Cargando…

Integrative Analysis Defines Distinct Prognostic Subgroups of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is the second most common primary liver cancer. It is defined by cholangiocytic differentiation and has poor prognosis. Recently, epigenetic processes have been shown to play an important role in cholangiocarcinogenesis. We performed an integrative analysis on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goeppert, Benjamin, Toth, Reka, Singer, Stephan, Albrecht, Thomas, Lipka, Daniel B., Lutsik, Pavlo, Brocks, David, Baehr, Marion, Muecke, Oliver, Assenov, Yassen, Gu, Lei, Endris, Volker, Stenzinger, Albrecht, Mehrabi, Arianeb, Schirmacher, Peter, Plass, Christoph, Weichenhan, Dieter, Roessler, Stephanie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6594081/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30615206
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hep.30493
_version_ 1783430184977825792
author Goeppert, Benjamin
Toth, Reka
Singer, Stephan
Albrecht, Thomas
Lipka, Daniel B.
Lutsik, Pavlo
Brocks, David
Baehr, Marion
Muecke, Oliver
Assenov, Yassen
Gu, Lei
Endris, Volker
Stenzinger, Albrecht
Mehrabi, Arianeb
Schirmacher, Peter
Plass, Christoph
Weichenhan, Dieter
Roessler, Stephanie
author_facet Goeppert, Benjamin
Toth, Reka
Singer, Stephan
Albrecht, Thomas
Lipka, Daniel B.
Lutsik, Pavlo
Brocks, David
Baehr, Marion
Muecke, Oliver
Assenov, Yassen
Gu, Lei
Endris, Volker
Stenzinger, Albrecht
Mehrabi, Arianeb
Schirmacher, Peter
Plass, Christoph
Weichenhan, Dieter
Roessler, Stephanie
author_sort Goeppert, Benjamin
collection PubMed
description Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is the second most common primary liver cancer. It is defined by cholangiocytic differentiation and has poor prognosis. Recently, epigenetic processes have been shown to play an important role in cholangiocarcinogenesis. We performed an integrative analysis on 52 iCCAs using both genetic and epigenetic data with a specific focus on DNA methylation components. We found recurrent isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) and IDH2 (28%) gene mutations, recurrent arm‐length copy number alterations (CNAs), and focal alterations such as deletion of 3p21 or amplification of 12q15, which affect BRCA1 Associated Protein 1, polybromo 1, and mouse double minute 2 homolog. DNA methylome analysis revealed excessive hypermethylation of iCCA, affecting primarily the bivalent genomic regions marked with both active and repressive histone modifications. Integrative clustering of genetic and epigenetic data identified four iCCA subgroups with prognostic relevance further designated as IDH, high (H), medium (M), and low (L) alteration groups. The IDH group consisted of all samples with IDH1 or IDH2 mutations and showed, together with the H group, a highly disrupted genome, characterized by frequent deletions of chromosome arms 3p and 6q. Both groups showed excessive hypermethylation with distinct patterns. The M group showed intermediate characteristics regarding both genetic and epigenetic marks, whereas the L group exhibited few methylation changes and mutations and a lack of CNAs. Methylation‐based latent component analysis of cell‐type composition identified differences among these four groups. Prognosis of the H and M groups was significantly worse than that of the L group. Conclusion: Using an integrative genomic and epigenomic analysis approach, we identified four major iCCA subgroups with widespread genomic and epigenomic differences and prognostic implications. Furthermore, our data suggest differences in the cell‐of‐origin of the iCCA subtypes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6594081
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65940812019-07-10 Integrative Analysis Defines Distinct Prognostic Subgroups of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Goeppert, Benjamin Toth, Reka Singer, Stephan Albrecht, Thomas Lipka, Daniel B. Lutsik, Pavlo Brocks, David Baehr, Marion Muecke, Oliver Assenov, Yassen Gu, Lei Endris, Volker Stenzinger, Albrecht Mehrabi, Arianeb Schirmacher, Peter Plass, Christoph Weichenhan, Dieter Roessler, Stephanie Hepatology Original Articles Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is the second most common primary liver cancer. It is defined by cholangiocytic differentiation and has poor prognosis. Recently, epigenetic processes have been shown to play an important role in cholangiocarcinogenesis. We performed an integrative analysis on 52 iCCAs using both genetic and epigenetic data with a specific focus on DNA methylation components. We found recurrent isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) and IDH2 (28%) gene mutations, recurrent arm‐length copy number alterations (CNAs), and focal alterations such as deletion of 3p21 or amplification of 12q15, which affect BRCA1 Associated Protein 1, polybromo 1, and mouse double minute 2 homolog. DNA methylome analysis revealed excessive hypermethylation of iCCA, affecting primarily the bivalent genomic regions marked with both active and repressive histone modifications. Integrative clustering of genetic and epigenetic data identified four iCCA subgroups with prognostic relevance further designated as IDH, high (H), medium (M), and low (L) alteration groups. The IDH group consisted of all samples with IDH1 or IDH2 mutations and showed, together with the H group, a highly disrupted genome, characterized by frequent deletions of chromosome arms 3p and 6q. Both groups showed excessive hypermethylation with distinct patterns. The M group showed intermediate characteristics regarding both genetic and epigenetic marks, whereas the L group exhibited few methylation changes and mutations and a lack of CNAs. Methylation‐based latent component analysis of cell‐type composition identified differences among these four groups. Prognosis of the H and M groups was significantly worse than that of the L group. Conclusion: Using an integrative genomic and epigenomic analysis approach, we identified four major iCCA subgroups with widespread genomic and epigenomic differences and prognostic implications. Furthermore, our data suggest differences in the cell‐of‐origin of the iCCA subtypes. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-02-28 2019-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6594081/ /pubmed/30615206 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hep.30493 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Hepatology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc., on behalf of American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Goeppert, Benjamin
Toth, Reka
Singer, Stephan
Albrecht, Thomas
Lipka, Daniel B.
Lutsik, Pavlo
Brocks, David
Baehr, Marion
Muecke, Oliver
Assenov, Yassen
Gu, Lei
Endris, Volker
Stenzinger, Albrecht
Mehrabi, Arianeb
Schirmacher, Peter
Plass, Christoph
Weichenhan, Dieter
Roessler, Stephanie
Integrative Analysis Defines Distinct Prognostic Subgroups of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma
title Integrative Analysis Defines Distinct Prognostic Subgroups of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma
title_full Integrative Analysis Defines Distinct Prognostic Subgroups of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma
title_fullStr Integrative Analysis Defines Distinct Prognostic Subgroups of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Integrative Analysis Defines Distinct Prognostic Subgroups of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma
title_short Integrative Analysis Defines Distinct Prognostic Subgroups of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma
title_sort integrative analysis defines distinct prognostic subgroups of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6594081/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30615206
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hep.30493
work_keys_str_mv AT goeppertbenjamin integrativeanalysisdefinesdistinctprognosticsubgroupsofintrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma
AT tothreka integrativeanalysisdefinesdistinctprognosticsubgroupsofintrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma
AT singerstephan integrativeanalysisdefinesdistinctprognosticsubgroupsofintrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma
AT albrechtthomas integrativeanalysisdefinesdistinctprognosticsubgroupsofintrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma
AT lipkadanielb integrativeanalysisdefinesdistinctprognosticsubgroupsofintrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma
AT lutsikpavlo integrativeanalysisdefinesdistinctprognosticsubgroupsofintrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma
AT brocksdavid integrativeanalysisdefinesdistinctprognosticsubgroupsofintrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma
AT baehrmarion integrativeanalysisdefinesdistinctprognosticsubgroupsofintrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma
AT mueckeoliver integrativeanalysisdefinesdistinctprognosticsubgroupsofintrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma
AT assenovyassen integrativeanalysisdefinesdistinctprognosticsubgroupsofintrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma
AT gulei integrativeanalysisdefinesdistinctprognosticsubgroupsofintrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma
AT endrisvolker integrativeanalysisdefinesdistinctprognosticsubgroupsofintrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma
AT stenzingeralbrecht integrativeanalysisdefinesdistinctprognosticsubgroupsofintrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma
AT mehrabiarianeb integrativeanalysisdefinesdistinctprognosticsubgroupsofintrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma
AT schirmacherpeter integrativeanalysisdefinesdistinctprognosticsubgroupsofintrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma
AT plasschristoph integrativeanalysisdefinesdistinctprognosticsubgroupsofintrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma
AT weichenhandieter integrativeanalysisdefinesdistinctprognosticsubgroupsofintrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma
AT roesslerstephanie integrativeanalysisdefinesdistinctprognosticsubgroupsofintrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma