Cargando…
Sex differences in adverse drug reactions reported to the National Pharmacovigilance Centre in the Netherlands: An explorative observational study
AIMS: We aimed to assess and characterize sex differences in adverse drug reactions (ADRs) reported to the national pharmacovigilance centre in the Netherlands while considering differences in drug use. METHODS: ADRs spontaneously reported by healthcare professionals and patients to the Netherlands...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6595313/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30941789 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bcp.13923 |
_version_ | 1783430378809196544 |
---|---|
author | de Vries, Sieta T. Denig, Petra Ekhart, Corine Burgers, Jako S. Kleefstra, Nanno Mol, Peter G.M. van Puijenbroek, Eugène P. |
author_facet | de Vries, Sieta T. Denig, Petra Ekhart, Corine Burgers, Jako S. Kleefstra, Nanno Mol, Peter G.M. van Puijenbroek, Eugène P. |
author_sort | de Vries, Sieta T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: We aimed to assess and characterize sex differences in adverse drug reactions (ADRs) reported to the national pharmacovigilance centre in the Netherlands while considering differences in drug use. METHODS: ADRs spontaneously reported by healthcare professionals and patients to the Netherlands pharmacovigilance centre Lareb were used. Drug–ADR combinations reported at least 10 times between 2003–2016 for drugs used by ≥10,000 persons in that period were included. Data about the number of drug users was obtained from the National Health Care Institute. Sex‐specific ADRs, like gynaecological problems, were excluded. Sex differences in specific drug–ADR combinations were tested using bivariate logistic regression analyses in which the number of drug users per sex was taken into account. RESULTS: In total, 2483 drug–ADR combinations were analysed. Possibly relevant sex differences were shown in 363 combinations (15%). Most of these drug–ADR combinations were reported more often for women (322 combinations). Drugs with the highest number of ADRs that were more often reported for women included thyroid hormones (32 combinations) and antidepressants (16 combinations for the centrally acting sympathomimetics; 14 combinations for other antidepressants). Some ADRs were predominantly reported for women across a range of drugs such as headache and dizziness whereas other ADRs such as tendon ruptures and aggression were reported more often for men. CONCLUSIONS: Identified sex differences in reported ADRs often referred to women. These differences may have various causes, including pharmacological and behavioural causes, which need to be further assessed. The results may ultimately lead to sex‐specific prescribing or monitoring recommendations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6595313 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65953132019-07-11 Sex differences in adverse drug reactions reported to the National Pharmacovigilance Centre in the Netherlands: An explorative observational study de Vries, Sieta T. Denig, Petra Ekhart, Corine Burgers, Jako S. Kleefstra, Nanno Mol, Peter G.M. van Puijenbroek, Eugène P. Br J Clin Pharmacol Original Articles AIMS: We aimed to assess and characterize sex differences in adverse drug reactions (ADRs) reported to the national pharmacovigilance centre in the Netherlands while considering differences in drug use. METHODS: ADRs spontaneously reported by healthcare professionals and patients to the Netherlands pharmacovigilance centre Lareb were used. Drug–ADR combinations reported at least 10 times between 2003–2016 for drugs used by ≥10,000 persons in that period were included. Data about the number of drug users was obtained from the National Health Care Institute. Sex‐specific ADRs, like gynaecological problems, were excluded. Sex differences in specific drug–ADR combinations were tested using bivariate logistic regression analyses in which the number of drug users per sex was taken into account. RESULTS: In total, 2483 drug–ADR combinations were analysed. Possibly relevant sex differences were shown in 363 combinations (15%). Most of these drug–ADR combinations were reported more often for women (322 combinations). Drugs with the highest number of ADRs that were more often reported for women included thyroid hormones (32 combinations) and antidepressants (16 combinations for the centrally acting sympathomimetics; 14 combinations for other antidepressants). Some ADRs were predominantly reported for women across a range of drugs such as headache and dizziness whereas other ADRs such as tendon ruptures and aggression were reported more often for men. CONCLUSIONS: Identified sex differences in reported ADRs often referred to women. These differences may have various causes, including pharmacological and behavioural causes, which need to be further assessed. The results may ultimately lead to sex‐specific prescribing or monitoring recommendations. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-04-29 2019-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6595313/ /pubmed/30941789 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bcp.13923 Text en © 2019 The Authors. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Pharmacological Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles de Vries, Sieta T. Denig, Petra Ekhart, Corine Burgers, Jako S. Kleefstra, Nanno Mol, Peter G.M. van Puijenbroek, Eugène P. Sex differences in adverse drug reactions reported to the National Pharmacovigilance Centre in the Netherlands: An explorative observational study |
title | Sex differences in adverse drug reactions reported to the National Pharmacovigilance Centre in the Netherlands: An explorative observational study |
title_full | Sex differences in adverse drug reactions reported to the National Pharmacovigilance Centre in the Netherlands: An explorative observational study |
title_fullStr | Sex differences in adverse drug reactions reported to the National Pharmacovigilance Centre in the Netherlands: An explorative observational study |
title_full_unstemmed | Sex differences in adverse drug reactions reported to the National Pharmacovigilance Centre in the Netherlands: An explorative observational study |
title_short | Sex differences in adverse drug reactions reported to the National Pharmacovigilance Centre in the Netherlands: An explorative observational study |
title_sort | sex differences in adverse drug reactions reported to the national pharmacovigilance centre in the netherlands: an explorative observational study |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6595313/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30941789 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bcp.13923 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT devriessietat sexdifferencesinadversedrugreactionsreportedtothenationalpharmacovigilancecentreinthenetherlandsanexplorativeobservationalstudy AT denigpetra sexdifferencesinadversedrugreactionsreportedtothenationalpharmacovigilancecentreinthenetherlandsanexplorativeobservationalstudy AT ekhartcorine sexdifferencesinadversedrugreactionsreportedtothenationalpharmacovigilancecentreinthenetherlandsanexplorativeobservationalstudy AT burgersjakos sexdifferencesinadversedrugreactionsreportedtothenationalpharmacovigilancecentreinthenetherlandsanexplorativeobservationalstudy AT kleefstrananno sexdifferencesinadversedrugreactionsreportedtothenationalpharmacovigilancecentreinthenetherlandsanexplorativeobservationalstudy AT molpetergm sexdifferencesinadversedrugreactionsreportedtothenationalpharmacovigilancecentreinthenetherlandsanexplorativeobservationalstudy AT vanpuijenbroekeugenep sexdifferencesinadversedrugreactionsreportedtothenationalpharmacovigilancecentreinthenetherlandsanexplorativeobservationalstudy |