Cargando…
Impact of an Electronic App on Resident Responses to Simulated In-Flight Medical Emergencies: Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND: Health care providers are often called to respond to in-flight medical emergencies, but lack familiarity with expected supplies, interventions, and ground medical control support. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine whether a mobile phone app (airRx) improves response...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6594212/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31199299 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/10955 |
_version_ | 1783430204286304256 |
---|---|
author | Nadir, Nur-Ain Cook, Courtney J Bertino, Raymond E Squillante, Marc D Taylor, Cameron Dragoo, David Podolej, Gregory S Svendsen, Jessica D Fish, Jessica L McGarvey, Jeremy S Bond, William F |
author_facet | Nadir, Nur-Ain Cook, Courtney J Bertino, Raymond E Squillante, Marc D Taylor, Cameron Dragoo, David Podolej, Gregory S Svendsen, Jessica D Fish, Jessica L McGarvey, Jeremy S Bond, William F |
author_sort | Nadir, Nur-Ain |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Health care providers are often called to respond to in-flight medical emergencies, but lack familiarity with expected supplies, interventions, and ground medical control support. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine whether a mobile phone app (airRx) improves responses to simulated in-flight medical emergencies. METHODS: This was a randomized study of volunteer, nonemergency resident physician participants who managed simulated in-flight medical emergencies with or without the app. Simulations took place in a mock-up cabin in the simulation center. Standardized participants played the patient, family member, and flight attendant roles. Live, nonblinded rating was used with occasional video review for data clarification. Participants participated in two simulated in-flight medical emergencies (shortness of breath and syncope) and were evaluated with checklists and global rating scales (GRS). Checklist item success rates, key critical action times, GRS, and pre-post simulation confidence in managing in-flight medical emergencies were compared. RESULTS: There were 29 participants in each arm (app vs control; N=58) of the study. Mean percentages of completed checklist items for the app versus control groups were mean 56.1 (SD 10.3) versus mean 49.4 (SD 7.4) for shortness of breath (P=.001) and mean 58 (SD 8.1) versus mean 49.8 (SD 7.0) for syncope (P<.001). The GRS improved with the app for the syncope case (mean 3.14, SD 0.89 versus control mean 2.6, SD 0.97; P=.003), but not the shortness of breath case (mean 2.90, SD 0.97 versus control mean 2.81, SD 0.80; P=.43). For timed checklist items, the app group contacted ground support faster for both cases, but the control group was faster to complete vitals and basic exam. Both groups indicated higher confidence in their postsimulation surveys, but the app group demonstrated a greater increase in this measure. CONCLUSIONS: Use of the airRx app prompted some actions, but delayed others. Simulated performance and feedback suggest the app is a useful adjunct for managing in-flight medical emergencies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6594212 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65942122019-07-17 Impact of an Electronic App on Resident Responses to Simulated In-Flight Medical Emergencies: Randomized Controlled Trial Nadir, Nur-Ain Cook, Courtney J Bertino, Raymond E Squillante, Marc D Taylor, Cameron Dragoo, David Podolej, Gregory S Svendsen, Jessica D Fish, Jessica L McGarvey, Jeremy S Bond, William F JMIR Med Educ Original Paper BACKGROUND: Health care providers are often called to respond to in-flight medical emergencies, but lack familiarity with expected supplies, interventions, and ground medical control support. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine whether a mobile phone app (airRx) improves responses to simulated in-flight medical emergencies. METHODS: This was a randomized study of volunteer, nonemergency resident physician participants who managed simulated in-flight medical emergencies with or without the app. Simulations took place in a mock-up cabin in the simulation center. Standardized participants played the patient, family member, and flight attendant roles. Live, nonblinded rating was used with occasional video review for data clarification. Participants participated in two simulated in-flight medical emergencies (shortness of breath and syncope) and were evaluated with checklists and global rating scales (GRS). Checklist item success rates, key critical action times, GRS, and pre-post simulation confidence in managing in-flight medical emergencies were compared. RESULTS: There were 29 participants in each arm (app vs control; N=58) of the study. Mean percentages of completed checklist items for the app versus control groups were mean 56.1 (SD 10.3) versus mean 49.4 (SD 7.4) for shortness of breath (P=.001) and mean 58 (SD 8.1) versus mean 49.8 (SD 7.0) for syncope (P<.001). The GRS improved with the app for the syncope case (mean 3.14, SD 0.89 versus control mean 2.6, SD 0.97; P=.003), but not the shortness of breath case (mean 2.90, SD 0.97 versus control mean 2.81, SD 0.80; P=.43). For timed checklist items, the app group contacted ground support faster for both cases, but the control group was faster to complete vitals and basic exam. Both groups indicated higher confidence in their postsimulation surveys, but the app group demonstrated a greater increase in this measure. CONCLUSIONS: Use of the airRx app prompted some actions, but delayed others. Simulated performance and feedback suggest the app is a useful adjunct for managing in-flight medical emergencies. JMIR Publications 2019-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6594212/ /pubmed/31199299 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/10955 Text en ©Nur-Ain Nadir, Courtney J Cook, Raymond E Bertino, Marc D Squillante, Cameron Taylor, David Dragoo, Gregory S Podolej, Jessica D Svendsen, Jessica L Fish, Jeremy S McGarvey, William F Bond. Originally published in JMIR Medical Education (http://mededu.jmir.org), 07.06.2019. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Medical Education, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://mededu.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Nadir, Nur-Ain Cook, Courtney J Bertino, Raymond E Squillante, Marc D Taylor, Cameron Dragoo, David Podolej, Gregory S Svendsen, Jessica D Fish, Jessica L McGarvey, Jeremy S Bond, William F Impact of an Electronic App on Resident Responses to Simulated In-Flight Medical Emergencies: Randomized Controlled Trial |
title | Impact of an Electronic App on Resident Responses to Simulated In-Flight Medical Emergencies: Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full | Impact of an Electronic App on Resident Responses to Simulated In-Flight Medical Emergencies: Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_fullStr | Impact of an Electronic App on Resident Responses to Simulated In-Flight Medical Emergencies: Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of an Electronic App on Resident Responses to Simulated In-Flight Medical Emergencies: Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_short | Impact of an Electronic App on Resident Responses to Simulated In-Flight Medical Emergencies: Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_sort | impact of an electronic app on resident responses to simulated in-flight medical emergencies: randomized controlled trial |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6594212/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31199299 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/10955 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nadirnurain impactofanelectronicapponresidentresponsestosimulatedinflightmedicalemergenciesrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT cookcourtneyj impactofanelectronicapponresidentresponsestosimulatedinflightmedicalemergenciesrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT bertinoraymonde impactofanelectronicapponresidentresponsestosimulatedinflightmedicalemergenciesrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT squillantemarcd impactofanelectronicapponresidentresponsestosimulatedinflightmedicalemergenciesrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT taylorcameron impactofanelectronicapponresidentresponsestosimulatedinflightmedicalemergenciesrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT dragoodavid impactofanelectronicapponresidentresponsestosimulatedinflightmedicalemergenciesrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT podolejgregorys impactofanelectronicapponresidentresponsestosimulatedinflightmedicalemergenciesrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT svendsenjessicad impactofanelectronicapponresidentresponsestosimulatedinflightmedicalemergenciesrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT fishjessical impactofanelectronicapponresidentresponsestosimulatedinflightmedicalemergenciesrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT mcgarveyjeremys impactofanelectronicapponresidentresponsestosimulatedinflightmedicalemergenciesrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT bondwilliamf impactofanelectronicapponresidentresponsestosimulatedinflightmedicalemergenciesrandomizedcontrolledtrial |