Cargando…

Impact of an Electronic App on Resident Responses to Simulated In-Flight Medical Emergencies: Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND: Health care providers are often called to respond to in-flight medical emergencies, but lack familiarity with expected supplies, interventions, and ground medical control support. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine whether a mobile phone app (airRx) improves response...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nadir, Nur-Ain, Cook, Courtney J, Bertino, Raymond E, Squillante, Marc D, Taylor, Cameron, Dragoo, David, Podolej, Gregory S, Svendsen, Jessica D, Fish, Jessica L, McGarvey, Jeremy S, Bond, William F
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6594212/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31199299
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/10955
_version_ 1783430204286304256
author Nadir, Nur-Ain
Cook, Courtney J
Bertino, Raymond E
Squillante, Marc D
Taylor, Cameron
Dragoo, David
Podolej, Gregory S
Svendsen, Jessica D
Fish, Jessica L
McGarvey, Jeremy S
Bond, William F
author_facet Nadir, Nur-Ain
Cook, Courtney J
Bertino, Raymond E
Squillante, Marc D
Taylor, Cameron
Dragoo, David
Podolej, Gregory S
Svendsen, Jessica D
Fish, Jessica L
McGarvey, Jeremy S
Bond, William F
author_sort Nadir, Nur-Ain
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Health care providers are often called to respond to in-flight medical emergencies, but lack familiarity with expected supplies, interventions, and ground medical control support. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine whether a mobile phone app (airRx) improves responses to simulated in-flight medical emergencies. METHODS: This was a randomized study of volunteer, nonemergency resident physician participants who managed simulated in-flight medical emergencies with or without the app. Simulations took place in a mock-up cabin in the simulation center. Standardized participants played the patient, family member, and flight attendant roles. Live, nonblinded rating was used with occasional video review for data clarification. Participants participated in two simulated in-flight medical emergencies (shortness of breath and syncope) and were evaluated with checklists and global rating scales (GRS). Checklist item success rates, key critical action times, GRS, and pre-post simulation confidence in managing in-flight medical emergencies were compared. RESULTS: There were 29 participants in each arm (app vs control; N=58) of the study. Mean percentages of completed checklist items for the app versus control groups were mean 56.1 (SD 10.3) versus mean 49.4 (SD 7.4) for shortness of breath (P=.001) and mean 58 (SD 8.1) versus mean 49.8 (SD 7.0) for syncope (P<.001). The GRS improved with the app for the syncope case (mean 3.14, SD 0.89 versus control mean 2.6, SD 0.97; P=.003), but not the shortness of breath case (mean 2.90, SD 0.97 versus control mean 2.81, SD 0.80; P=.43). For timed checklist items, the app group contacted ground support faster for both cases, but the control group was faster to complete vitals and basic exam. Both groups indicated higher confidence in their postsimulation surveys, but the app group demonstrated a greater increase in this measure. CONCLUSIONS: Use of the airRx app prompted some actions, but delayed others. Simulated performance and feedback suggest the app is a useful adjunct for managing in-flight medical emergencies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6594212
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65942122019-07-17 Impact of an Electronic App on Resident Responses to Simulated In-Flight Medical Emergencies: Randomized Controlled Trial Nadir, Nur-Ain Cook, Courtney J Bertino, Raymond E Squillante, Marc D Taylor, Cameron Dragoo, David Podolej, Gregory S Svendsen, Jessica D Fish, Jessica L McGarvey, Jeremy S Bond, William F JMIR Med Educ Original Paper BACKGROUND: Health care providers are often called to respond to in-flight medical emergencies, but lack familiarity with expected supplies, interventions, and ground medical control support. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine whether a mobile phone app (airRx) improves responses to simulated in-flight medical emergencies. METHODS: This was a randomized study of volunteer, nonemergency resident physician participants who managed simulated in-flight medical emergencies with or without the app. Simulations took place in a mock-up cabin in the simulation center. Standardized participants played the patient, family member, and flight attendant roles. Live, nonblinded rating was used with occasional video review for data clarification. Participants participated in two simulated in-flight medical emergencies (shortness of breath and syncope) and were evaluated with checklists and global rating scales (GRS). Checklist item success rates, key critical action times, GRS, and pre-post simulation confidence in managing in-flight medical emergencies were compared. RESULTS: There were 29 participants in each arm (app vs control; N=58) of the study. Mean percentages of completed checklist items for the app versus control groups were mean 56.1 (SD 10.3) versus mean 49.4 (SD 7.4) for shortness of breath (P=.001) and mean 58 (SD 8.1) versus mean 49.8 (SD 7.0) for syncope (P<.001). The GRS improved with the app for the syncope case (mean 3.14, SD 0.89 versus control mean 2.6, SD 0.97; P=.003), but not the shortness of breath case (mean 2.90, SD 0.97 versus control mean 2.81, SD 0.80; P=.43). For timed checklist items, the app group contacted ground support faster for both cases, but the control group was faster to complete vitals and basic exam. Both groups indicated higher confidence in their postsimulation surveys, but the app group demonstrated a greater increase in this measure. CONCLUSIONS: Use of the airRx app prompted some actions, but delayed others. Simulated performance and feedback suggest the app is a useful adjunct for managing in-flight medical emergencies. JMIR Publications 2019-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6594212/ /pubmed/31199299 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/10955 Text en ©Nur-Ain Nadir, Courtney J Cook, Raymond E Bertino, Marc D Squillante, Cameron Taylor, David Dragoo, Gregory S Podolej, Jessica D Svendsen, Jessica L Fish, Jeremy S McGarvey, William F Bond. Originally published in JMIR Medical Education (http://mededu.jmir.org), 07.06.2019. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Medical Education, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://mededu.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Nadir, Nur-Ain
Cook, Courtney J
Bertino, Raymond E
Squillante, Marc D
Taylor, Cameron
Dragoo, David
Podolej, Gregory S
Svendsen, Jessica D
Fish, Jessica L
McGarvey, Jeremy S
Bond, William F
Impact of an Electronic App on Resident Responses to Simulated In-Flight Medical Emergencies: Randomized Controlled Trial
title Impact of an Electronic App on Resident Responses to Simulated In-Flight Medical Emergencies: Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Impact of an Electronic App on Resident Responses to Simulated In-Flight Medical Emergencies: Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Impact of an Electronic App on Resident Responses to Simulated In-Flight Medical Emergencies: Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Impact of an Electronic App on Resident Responses to Simulated In-Flight Medical Emergencies: Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Impact of an Electronic App on Resident Responses to Simulated In-Flight Medical Emergencies: Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort impact of an electronic app on resident responses to simulated in-flight medical emergencies: randomized controlled trial
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6594212/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31199299
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/10955
work_keys_str_mv AT nadirnurain impactofanelectronicapponresidentresponsestosimulatedinflightmedicalemergenciesrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT cookcourtneyj impactofanelectronicapponresidentresponsestosimulatedinflightmedicalemergenciesrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bertinoraymonde impactofanelectronicapponresidentresponsestosimulatedinflightmedicalemergenciesrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT squillantemarcd impactofanelectronicapponresidentresponsestosimulatedinflightmedicalemergenciesrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT taylorcameron impactofanelectronicapponresidentresponsestosimulatedinflightmedicalemergenciesrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT dragoodavid impactofanelectronicapponresidentresponsestosimulatedinflightmedicalemergenciesrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT podolejgregorys impactofanelectronicapponresidentresponsestosimulatedinflightmedicalemergenciesrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT svendsenjessicad impactofanelectronicapponresidentresponsestosimulatedinflightmedicalemergenciesrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT fishjessical impactofanelectronicapponresidentresponsestosimulatedinflightmedicalemergenciesrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mcgarveyjeremys impactofanelectronicapponresidentresponsestosimulatedinflightmedicalemergenciesrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bondwilliamf impactofanelectronicapponresidentresponsestosimulatedinflightmedicalemergenciesrandomizedcontrolledtrial