Cargando…
Surgical Experience and Complications in 50 Patients Treated with an Anular Closure Device Following Lumbar Discectomy
OBJECTIVE: To examine the results of an anular closure device for prevention of lumbar disc reherniation in daily routine practice. METHODS: Fifty patients with large anular defects were treated with limited discectomy and a bone‐anchored anular closure device. The device physically occludes the def...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6595107/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31243920 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.12495 |
_version_ | 1783430344750399488 |
---|---|
author | Ardeshiri, Ardeshir Miller, Larry E Synowitz, Michael Jadik, Senol |
author_facet | Ardeshiri, Ardeshir Miller, Larry E Synowitz, Michael Jadik, Senol |
author_sort | Ardeshiri, Ardeshir |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To examine the results of an anular closure device for prevention of lumbar disc reherniation in daily routine practice. METHODS: Fifty patients with large anular defects were treated with limited discectomy and a bone‐anchored anular closure device. The device physically occludes the defect in the anulus fibrosus and is intended for prevention of lumbar disc reherniation. Pain scores on a visual analogue scale, back function on the Oswestry Disability Index, and neurological status were noted. Symptomatic reherniation and reoperation rates were assessed at each follow‐up. Surgical findings and complications, device‐related and/or procedure‐related, were recorded. Follow‐up was 6, 12, 26, and 52 weeks. RESULTS: Mean anular defect height/width was 4.6 mm/10.1 mm. The overall symptomatic reherniation and reoperation rate was 2%. During the 1‐year follow‐up period, mean back pain decreased from 43 to 8 (P < 0.001), leg pain decreased from 71 to 4 (P < 0.001), and the Oswestry Disability Index decreased from 46 to 5 (P < 0.001). Among 15 patients with preoperative neurological deficits, improvements in neurological function were noted in 14 (93%). There were no serious device‐related complications. CONCLUSIONS: The presented study shows promising early results in using the anular closure device. The procedure is safe with significantly fewer reherniations than for patients with large anular defects without anular closure. Further studies with longer follow‐up periods are warranted to prove these findings for long‐term outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6595107 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65951072019-09-10 Surgical Experience and Complications in 50 Patients Treated with an Anular Closure Device Following Lumbar Discectomy Ardeshiri, Ardeshir Miller, Larry E Synowitz, Michael Jadik, Senol Orthop Surg Clinical Articles OBJECTIVE: To examine the results of an anular closure device for prevention of lumbar disc reherniation in daily routine practice. METHODS: Fifty patients with large anular defects were treated with limited discectomy and a bone‐anchored anular closure device. The device physically occludes the defect in the anulus fibrosus and is intended for prevention of lumbar disc reherniation. Pain scores on a visual analogue scale, back function on the Oswestry Disability Index, and neurological status were noted. Symptomatic reherniation and reoperation rates were assessed at each follow‐up. Surgical findings and complications, device‐related and/or procedure‐related, were recorded. Follow‐up was 6, 12, 26, and 52 weeks. RESULTS: Mean anular defect height/width was 4.6 mm/10.1 mm. The overall symptomatic reherniation and reoperation rate was 2%. During the 1‐year follow‐up period, mean back pain decreased from 43 to 8 (P < 0.001), leg pain decreased from 71 to 4 (P < 0.001), and the Oswestry Disability Index decreased from 46 to 5 (P < 0.001). Among 15 patients with preoperative neurological deficits, improvements in neurological function were noted in 14 (93%). There were no serious device‐related complications. CONCLUSIONS: The presented study shows promising early results in using the anular closure device. The procedure is safe with significantly fewer reherniations than for patients with large anular defects without anular closure. Further studies with longer follow‐up periods are warranted to prove these findings for long‐term outcomes. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2019-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6595107/ /pubmed/31243920 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.12495 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Orthopaedic Surgery published by Chinese Orthopaedic Association and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Articles Ardeshiri, Ardeshir Miller, Larry E Synowitz, Michael Jadik, Senol Surgical Experience and Complications in 50 Patients Treated with an Anular Closure Device Following Lumbar Discectomy |
title | Surgical Experience and Complications in 50 Patients Treated with an Anular Closure Device Following Lumbar Discectomy |
title_full | Surgical Experience and Complications in 50 Patients Treated with an Anular Closure Device Following Lumbar Discectomy |
title_fullStr | Surgical Experience and Complications in 50 Patients Treated with an Anular Closure Device Following Lumbar Discectomy |
title_full_unstemmed | Surgical Experience and Complications in 50 Patients Treated with an Anular Closure Device Following Lumbar Discectomy |
title_short | Surgical Experience and Complications in 50 Patients Treated with an Anular Closure Device Following Lumbar Discectomy |
title_sort | surgical experience and complications in 50 patients treated with an anular closure device following lumbar discectomy |
topic | Clinical Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6595107/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31243920 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.12495 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ardeshiriardeshir surgicalexperienceandcomplicationsin50patientstreatedwithananularclosuredevicefollowinglumbardiscectomy AT millerlarrye surgicalexperienceandcomplicationsin50patientstreatedwithananularclosuredevicefollowinglumbardiscectomy AT synowitzmichael surgicalexperienceandcomplicationsin50patientstreatedwithananularclosuredevicefollowinglumbardiscectomy AT jadiksenol surgicalexperienceandcomplicationsin50patientstreatedwithananularclosuredevicefollowinglumbardiscectomy |