Cargando…
Comparison of Conventional Slow Freeze versus Permeable Cryoprotectant-Free Vitrification of Abnormal Semen Sample: A Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND: The cryopreservation of semen samples by slow freezing remains as standard protocol. Recently, vitrification of spermatozoa was successfully reported with superior outcome. Till date, there is no randomized trial comparing the two different protocols. AIM: The aim of the present study is...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6594128/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31293330 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_154_18 |
_version_ | 1783430194930909184 |
---|---|
author | Karthikeyan, Muthukumar Arakkal, Darshana Mangalaraj, Ann M. Kamath, Mohan S. |
author_facet | Karthikeyan, Muthukumar Arakkal, Darshana Mangalaraj, Ann M. Kamath, Mohan S. |
author_sort | Karthikeyan, Muthukumar |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The cryopreservation of semen samples by slow freezing remains as standard protocol. Recently, vitrification of spermatozoa was successfully reported with superior outcome. Till date, there is no randomized trial comparing the two different protocols. AIM: The aim of the present study is to evaluate the slow freezing with vitrification of the subfertile men spermatozoa to evaluate the progressive motility, vitality, and chromatin integrity. SETTING: The study was conducted at University teaching hospital. DESIGN: Study design involves randomized control trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty subfertile men with semen characteristics of severe oligoasthenozoospermia (SOA) and very SOA (VSOA) randomized to undergo slow freezing and vitrification protocol and cryopreserved at 1-month and 6-month storage interval, postthawed or warmed, samples were assessed for progressive motility, vitality, and hyaluronan binding. SPSS version 14 software was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The SOA samples at 1 month revealed significantly higher motility (42% [22%–74%] vs. 7% [1%–13%]; P = 0.015) and vitality (57% [45%–78%] vs. 34.5% [27–42]; P < 0.001) following vitrification compared to slow-freeze method. For Very severe oligoasthenozoospermia (VSOA), the motility was significantly higher following vitrification (14.5% [2%–32%] vs. 2.5% [0%–4%]; P = 0.007). At 6 months, no statistically significant difference in motility was found between the two groups for Severe Oligoasthenozoospermia (SOA) samples (27% [13%–62%] vs. 8% [0%–11%]; P = 0.066), but motility was significantly higher following vitrification for VSOA samples (12.5% [3%–32%] vs. 2% [1%–5%]; P = 0.019). The hyaluronan-binding assay was comparable in both the groups at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: The current study found the vitrification method involving the use of only nonpermeable cryoprotectants for cryopreservation of abnormal semen sample to be an effective alternative to the conventional slow-freeze technique. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6594128 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65941282019-07-10 Comparison of Conventional Slow Freeze versus Permeable Cryoprotectant-Free Vitrification of Abnormal Semen Sample: A Randomized Controlled Trial Karthikeyan, Muthukumar Arakkal, Darshana Mangalaraj, Ann M. Kamath, Mohan S. J Hum Reprod Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: The cryopreservation of semen samples by slow freezing remains as standard protocol. Recently, vitrification of spermatozoa was successfully reported with superior outcome. Till date, there is no randomized trial comparing the two different protocols. AIM: The aim of the present study is to evaluate the slow freezing with vitrification of the subfertile men spermatozoa to evaluate the progressive motility, vitality, and chromatin integrity. SETTING: The study was conducted at University teaching hospital. DESIGN: Study design involves randomized control trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty subfertile men with semen characteristics of severe oligoasthenozoospermia (SOA) and very SOA (VSOA) randomized to undergo slow freezing and vitrification protocol and cryopreserved at 1-month and 6-month storage interval, postthawed or warmed, samples were assessed for progressive motility, vitality, and hyaluronan binding. SPSS version 14 software was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The SOA samples at 1 month revealed significantly higher motility (42% [22%–74%] vs. 7% [1%–13%]; P = 0.015) and vitality (57% [45%–78%] vs. 34.5% [27–42]; P < 0.001) following vitrification compared to slow-freeze method. For Very severe oligoasthenozoospermia (VSOA), the motility was significantly higher following vitrification (14.5% [2%–32%] vs. 2.5% [0%–4%]; P = 0.007). At 6 months, no statistically significant difference in motility was found between the two groups for Severe Oligoasthenozoospermia (SOA) samples (27% [13%–62%] vs. 8% [0%–11%]; P = 0.066), but motility was significantly higher following vitrification for VSOA samples (12.5% [3%–32%] vs. 2% [1%–5%]; P = 0.019). The hyaluronan-binding assay was comparable in both the groups at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: The current study found the vitrification method involving the use of only nonpermeable cryoprotectants for cryopreservation of abnormal semen sample to be an effective alternative to the conventional slow-freeze technique. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6594128/ /pubmed/31293330 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_154_18 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Karthikeyan, Muthukumar Arakkal, Darshana Mangalaraj, Ann M. Kamath, Mohan S. Comparison of Conventional Slow Freeze versus Permeable Cryoprotectant-Free Vitrification of Abnormal Semen Sample: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title | Comparison of Conventional Slow Freeze versus Permeable Cryoprotectant-Free Vitrification of Abnormal Semen Sample: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full | Comparison of Conventional Slow Freeze versus Permeable Cryoprotectant-Free Vitrification of Abnormal Semen Sample: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Conventional Slow Freeze versus Permeable Cryoprotectant-Free Vitrification of Abnormal Semen Sample: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Conventional Slow Freeze versus Permeable Cryoprotectant-Free Vitrification of Abnormal Semen Sample: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_short | Comparison of Conventional Slow Freeze versus Permeable Cryoprotectant-Free Vitrification of Abnormal Semen Sample: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_sort | comparison of conventional slow freeze versus permeable cryoprotectant-free vitrification of abnormal semen sample: a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6594128/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31293330 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_154_18 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT karthikeyanmuthukumar comparisonofconventionalslowfreezeversuspermeablecryoprotectantfreevitrificationofabnormalsemensamplearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT arakkaldarshana comparisonofconventionalslowfreezeversuspermeablecryoprotectantfreevitrificationofabnormalsemensamplearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT mangalarajannm comparisonofconventionalslowfreezeversuspermeablecryoprotectantfreevitrificationofabnormalsemensamplearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kamathmohans comparisonofconventionalslowfreezeversuspermeablecryoprotectantfreevitrificationofabnormalsemensamplearandomizedcontrolledtrial |