Cargando…
Animal behaviour in a human world: A crowdsourcing study on horses that open door and gate mechanisms
Anecdotal reports of horses opening fastened doors and gates are an intriguing way of exploring the possible scope of horses’ problem-solving capacities. The species’ natural environment has no analogues of the mechanisms involved. Scientific studies on the topic are missing, because the rate of occ...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6594629/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31242266 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218954 |
_version_ | 1783430268212740096 |
---|---|
author | Krueger, Konstanze Esch, Laureen Byrne, Richard |
author_facet | Krueger, Konstanze Esch, Laureen Byrne, Richard |
author_sort | Krueger, Konstanze |
collection | PubMed |
description | Anecdotal reports of horses opening fastened doors and gates are an intriguing way of exploring the possible scope of horses’ problem-solving capacities. The species’ natural environment has no analogues of the mechanisms involved. Scientific studies on the topic are missing, because the rate of occurrence is too low for exploration under controlled conditions. Therefore, we compiled from lay persons case reports of horses opening closed doors and gates. Additionally, we collected video documentations at the internet platform YouTube, taking care to select raw data footage of unedited, clearly described and clearly visible cases of animals with no distinct signs of training or reduced welfare. The data included individuals opening 513 doors or gates on hinges, 49 sliding doors, and 33 barred doors and gateways; mechanisms included 260 cases of horizontal and 155 vertical bars, 43 twist locks, 42 door handles, 34 electric fence handles, 40 carabiners, and 2 locks with keys. Opening was usually for escape, but also for access to food or stable-mates, or out of curiosity or playfulness. While 56 percent of the horses opened a single mechanism at one location, 44 percent opened several types of mechanism (median = 2, min. = 1, max. = 5) at different locations (median = 2, min. = 1, max. = 4). The more complex the mechanism was, the more movements were applied, varying from median 2 for door handles to 10 for carabiners. Mechanisms requiring head- or lip-twisting needed more movements, with significant variation between individuals. 74 horses reported in the questionnaire had options for observing the behaviour in stable mates, 183 did not, which indicates that the latter learned to open doors and gates either individually or from observing humans. Experience favours opening efficiency; subjects which opened several door types applied fewer movements per lock than horses which opened only one door type. We failed to identify a level of complexity of door-fastening mechanism that was beyond the learning capacity of the horse to open. Thus, all devices in frequent use, even carabiners and electric fence handles, are potentially vulnerable to opening by horses, something which needs to be considered in relation to keeping horses safely. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6594629 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65946292019-07-05 Animal behaviour in a human world: A crowdsourcing study on horses that open door and gate mechanisms Krueger, Konstanze Esch, Laureen Byrne, Richard PLoS One Research Article Anecdotal reports of horses opening fastened doors and gates are an intriguing way of exploring the possible scope of horses’ problem-solving capacities. The species’ natural environment has no analogues of the mechanisms involved. Scientific studies on the topic are missing, because the rate of occurrence is too low for exploration under controlled conditions. Therefore, we compiled from lay persons case reports of horses opening closed doors and gates. Additionally, we collected video documentations at the internet platform YouTube, taking care to select raw data footage of unedited, clearly described and clearly visible cases of animals with no distinct signs of training or reduced welfare. The data included individuals opening 513 doors or gates on hinges, 49 sliding doors, and 33 barred doors and gateways; mechanisms included 260 cases of horizontal and 155 vertical bars, 43 twist locks, 42 door handles, 34 electric fence handles, 40 carabiners, and 2 locks with keys. Opening was usually for escape, but also for access to food or stable-mates, or out of curiosity or playfulness. While 56 percent of the horses opened a single mechanism at one location, 44 percent opened several types of mechanism (median = 2, min. = 1, max. = 5) at different locations (median = 2, min. = 1, max. = 4). The more complex the mechanism was, the more movements were applied, varying from median 2 for door handles to 10 for carabiners. Mechanisms requiring head- or lip-twisting needed more movements, with significant variation between individuals. 74 horses reported in the questionnaire had options for observing the behaviour in stable mates, 183 did not, which indicates that the latter learned to open doors and gates either individually or from observing humans. Experience favours opening efficiency; subjects which opened several door types applied fewer movements per lock than horses which opened only one door type. We failed to identify a level of complexity of door-fastening mechanism that was beyond the learning capacity of the horse to open. Thus, all devices in frequent use, even carabiners and electric fence handles, are potentially vulnerable to opening by horses, something which needs to be considered in relation to keeping horses safely. Public Library of Science 2019-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6594629/ /pubmed/31242266 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218954 Text en © 2019 Krueger et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Krueger, Konstanze Esch, Laureen Byrne, Richard Animal behaviour in a human world: A crowdsourcing study on horses that open door and gate mechanisms |
title | Animal behaviour in a human world: A crowdsourcing study on horses that open door and gate mechanisms |
title_full | Animal behaviour in a human world: A crowdsourcing study on horses that open door and gate mechanisms |
title_fullStr | Animal behaviour in a human world: A crowdsourcing study on horses that open door and gate mechanisms |
title_full_unstemmed | Animal behaviour in a human world: A crowdsourcing study on horses that open door and gate mechanisms |
title_short | Animal behaviour in a human world: A crowdsourcing study on horses that open door and gate mechanisms |
title_sort | animal behaviour in a human world: a crowdsourcing study on horses that open door and gate mechanisms |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6594629/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31242266 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218954 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kruegerkonstanze animalbehaviourinahumanworldacrowdsourcingstudyonhorsesthatopendoorandgatemechanisms AT eschlaureen animalbehaviourinahumanworldacrowdsourcingstudyonhorsesthatopendoorandgatemechanisms AT byrnerichard animalbehaviourinahumanworldacrowdsourcingstudyonhorsesthatopendoorandgatemechanisms |