Cargando…

Midterm Clinical Outcome of Combined Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Posterolateral Corner Surgery Using Second‐Look Arthroscopic “Lateral Gutter Drive‐Through” Test as an Adjunctive Evaluation

OBJECTIVES: The arthroscopic “lateral gutter drive‐through” (LGDT) sign is reported to diagnose popliteus tendon (PT) injury with high sensitivity and specificity. However, no study has provided a postoperative evaluation of combined posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) and posterolateral corner (PLC)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Yue, Hong, Lei, Wang, Xue‐song, Zhang, Hui, Li, Xu, Zheng, Tong, Feng, Hua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6595102/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31243923
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.12493
_version_ 1783430343596965888
author Li, Yue
Hong, Lei
Wang, Xue‐song
Zhang, Hui
Li, Xu
Zheng, Tong
Feng, Hua
author_facet Li, Yue
Hong, Lei
Wang, Xue‐song
Zhang, Hui
Li, Xu
Zheng, Tong
Feng, Hua
author_sort Li, Yue
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The arthroscopic “lateral gutter drive‐through” (LGDT) sign is reported to diagnose popliteus tendon (PT) injury with high sensitivity and specificity. However, no study has provided a postoperative evaluation of combined posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) and posterolateral corner (PLC) injuries using the LGDT test. METHODS: From January 2012 to January 2015, a total of 80 consecutive patients who underwent combined PCL reconstruction and PLC surgeries were identified. Fifty eligible patients were included in this study for evaluation with subjective scoring systems, physical examinations, posterior and varus stress radiographs, and second‐look arthroscopic surgeries during hardware removal operation. RESULTS: Forty‐nine patients were available for a mean of 31.5 ± 9.3 months follow‐up (range, 24.0–81.0 months). In terms of PLC injury pattern, there were 27 type A, 10 type B, and 12 type C patients, with 21 acute cases and 28 chronic cases. At the final follow‐up, subjective scores were all significantly improved. The side‐to‐side difference (SSD) of posterior tibial translation (PTT) improved from 18.4 ± 9.2 mm (range, 12.9–25.6 mm) to 5.2 ± 5.0 mm (range, −5.0−18.5 mm, P < 0.001), and the SSD of tibial external rotation by dial test (ER) decreased from 18.0° ± 14.4° (range, 13.0°–22.0°) to 1.2° ± 7.5° (range, −9.0°–22.0°, P < 0.001). In patients with type C injury, the SSD of the lateral opening decreased from 14.2 ± 6.6 mm (range, 22–10.2 mm) to 0.9 ± 3.1 mm (range, −4.4‐6 mm, P < 0.001). In a comparison between patients with positive and negative LGDT signs, the LGDT‐negative patients had significant superiority in subjective scores, SSD of PTT, and SSD of ER. The sensitivity and specificity of the LGDT test in detecting postoperative posterolateral rotational instability (PLRI) were calculated as 100% and 88.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In the series of surgically treated patients with PCL and PLC injury: (i) patients had improved subjective and objective clinical outcome after combined PCL reconstruction and PLC surgery at a minimum of 24‐months follow‐up; and (ii) second arthroscopic LGDT sign testing had high sensitivity and specificity in detecting postoperative PLRI, and a positive LGDT sign was related with inferior subjective and objective results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6595102
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65951022019-09-10 Midterm Clinical Outcome of Combined Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Posterolateral Corner Surgery Using Second‐Look Arthroscopic “Lateral Gutter Drive‐Through” Test as an Adjunctive Evaluation Li, Yue Hong, Lei Wang, Xue‐song Zhang, Hui Li, Xu Zheng, Tong Feng, Hua Orthop Surg Clinical Articles OBJECTIVES: The arthroscopic “lateral gutter drive‐through” (LGDT) sign is reported to diagnose popliteus tendon (PT) injury with high sensitivity and specificity. However, no study has provided a postoperative evaluation of combined posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) and posterolateral corner (PLC) injuries using the LGDT test. METHODS: From January 2012 to January 2015, a total of 80 consecutive patients who underwent combined PCL reconstruction and PLC surgeries were identified. Fifty eligible patients were included in this study for evaluation with subjective scoring systems, physical examinations, posterior and varus stress radiographs, and second‐look arthroscopic surgeries during hardware removal operation. RESULTS: Forty‐nine patients were available for a mean of 31.5 ± 9.3 months follow‐up (range, 24.0–81.0 months). In terms of PLC injury pattern, there were 27 type A, 10 type B, and 12 type C patients, with 21 acute cases and 28 chronic cases. At the final follow‐up, subjective scores were all significantly improved. The side‐to‐side difference (SSD) of posterior tibial translation (PTT) improved from 18.4 ± 9.2 mm (range, 12.9–25.6 mm) to 5.2 ± 5.0 mm (range, −5.0−18.5 mm, P < 0.001), and the SSD of tibial external rotation by dial test (ER) decreased from 18.0° ± 14.4° (range, 13.0°–22.0°) to 1.2° ± 7.5° (range, −9.0°–22.0°, P < 0.001). In patients with type C injury, the SSD of the lateral opening decreased from 14.2 ± 6.6 mm (range, 22–10.2 mm) to 0.9 ± 3.1 mm (range, −4.4‐6 mm, P < 0.001). In a comparison between patients with positive and negative LGDT signs, the LGDT‐negative patients had significant superiority in subjective scores, SSD of PTT, and SSD of ER. The sensitivity and specificity of the LGDT test in detecting postoperative posterolateral rotational instability (PLRI) were calculated as 100% and 88.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In the series of surgically treated patients with PCL and PLC injury: (i) patients had improved subjective and objective clinical outcome after combined PCL reconstruction and PLC surgery at a minimum of 24‐months follow‐up; and (ii) second arthroscopic LGDT sign testing had high sensitivity and specificity in detecting postoperative PLRI, and a positive LGDT sign was related with inferior subjective and objective results. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2019-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6595102/ /pubmed/31243923 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.12493 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Orthopaedic Surgery published by Chinese Orthopaedic Association and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Clinical Articles
Li, Yue
Hong, Lei
Wang, Xue‐song
Zhang, Hui
Li, Xu
Zheng, Tong
Feng, Hua
Midterm Clinical Outcome of Combined Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Posterolateral Corner Surgery Using Second‐Look Arthroscopic “Lateral Gutter Drive‐Through” Test as an Adjunctive Evaluation
title Midterm Clinical Outcome of Combined Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Posterolateral Corner Surgery Using Second‐Look Arthroscopic “Lateral Gutter Drive‐Through” Test as an Adjunctive Evaluation
title_full Midterm Clinical Outcome of Combined Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Posterolateral Corner Surgery Using Second‐Look Arthroscopic “Lateral Gutter Drive‐Through” Test as an Adjunctive Evaluation
title_fullStr Midterm Clinical Outcome of Combined Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Posterolateral Corner Surgery Using Second‐Look Arthroscopic “Lateral Gutter Drive‐Through” Test as an Adjunctive Evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Midterm Clinical Outcome of Combined Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Posterolateral Corner Surgery Using Second‐Look Arthroscopic “Lateral Gutter Drive‐Through” Test as an Adjunctive Evaluation
title_short Midterm Clinical Outcome of Combined Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Posterolateral Corner Surgery Using Second‐Look Arthroscopic “Lateral Gutter Drive‐Through” Test as an Adjunctive Evaluation
title_sort midterm clinical outcome of combined posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and posterolateral corner surgery using second‐look arthroscopic “lateral gutter drive‐through” test as an adjunctive evaluation
topic Clinical Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6595102/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31243923
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.12493
work_keys_str_mv AT liyue midtermclinicaloutcomeofcombinedposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionandposterolateralcornersurgeryusingsecondlookarthroscopiclateralgutterdrivethroughtestasanadjunctiveevaluation
AT honglei midtermclinicaloutcomeofcombinedposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionandposterolateralcornersurgeryusingsecondlookarthroscopiclateralgutterdrivethroughtestasanadjunctiveevaluation
AT wangxuesong midtermclinicaloutcomeofcombinedposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionandposterolateralcornersurgeryusingsecondlookarthroscopiclateralgutterdrivethroughtestasanadjunctiveevaluation
AT zhanghui midtermclinicaloutcomeofcombinedposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionandposterolateralcornersurgeryusingsecondlookarthroscopiclateralgutterdrivethroughtestasanadjunctiveevaluation
AT lixu midtermclinicaloutcomeofcombinedposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionandposterolateralcornersurgeryusingsecondlookarthroscopiclateralgutterdrivethroughtestasanadjunctiveevaluation
AT zhengtong midtermclinicaloutcomeofcombinedposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionandposterolateralcornersurgeryusingsecondlookarthroscopiclateralgutterdrivethroughtestasanadjunctiveevaluation
AT fenghua midtermclinicaloutcomeofcombinedposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionandposterolateralcornersurgeryusingsecondlookarthroscopiclateralgutterdrivethroughtestasanadjunctiveevaluation