Cargando…

Comparison of Conventional Slow Freeze versus Permeable Cryoprotectant-Free Vitrification of Abnormal Semen Sample: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND: The cryopreservation of semen samples by slow freezing remains as standard protocol. Recently, vitrification of spermatozoa was successfully reported with superior outcome. Till date, there is no randomized trial comparing the two different protocols. AIM: The aim of the present study is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Karthikeyan, Muthukumar, Arakkal, Darshana, Mangalaraj, Ann M., Kamath, Mohan S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6594128/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31293330
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_154_18
_version_ 1783430194930909184
author Karthikeyan, Muthukumar
Arakkal, Darshana
Mangalaraj, Ann M.
Kamath, Mohan S.
author_facet Karthikeyan, Muthukumar
Arakkal, Darshana
Mangalaraj, Ann M.
Kamath, Mohan S.
author_sort Karthikeyan, Muthukumar
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The cryopreservation of semen samples by slow freezing remains as standard protocol. Recently, vitrification of spermatozoa was successfully reported with superior outcome. Till date, there is no randomized trial comparing the two different protocols. AIM: The aim of the present study is to evaluate the slow freezing with vitrification of the subfertile men spermatozoa to evaluate the progressive motility, vitality, and chromatin integrity. SETTING: The study was conducted at University teaching hospital. DESIGN: Study design involves randomized control trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty subfertile men with semen characteristics of severe oligoasthenozoospermia (SOA) and very SOA (VSOA) randomized to undergo slow freezing and vitrification protocol and cryopreserved at 1-month and 6-month storage interval, postthawed or warmed, samples were assessed for progressive motility, vitality, and hyaluronan binding. SPSS version 14 software was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The SOA samples at 1 month revealed significantly higher motility (42% [22%–74%] vs. 7% [1%–13%]; P = 0.015) and vitality (57% [45%–78%] vs. 34.5% [27–42]; P < 0.001) following vitrification compared to slow-freeze method. For Very severe oligoasthenozoospermia (VSOA), the motility was significantly higher following vitrification (14.5% [2%–32%] vs. 2.5% [0%–4%]; P = 0.007). At 6 months, no statistically significant difference in motility was found between the two groups for Severe Oligoasthenozoospermia (SOA) samples (27% [13%–62%] vs. 8% [0%–11%]; P = 0.066), but motility was significantly higher following vitrification for VSOA samples (12.5% [3%–32%] vs. 2% [1%–5%]; P = 0.019). The hyaluronan-binding assay was comparable in both the groups at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: The current study found the vitrification method involving the use of only nonpermeable cryoprotectants for cryopreservation of abnormal semen sample to be an effective alternative to the conventional slow-freeze technique.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6594128
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65941282019-07-10 Comparison of Conventional Slow Freeze versus Permeable Cryoprotectant-Free Vitrification of Abnormal Semen Sample: A Randomized Controlled Trial Karthikeyan, Muthukumar Arakkal, Darshana Mangalaraj, Ann M. Kamath, Mohan S. J Hum Reprod Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: The cryopreservation of semen samples by slow freezing remains as standard protocol. Recently, vitrification of spermatozoa was successfully reported with superior outcome. Till date, there is no randomized trial comparing the two different protocols. AIM: The aim of the present study is to evaluate the slow freezing with vitrification of the subfertile men spermatozoa to evaluate the progressive motility, vitality, and chromatin integrity. SETTING: The study was conducted at University teaching hospital. DESIGN: Study design involves randomized control trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty subfertile men with semen characteristics of severe oligoasthenozoospermia (SOA) and very SOA (VSOA) randomized to undergo slow freezing and vitrification protocol and cryopreserved at 1-month and 6-month storage interval, postthawed or warmed, samples were assessed for progressive motility, vitality, and hyaluronan binding. SPSS version 14 software was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The SOA samples at 1 month revealed significantly higher motility (42% [22%–74%] vs. 7% [1%–13%]; P = 0.015) and vitality (57% [45%–78%] vs. 34.5% [27–42]; P < 0.001) following vitrification compared to slow-freeze method. For Very severe oligoasthenozoospermia (VSOA), the motility was significantly higher following vitrification (14.5% [2%–32%] vs. 2.5% [0%–4%]; P = 0.007). At 6 months, no statistically significant difference in motility was found between the two groups for Severe Oligoasthenozoospermia (SOA) samples (27% [13%–62%] vs. 8% [0%–11%]; P = 0.066), but motility was significantly higher following vitrification for VSOA samples (12.5% [3%–32%] vs. 2% [1%–5%]; P = 0.019). The hyaluronan-binding assay was comparable in both the groups at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: The current study found the vitrification method involving the use of only nonpermeable cryoprotectants for cryopreservation of abnormal semen sample to be an effective alternative to the conventional slow-freeze technique. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6594128/ /pubmed/31293330 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_154_18 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Karthikeyan, Muthukumar
Arakkal, Darshana
Mangalaraj, Ann M.
Kamath, Mohan S.
Comparison of Conventional Slow Freeze versus Permeable Cryoprotectant-Free Vitrification of Abnormal Semen Sample: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title Comparison of Conventional Slow Freeze versus Permeable Cryoprotectant-Free Vitrification of Abnormal Semen Sample: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Comparison of Conventional Slow Freeze versus Permeable Cryoprotectant-Free Vitrification of Abnormal Semen Sample: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Comparison of Conventional Slow Freeze versus Permeable Cryoprotectant-Free Vitrification of Abnormal Semen Sample: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Conventional Slow Freeze versus Permeable Cryoprotectant-Free Vitrification of Abnormal Semen Sample: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Comparison of Conventional Slow Freeze versus Permeable Cryoprotectant-Free Vitrification of Abnormal Semen Sample: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort comparison of conventional slow freeze versus permeable cryoprotectant-free vitrification of abnormal semen sample: a randomized controlled trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6594128/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31293330
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_154_18
work_keys_str_mv AT karthikeyanmuthukumar comparisonofconventionalslowfreezeversuspermeablecryoprotectantfreevitrificationofabnormalsemensamplearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT arakkaldarshana comparisonofconventionalslowfreezeversuspermeablecryoprotectantfreevitrificationofabnormalsemensamplearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mangalarajannm comparisonofconventionalslowfreezeversuspermeablecryoprotectantfreevitrificationofabnormalsemensamplearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kamathmohans comparisonofconventionalslowfreezeversuspermeablecryoprotectantfreevitrificationofabnormalsemensamplearandomizedcontrolledtrial