Cargando…

Single-port transperitoneal robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (spRALP): Initial experience

OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of single-port transperitoneal robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (spRALP) and discuss its surgical technique. METHODS: A 60-year-old male was admitted with an elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of 13.89 ng/mL and confirmed with prost...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chang, Yifan, Lu, Xiaojun, Zhu, Qingliang, Xu, Chuanliang, Sun, Yinghao, Ren, Shancheng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Second Military Medical University 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6595143/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31297322
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajur.2018.08.002
_version_ 1783430352928243712
author Chang, Yifan
Lu, Xiaojun
Zhu, Qingliang
Xu, Chuanliang
Sun, Yinghao
Ren, Shancheng
author_facet Chang, Yifan
Lu, Xiaojun
Zhu, Qingliang
Xu, Chuanliang
Sun, Yinghao
Ren, Shancheng
author_sort Chang, Yifan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of single-port transperitoneal robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (spRALP) and discuss its surgical technique. METHODS: A 60-year-old male was admitted with an elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of 13.89 ng/mL and confirmed with prostate cancer on biopsy showing three of 22 positive cores with a Gleason score of 3 + 4 = 7. Multiparametric magnetic resonance (MR) and bone scintigraphy showed organ-confined disease. spRALP was performed using da Vinci Si HD surgical system, with access of a quadri-channel laparoscopic port placed supraumbilically. Two drainage tubes were placed before wound closure. The surgical procedure was largely in consistence with a conventional robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. RESULTS: The surgery was successfully carried out with a duration of 152 min and an estimated blood loss of 100 mL. The patient was discharged on postoperative Day 4 after removal of both pelvic drainage tubes. Foley catheter was removed on postoperative Day 14. No major complications were encountered. Postoperative pathology showed a Gleason score of 3 + 4 = 7 with no extraprostatic extension and negative surgical margins. CONCLUSION: Single-port robotic prostatectomy is feasible using the currently available robotic instruments in most Chinese robotic urological centers. Meticulous preoperative planning and careful patient selection are mandatory. Further studies concerning perioperative complications and pentafecta outcome compared with the conventional multi-port robotic prostatectomy is required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6595143
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Second Military Medical University
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65951432019-07-11 Single-port transperitoneal robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (spRALP): Initial experience Chang, Yifan Lu, Xiaojun Zhu, Qingliang Xu, Chuanliang Sun, Yinghao Ren, Shancheng Asian J Urol Surgery Alive OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of single-port transperitoneal robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (spRALP) and discuss its surgical technique. METHODS: A 60-year-old male was admitted with an elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of 13.89 ng/mL and confirmed with prostate cancer on biopsy showing three of 22 positive cores with a Gleason score of 3 + 4 = 7. Multiparametric magnetic resonance (MR) and bone scintigraphy showed organ-confined disease. spRALP was performed using da Vinci Si HD surgical system, with access of a quadri-channel laparoscopic port placed supraumbilically. Two drainage tubes were placed before wound closure. The surgical procedure was largely in consistence with a conventional robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. RESULTS: The surgery was successfully carried out with a duration of 152 min and an estimated blood loss of 100 mL. The patient was discharged on postoperative Day 4 after removal of both pelvic drainage tubes. Foley catheter was removed on postoperative Day 14. No major complications were encountered. Postoperative pathology showed a Gleason score of 3 + 4 = 7 with no extraprostatic extension and negative surgical margins. CONCLUSION: Single-port robotic prostatectomy is feasible using the currently available robotic instruments in most Chinese robotic urological centers. Meticulous preoperative planning and careful patient selection are mandatory. Further studies concerning perioperative complications and pentafecta outcome compared with the conventional multi-port robotic prostatectomy is required. Second Military Medical University 2019-07 2018-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6595143/ /pubmed/31297322 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajur.2018.08.002 Text en © 2018 Editorial Office of Asian Journal of Urology. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Surgery Alive
Chang, Yifan
Lu, Xiaojun
Zhu, Qingliang
Xu, Chuanliang
Sun, Yinghao
Ren, Shancheng
Single-port transperitoneal robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (spRALP): Initial experience
title Single-port transperitoneal robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (spRALP): Initial experience
title_full Single-port transperitoneal robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (spRALP): Initial experience
title_fullStr Single-port transperitoneal robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (spRALP): Initial experience
title_full_unstemmed Single-port transperitoneal robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (spRALP): Initial experience
title_short Single-port transperitoneal robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (spRALP): Initial experience
title_sort single-port transperitoneal robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (spralp): initial experience
topic Surgery Alive
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6595143/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31297322
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajur.2018.08.002
work_keys_str_mv AT changyifan singleporttransperitonealroboticassistedlaparoscopicradicalprostatectomyspralpinitialexperience
AT luxiaojun singleporttransperitonealroboticassistedlaparoscopicradicalprostatectomyspralpinitialexperience
AT zhuqingliang singleporttransperitonealroboticassistedlaparoscopicradicalprostatectomyspralpinitialexperience
AT xuchuanliang singleporttransperitonealroboticassistedlaparoscopicradicalprostatectomyspralpinitialexperience
AT sunyinghao singleporttransperitonealroboticassistedlaparoscopicradicalprostatectomyspralpinitialexperience
AT renshancheng singleporttransperitonealroboticassistedlaparoscopicradicalprostatectomyspralpinitialexperience