Cargando…

Animal behaviour in a human world: A crowdsourcing study on horses that open door and gate mechanisms

Anecdotal reports of horses opening fastened doors and gates are an intriguing way of exploring the possible scope of horses’ problem-solving capacities. The species’ natural environment has no analogues of the mechanisms involved. Scientific studies on the topic are missing, because the rate of occ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Krueger, Konstanze, Esch, Laureen, Byrne, Richard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6594629/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31242266
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218954
_version_ 1783430268212740096
author Krueger, Konstanze
Esch, Laureen
Byrne, Richard
author_facet Krueger, Konstanze
Esch, Laureen
Byrne, Richard
author_sort Krueger, Konstanze
collection PubMed
description Anecdotal reports of horses opening fastened doors and gates are an intriguing way of exploring the possible scope of horses’ problem-solving capacities. The species’ natural environment has no analogues of the mechanisms involved. Scientific studies on the topic are missing, because the rate of occurrence is too low for exploration under controlled conditions. Therefore, we compiled from lay persons case reports of horses opening closed doors and gates. Additionally, we collected video documentations at the internet platform YouTube, taking care to select raw data footage of unedited, clearly described and clearly visible cases of animals with no distinct signs of training or reduced welfare. The data included individuals opening 513 doors or gates on hinges, 49 sliding doors, and 33 barred doors and gateways; mechanisms included 260 cases of horizontal and 155 vertical bars, 43 twist locks, 42 door handles, 34 electric fence handles, 40 carabiners, and 2 locks with keys. Opening was usually for escape, but also for access to food or stable-mates, or out of curiosity or playfulness. While 56 percent of the horses opened a single mechanism at one location, 44 percent opened several types of mechanism (median = 2, min. = 1, max. = 5) at different locations (median = 2, min. = 1, max. = 4). The more complex the mechanism was, the more movements were applied, varying from median 2 for door handles to 10 for carabiners. Mechanisms requiring head- or lip-twisting needed more movements, with significant variation between individuals. 74 horses reported in the questionnaire had options for observing the behaviour in stable mates, 183 did not, which indicates that the latter learned to open doors and gates either individually or from observing humans. Experience favours opening efficiency; subjects which opened several door types applied fewer movements per lock than horses which opened only one door type. We failed to identify a level of complexity of door-fastening mechanism that was beyond the learning capacity of the horse to open. Thus, all devices in frequent use, even carabiners and electric fence handles, are potentially vulnerable to opening by horses, something which needs to be considered in relation to keeping horses safely.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6594629
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65946292019-07-05 Animal behaviour in a human world: A crowdsourcing study on horses that open door and gate mechanisms Krueger, Konstanze Esch, Laureen Byrne, Richard PLoS One Research Article Anecdotal reports of horses opening fastened doors and gates are an intriguing way of exploring the possible scope of horses’ problem-solving capacities. The species’ natural environment has no analogues of the mechanisms involved. Scientific studies on the topic are missing, because the rate of occurrence is too low for exploration under controlled conditions. Therefore, we compiled from lay persons case reports of horses opening closed doors and gates. Additionally, we collected video documentations at the internet platform YouTube, taking care to select raw data footage of unedited, clearly described and clearly visible cases of animals with no distinct signs of training or reduced welfare. The data included individuals opening 513 doors or gates on hinges, 49 sliding doors, and 33 barred doors and gateways; mechanisms included 260 cases of horizontal and 155 vertical bars, 43 twist locks, 42 door handles, 34 electric fence handles, 40 carabiners, and 2 locks with keys. Opening was usually for escape, but also for access to food or stable-mates, or out of curiosity or playfulness. While 56 percent of the horses opened a single mechanism at one location, 44 percent opened several types of mechanism (median = 2, min. = 1, max. = 5) at different locations (median = 2, min. = 1, max. = 4). The more complex the mechanism was, the more movements were applied, varying from median 2 for door handles to 10 for carabiners. Mechanisms requiring head- or lip-twisting needed more movements, with significant variation between individuals. 74 horses reported in the questionnaire had options for observing the behaviour in stable mates, 183 did not, which indicates that the latter learned to open doors and gates either individually or from observing humans. Experience favours opening efficiency; subjects which opened several door types applied fewer movements per lock than horses which opened only one door type. We failed to identify a level of complexity of door-fastening mechanism that was beyond the learning capacity of the horse to open. Thus, all devices in frequent use, even carabiners and electric fence handles, are potentially vulnerable to opening by horses, something which needs to be considered in relation to keeping horses safely. Public Library of Science 2019-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6594629/ /pubmed/31242266 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218954 Text en © 2019 Krueger et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Krueger, Konstanze
Esch, Laureen
Byrne, Richard
Animal behaviour in a human world: A crowdsourcing study on horses that open door and gate mechanisms
title Animal behaviour in a human world: A crowdsourcing study on horses that open door and gate mechanisms
title_full Animal behaviour in a human world: A crowdsourcing study on horses that open door and gate mechanisms
title_fullStr Animal behaviour in a human world: A crowdsourcing study on horses that open door and gate mechanisms
title_full_unstemmed Animal behaviour in a human world: A crowdsourcing study on horses that open door and gate mechanisms
title_short Animal behaviour in a human world: A crowdsourcing study on horses that open door and gate mechanisms
title_sort animal behaviour in a human world: a crowdsourcing study on horses that open door and gate mechanisms
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6594629/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31242266
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218954
work_keys_str_mv AT kruegerkonstanze animalbehaviourinahumanworldacrowdsourcingstudyonhorsesthatopendoorandgatemechanisms
AT eschlaureen animalbehaviourinahumanworldacrowdsourcingstudyonhorsesthatopendoorandgatemechanisms
AT byrnerichard animalbehaviourinahumanworldacrowdsourcingstudyonhorsesthatopendoorandgatemechanisms