Cargando…

The mixed model for the analysis of a repeated‐measurement multivariate count data

Clustered overdispersed multivariate count data are challenging to model due to the presence of correlation within and between samples. Typically, the first source of correlation needs to be addressed but its quantification is of less interest. Here, we focus on the correlation between time points....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martin, Ivonne, Uh, Hae‐Won, Supali, Taniawati, Mitreva, Makedonka, Houwing‐Duistermaat, Jeanine J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6594162/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30761571
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sim.8101
_version_ 1783430199623286784
author Martin, Ivonne
Uh, Hae‐Won
Supali, Taniawati
Mitreva, Makedonka
Houwing‐Duistermaat, Jeanine J.
author_facet Martin, Ivonne
Uh, Hae‐Won
Supali, Taniawati
Mitreva, Makedonka
Houwing‐Duistermaat, Jeanine J.
author_sort Martin, Ivonne
collection PubMed
description Clustered overdispersed multivariate count data are challenging to model due to the presence of correlation within and between samples. Typically, the first source of correlation needs to be addressed but its quantification is of less interest. Here, we focus on the correlation between time points. In addition, the effects of covariates on the multivariate counts distribution need to be assessed. To fulfill these requirements, a regression model based on the Dirichlet‐multinomial distribution for association between covariates and the categorical counts is extended by using random effects to deal with the additional clustering. This model is the Dirichlet‐multinomial mixed regression model. Alternatively, a negative binomial regression mixed model can be deployed where the corresponding likelihood is conditioned on the total count. It appears that these two approaches are equivalent when the total count is fixed and independent of the random effects. We consider both subject‐specific and categorical‐specific random effects. However, the latter has a larger computational burden when the number of categories increases. Our work is motivated by microbiome data sets obtained by sequencing of the amplicon of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene. These data have a compositional structure and are typically overdispersed. The microbiome data set is from an epidemiological study carried out in a helminth‐endemic area in Indonesia. The conclusions are as follows: time has no statistically significant effect on microbiome composition, the correlation between subjects is statistically significant, and treatment has a significant effect on the microbiome composition only in infected subjects who remained infected.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6594162
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65941622019-07-10 The mixed model for the analysis of a repeated‐measurement multivariate count data Martin, Ivonne Uh, Hae‐Won Supali, Taniawati Mitreva, Makedonka Houwing‐Duistermaat, Jeanine J. Stat Med Research Articles Clustered overdispersed multivariate count data are challenging to model due to the presence of correlation within and between samples. Typically, the first source of correlation needs to be addressed but its quantification is of less interest. Here, we focus on the correlation between time points. In addition, the effects of covariates on the multivariate counts distribution need to be assessed. To fulfill these requirements, a regression model based on the Dirichlet‐multinomial distribution for association between covariates and the categorical counts is extended by using random effects to deal with the additional clustering. This model is the Dirichlet‐multinomial mixed regression model. Alternatively, a negative binomial regression mixed model can be deployed where the corresponding likelihood is conditioned on the total count. It appears that these two approaches are equivalent when the total count is fixed and independent of the random effects. We consider both subject‐specific and categorical‐specific random effects. However, the latter has a larger computational burden when the number of categories increases. Our work is motivated by microbiome data sets obtained by sequencing of the amplicon of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene. These data have a compositional structure and are typically overdispersed. The microbiome data set is from an epidemiological study carried out in a helminth‐endemic area in Indonesia. The conclusions are as follows: time has no statistically significant effect on microbiome composition, the correlation between subjects is statistically significant, and treatment has a significant effect on the microbiome composition only in infected subjects who remained infected. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-02-13 2019-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6594162/ /pubmed/30761571 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sim.8101 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Statistics in Medicine Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Martin, Ivonne
Uh, Hae‐Won
Supali, Taniawati
Mitreva, Makedonka
Houwing‐Duistermaat, Jeanine J.
The mixed model for the analysis of a repeated‐measurement multivariate count data
title The mixed model for the analysis of a repeated‐measurement multivariate count data
title_full The mixed model for the analysis of a repeated‐measurement multivariate count data
title_fullStr The mixed model for the analysis of a repeated‐measurement multivariate count data
title_full_unstemmed The mixed model for the analysis of a repeated‐measurement multivariate count data
title_short The mixed model for the analysis of a repeated‐measurement multivariate count data
title_sort mixed model for the analysis of a repeated‐measurement multivariate count data
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6594162/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30761571
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sim.8101
work_keys_str_mv AT martinivonne themixedmodelfortheanalysisofarepeatedmeasurementmultivariatecountdata
AT uhhaewon themixedmodelfortheanalysisofarepeatedmeasurementmultivariatecountdata
AT supalitaniawati themixedmodelfortheanalysisofarepeatedmeasurementmultivariatecountdata
AT mitrevamakedonka themixedmodelfortheanalysisofarepeatedmeasurementmultivariatecountdata
AT houwingduistermaatjeaninej themixedmodelfortheanalysisofarepeatedmeasurementmultivariatecountdata
AT martinivonne mixedmodelfortheanalysisofarepeatedmeasurementmultivariatecountdata
AT uhhaewon mixedmodelfortheanalysisofarepeatedmeasurementmultivariatecountdata
AT supalitaniawati mixedmodelfortheanalysisofarepeatedmeasurementmultivariatecountdata
AT mitrevamakedonka mixedmodelfortheanalysisofarepeatedmeasurementmultivariatecountdata
AT houwingduistermaatjeaninej mixedmodelfortheanalysisofarepeatedmeasurementmultivariatecountdata