterized by frequent deletions of chromosome arms 3p and 6q. Both groups showed excessive hypermethylation with distinct patterns. The M group showed intermediate characteristics regarding both genetic and epigenetic marks, whereas the L group exhibited few methylation changes and mutations and a lack of CNAs. Methylation‐based latent component analysis of cell‐type composition identified differences among these four groups. Prognosis of the H and M groups was significantly worse than that of the L group. Conclusion: Using an integrative genomic and epigenomic analysis approach, we identified four major iCCA subgroups with widespread genomic and epigenomic differences and prognostic implications. Furthermore, our data suggest differences in the cell‐of‐origin of the iCCA subtypes. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-02-28 2019-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6594081/ /pubmed/30615206 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hep.30493 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Hepatology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc., on behalf of American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Goeppert, Benjamin Toth, Reka Singer, Stephan Albrecht, Thomas Lipka, Daniel B. Lutsik, Pavlo Brocks, David Baehr, Marion Muecke, Oliver Assenov, Yassen Gu, Lei Endris, Volker Stenzinger, Albrecht Mehrabi, Arianeb Schirmacher, Peter Plass, Christoph Weichenhan, Dieter Roessler, Stephanie Integrative Analysis Defines Distinct Prognostic Subgroups of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma |
title | Integrative Analysis Defines Distinct Prognostic Subgroups of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma |
title_full | Integrative Analysis Defines Distinct Prognostic Subgroups of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma |
title_fullStr | Integrative Analysis Defines Distinct Prognostic Subgroups of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma |
title_full_unstemmed | Integrative Analysis Defines Distinct Prognostic Subgroups of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma |
title_short | Integrative Analysis Defines Distinct Prognostic Subgroups of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma |
title_sort | integrative analysis defines distinct prognostic subgroups of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6594081/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30615206 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hep.30493 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT goeppertbenjamin integrativeanalysisdefinesdistinctprognosticsubgroupsofintrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma AT tothreka integrativeanalysisdefinesdistinctprognosticsubgroupsofintrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma AT singerstephan integrativeanalysisdefinesdistinctprognosticsubgroupsofintrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma AT albrechtthomas integrativeanalysisdefinesdistinctprognosticsubgroupsofintrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma AT lipkadanielb integrativeanalysisdefinesdistinctprognosticsubgroupsofintrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma AT lutsikpavlo integrativeanalysisdefinesdistinctprognosticsubgroupsofintrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma AT brocksdavid integrativeanalysisdefinesdistinctprognosticsubgroupsofintrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma AT baehrmarion integrativeanalysisdefinesdistinctprognosticsubgroupsofintrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma AT mueckeoliver integrativeanalysisdefinesdistinctprognosticsubgroupsofintrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma AT assenovyassen integrativeanalysisdefinesdistinctprognosticsubgroupsofintrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma AT gulei integrativeanalysisdefinesdistinctprognosticsubgroupsofintrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma AT endrisvolker integrativeanalysisdefinesdistinctprognosticsubgroupsofintrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma AT stenzingeralbrecht integrativeanalysisdefinesdistinctprognosticsubgroupsofintrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma AT mehrabiarianeb integrativeanalysisdefinesdistinctprognosticsubgroupsofintrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma AT schirmacherpeter integrativeanalysisdefinesdistinctprognosticsubgroupsofintrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma AT plasschristoph integrativeanalysisdefinesdistinctprognosticsubgroupsofintrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma AT weichenhandieter integrativeanalysisdefinesdistinctprognosticsubgroupsofintrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma AT roesslerstephanie integrativeanalysisdefinesdistinctprognosticsubgroupsofintrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma |