Cargando…

Surgical Experience and Complications in 50 Patients Treated with an Anular Closure Device Following Lumbar Discectomy

OBJECTIVE: To examine the results of an anular closure device for prevention of lumbar disc reherniation in daily routine practice. METHODS: Fifty patients with large anular defects were treated with limited discectomy and a bone‐anchored anular closure device. The device physically occludes the def...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ardeshiri, Ardeshir, Miller, Larry E, Synowitz, Michael, Jadik, Senol
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6595107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31243920
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.12495
_version_ 1783430344750399488
author Ardeshiri, Ardeshir
Miller, Larry E
Synowitz, Michael
Jadik, Senol
author_facet Ardeshiri, Ardeshir
Miller, Larry E
Synowitz, Michael
Jadik, Senol
author_sort Ardeshiri, Ardeshir
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To examine the results of an anular closure device for prevention of lumbar disc reherniation in daily routine practice. METHODS: Fifty patients with large anular defects were treated with limited discectomy and a bone‐anchored anular closure device. The device physically occludes the defect in the anulus fibrosus and is intended for prevention of lumbar disc reherniation. Pain scores on a visual analogue scale, back function on the Oswestry Disability Index, and neurological status were noted. Symptomatic reherniation and reoperation rates were assessed at each follow‐up. Surgical findings and complications, device‐related and/or procedure‐related, were recorded. Follow‐up was 6, 12, 26, and 52 weeks. RESULTS: Mean anular defect height/width was 4.6 mm/10.1 mm. The overall symptomatic reherniation and reoperation rate was 2%. During the 1‐year follow‐up period, mean back pain decreased from 43 to 8 (P < 0.001), leg pain decreased from 71 to 4 (P < 0.001), and the Oswestry Disability Index decreased from 46 to 5 (P < 0.001). Among 15 patients with preoperative neurological deficits, improvements in neurological function were noted in 14 (93%). There were no serious device‐related complications. CONCLUSIONS: The presented study shows promising early results in using the anular closure device. The procedure is safe with significantly fewer reherniations than for patients with large anular defects without anular closure. Further studies with longer follow‐up periods are warranted to prove these findings for long‐term outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6595107
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65951072019-09-10 Surgical Experience and Complications in 50 Patients Treated with an Anular Closure Device Following Lumbar Discectomy Ardeshiri, Ardeshir Miller, Larry E Synowitz, Michael Jadik, Senol Orthop Surg Clinical Articles OBJECTIVE: To examine the results of an anular closure device for prevention of lumbar disc reherniation in daily routine practice. METHODS: Fifty patients with large anular defects were treated with limited discectomy and a bone‐anchored anular closure device. The device physically occludes the defect in the anulus fibrosus and is intended for prevention of lumbar disc reherniation. Pain scores on a visual analogue scale, back function on the Oswestry Disability Index, and neurological status were noted. Symptomatic reherniation and reoperation rates were assessed at each follow‐up. Surgical findings and complications, device‐related and/or procedure‐related, were recorded. Follow‐up was 6, 12, 26, and 52 weeks. RESULTS: Mean anular defect height/width was 4.6 mm/10.1 mm. The overall symptomatic reherniation and reoperation rate was 2%. During the 1‐year follow‐up period, mean back pain decreased from 43 to 8 (P < 0.001), leg pain decreased from 71 to 4 (P < 0.001), and the Oswestry Disability Index decreased from 46 to 5 (P < 0.001). Among 15 patients with preoperative neurological deficits, improvements in neurological function were noted in 14 (93%). There were no serious device‐related complications. CONCLUSIONS: The presented study shows promising early results in using the anular closure device. The procedure is safe with significantly fewer reherniations than for patients with large anular defects without anular closure. Further studies with longer follow‐up periods are warranted to prove these findings for long‐term outcomes. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2019-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6595107/ /pubmed/31243920 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.12495 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Orthopaedic Surgery published by Chinese Orthopaedic Association and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Articles
Ardeshiri, Ardeshir
Miller, Larry E
Synowitz, Michael
Jadik, Senol
Surgical Experience and Complications in 50 Patients Treated with an Anular Closure Device Following Lumbar Discectomy
title Surgical Experience and Complications in 50 Patients Treated with an Anular Closure Device Following Lumbar Discectomy
title_full Surgical Experience and Complications in 50 Patients Treated with an Anular Closure Device Following Lumbar Discectomy
title_fullStr Surgical Experience and Complications in 50 Patients Treated with an Anular Closure Device Following Lumbar Discectomy
title_full_unstemmed Surgical Experience and Complications in 50 Patients Treated with an Anular Closure Device Following Lumbar Discectomy
title_short Surgical Experience and Complications in 50 Patients Treated with an Anular Closure Device Following Lumbar Discectomy
title_sort surgical experience and complications in 50 patients treated with an anular closure device following lumbar discectomy
topic Clinical Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6595107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31243920
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.12495
work_keys_str_mv AT ardeshiriardeshir surgicalexperienceandcomplicationsin50patientstreatedwithananularclosuredevicefollowinglumbardiscectomy
AT millerlarrye surgicalexperienceandcomplicationsin50patientstreatedwithananularclosuredevicefollowinglumbardiscectomy
AT synowitzmichael surgicalexperienceandcomplicationsin50patientstreatedwithananularclosuredevicefollowinglumbardiscectomy
AT jadiksenol surgicalexperienceandcomplicationsin50patientstreatedwithananularclosuredevicefollowinglumbardiscectomy