Cargando…

Comparing the catheter delivery system and the stylet delivery system for ventricular lead placement in pacemaker implantation—The CATS delivery system randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Right ventricular lead placement is one of the fundamental procedures during pacemaker implantation through the subclavian vein. Currently, there are two techniques to deliver the lead to the right ventricle: the catheter and stylet delivery systems. Surgeons, especially trainees in the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yamagata, Kenichiro, Ishibashi, Kohei, Nakajima, Kenzaburo, Kataoka, Naoya, Kamakura, Tsukasa, Wada, Mitsuru, Inoue, Yuko, Miyamoto, Koji, Nagase, Satoshi, Noda, Takashi, Aiba, Takeshi, Yasuda, Satoshi, Kusano, Kengo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6595325/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31293703
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12179
_version_ 1783430381359333376
author Yamagata, Kenichiro
Ishibashi, Kohei
Nakajima, Kenzaburo
Kataoka, Naoya
Kamakura, Tsukasa
Wada, Mitsuru
Inoue, Yuko
Miyamoto, Koji
Nagase, Satoshi
Noda, Takashi
Aiba, Takeshi
Yasuda, Satoshi
Kusano, Kengo
author_facet Yamagata, Kenichiro
Ishibashi, Kohei
Nakajima, Kenzaburo
Kataoka, Naoya
Kamakura, Tsukasa
Wada, Mitsuru
Inoue, Yuko
Miyamoto, Koji
Nagase, Satoshi
Noda, Takashi
Aiba, Takeshi
Yasuda, Satoshi
Kusano, Kengo
author_sort Yamagata, Kenichiro
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Right ventricular lead placement is one of the fundamental procedures during pacemaker implantation through the subclavian vein. Currently, there are two techniques to deliver the lead to the right ventricle: the catheter and stylet delivery systems. Surgeons, especially trainees in the early stage of training, are known to face difficulty while delivering the lead to the right ventricle. The objective of this study is to investigate and compare the two techniques of lead delivery by trainees in patients who are scheduled to undergo pacemaker implantation. METHODS: This is a prospective, single‐center, randomized controlled clinical trial. One‐hundred patients who were scheduled to undergo pacemaker implantation with a right ventricular lead will be randomized such that the pacemaker can be implanted via either the catheter delivery system or the stylet delivery system at a 1:1 ratio. The primary endpoint is the total number of attempts needed to place the lead in the ideal position. Secondary endpoints are the efficacy and safety of the implantation procedure. All implantation procedures will be performed by trainees under the supervision of expert cardiologists. RESULTS: The results of this study are currently under investigation. CONCLUSION: This will be the first clinical trial to compare the efficacy and safety of the catheter delivery system and the stylet delivery system during the implantation of the ventricular lead in pacemaker implantation. Our findings are expected to improve the lead implantation procedure by providing information about which delivery system to choose in which situation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6595325
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65953252019-07-10 Comparing the catheter delivery system and the stylet delivery system for ventricular lead placement in pacemaker implantation—The CATS delivery system randomized controlled trial Yamagata, Kenichiro Ishibashi, Kohei Nakajima, Kenzaburo Kataoka, Naoya Kamakura, Tsukasa Wada, Mitsuru Inoue, Yuko Miyamoto, Koji Nagase, Satoshi Noda, Takashi Aiba, Takeshi Yasuda, Satoshi Kusano, Kengo J Arrhythm Original Articles BACKGROUND: Right ventricular lead placement is one of the fundamental procedures during pacemaker implantation through the subclavian vein. Currently, there are two techniques to deliver the lead to the right ventricle: the catheter and stylet delivery systems. Surgeons, especially trainees in the early stage of training, are known to face difficulty while delivering the lead to the right ventricle. The objective of this study is to investigate and compare the two techniques of lead delivery by trainees in patients who are scheduled to undergo pacemaker implantation. METHODS: This is a prospective, single‐center, randomized controlled clinical trial. One‐hundred patients who were scheduled to undergo pacemaker implantation with a right ventricular lead will be randomized such that the pacemaker can be implanted via either the catheter delivery system or the stylet delivery system at a 1:1 ratio. The primary endpoint is the total number of attempts needed to place the lead in the ideal position. Secondary endpoints are the efficacy and safety of the implantation procedure. All implantation procedures will be performed by trainees under the supervision of expert cardiologists. RESULTS: The results of this study are currently under investigation. CONCLUSION: This will be the first clinical trial to compare the efficacy and safety of the catheter delivery system and the stylet delivery system during the implantation of the ventricular lead in pacemaker implantation. Our findings are expected to improve the lead implantation procedure by providing information about which delivery system to choose in which situation. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6595325/ /pubmed/31293703 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12179 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Arrhythmia published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of the Japanese Heart Rhythm Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Yamagata, Kenichiro
Ishibashi, Kohei
Nakajima, Kenzaburo
Kataoka, Naoya
Kamakura, Tsukasa
Wada, Mitsuru
Inoue, Yuko
Miyamoto, Koji
Nagase, Satoshi
Noda, Takashi
Aiba, Takeshi
Yasuda, Satoshi
Kusano, Kengo
Comparing the catheter delivery system and the stylet delivery system for ventricular lead placement in pacemaker implantation—The CATS delivery system randomized controlled trial
title Comparing the catheter delivery system and the stylet delivery system for ventricular lead placement in pacemaker implantation—The CATS delivery system randomized controlled trial
title_full Comparing the catheter delivery system and the stylet delivery system for ventricular lead placement in pacemaker implantation—The CATS delivery system randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Comparing the catheter delivery system and the stylet delivery system for ventricular lead placement in pacemaker implantation—The CATS delivery system randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the catheter delivery system and the stylet delivery system for ventricular lead placement in pacemaker implantation—The CATS delivery system randomized controlled trial
title_short Comparing the catheter delivery system and the stylet delivery system for ventricular lead placement in pacemaker implantation—The CATS delivery system randomized controlled trial
title_sort comparing the catheter delivery system and the stylet delivery system for ventricular lead placement in pacemaker implantation—the cats delivery system randomized controlled trial
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6595325/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31293703
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12179
work_keys_str_mv AT yamagatakenichiro comparingthecatheterdeliverysystemandthestyletdeliverysystemforventricularleadplacementinpacemakerimplantationthecatsdeliverysystemrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ishibashikohei comparingthecatheterdeliverysystemandthestyletdeliverysystemforventricularleadplacementinpacemakerimplantationthecatsdeliverysystemrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT nakajimakenzaburo comparingthecatheterdeliverysystemandthestyletdeliverysystemforventricularleadplacementinpacemakerimplantationthecatsdeliverysystemrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kataokanaoya comparingthecatheterdeliverysystemandthestyletdeliverysystemforventricularleadplacementinpacemakerimplantationthecatsdeliverysystemrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kamakuratsukasa comparingthecatheterdeliverysystemandthestyletdeliverysystemforventricularleadplacementinpacemakerimplantationthecatsdeliverysystemrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wadamitsuru comparingthecatheterdeliverysystemandthestyletdeliverysystemforventricularleadplacementinpacemakerimplantationthecatsdeliverysystemrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT inoueyuko comparingthecatheterdeliverysystemandthestyletdeliverysystemforventricularleadplacementinpacemakerimplantationthecatsdeliverysystemrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT miyamotokoji comparingthecatheterdeliverysystemandthestyletdeliverysystemforventricularleadplacementinpacemakerimplantationthecatsdeliverysystemrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT nagasesatoshi comparingthecatheterdeliverysystemandthestyletdeliverysystemforventricularleadplacementinpacemakerimplantationthecatsdeliverysystemrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT nodatakashi comparingthecatheterdeliverysystemandthestyletdeliverysystemforventricularleadplacementinpacemakerimplantationthecatsdeliverysystemrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT aibatakeshi comparingthecatheterdeliverysystemandthestyletdeliverysystemforventricularleadplacementinpacemakerimplantationthecatsdeliverysystemrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT yasudasatoshi comparingthecatheterdeliverysystemandthestyletdeliverysystemforventricularleadplacementinpacemakerimplantationthecatsdeliverysystemrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kusanokengo comparingthecatheterdeliverysystemandthestyletdeliverysystemforventricularleadplacementinpacemakerimplantationthecatsdeliverysystemrandomizedcontrolledtrial