Cargando…
Comparing the catheter delivery system and the stylet delivery system for ventricular lead placement in pacemaker implantation—The CATS delivery system randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Right ventricular lead placement is one of the fundamental procedures during pacemaker implantation through the subclavian vein. Currently, there are two techniques to deliver the lead to the right ventricle: the catheter and stylet delivery systems. Surgeons, especially trainees in the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6595325/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31293703 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12179 |
_version_ | 1783430381359333376 |
---|---|
author | Yamagata, Kenichiro Ishibashi, Kohei Nakajima, Kenzaburo Kataoka, Naoya Kamakura, Tsukasa Wada, Mitsuru Inoue, Yuko Miyamoto, Koji Nagase, Satoshi Noda, Takashi Aiba, Takeshi Yasuda, Satoshi Kusano, Kengo |
author_facet | Yamagata, Kenichiro Ishibashi, Kohei Nakajima, Kenzaburo Kataoka, Naoya Kamakura, Tsukasa Wada, Mitsuru Inoue, Yuko Miyamoto, Koji Nagase, Satoshi Noda, Takashi Aiba, Takeshi Yasuda, Satoshi Kusano, Kengo |
author_sort | Yamagata, Kenichiro |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Right ventricular lead placement is one of the fundamental procedures during pacemaker implantation through the subclavian vein. Currently, there are two techniques to deliver the lead to the right ventricle: the catheter and stylet delivery systems. Surgeons, especially trainees in the early stage of training, are known to face difficulty while delivering the lead to the right ventricle. The objective of this study is to investigate and compare the two techniques of lead delivery by trainees in patients who are scheduled to undergo pacemaker implantation. METHODS: This is a prospective, single‐center, randomized controlled clinical trial. One‐hundred patients who were scheduled to undergo pacemaker implantation with a right ventricular lead will be randomized such that the pacemaker can be implanted via either the catheter delivery system or the stylet delivery system at a 1:1 ratio. The primary endpoint is the total number of attempts needed to place the lead in the ideal position. Secondary endpoints are the efficacy and safety of the implantation procedure. All implantation procedures will be performed by trainees under the supervision of expert cardiologists. RESULTS: The results of this study are currently under investigation. CONCLUSION: This will be the first clinical trial to compare the efficacy and safety of the catheter delivery system and the stylet delivery system during the implantation of the ventricular lead in pacemaker implantation. Our findings are expected to improve the lead implantation procedure by providing information about which delivery system to choose in which situation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6595325 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65953252019-07-10 Comparing the catheter delivery system and the stylet delivery system for ventricular lead placement in pacemaker implantation—The CATS delivery system randomized controlled trial Yamagata, Kenichiro Ishibashi, Kohei Nakajima, Kenzaburo Kataoka, Naoya Kamakura, Tsukasa Wada, Mitsuru Inoue, Yuko Miyamoto, Koji Nagase, Satoshi Noda, Takashi Aiba, Takeshi Yasuda, Satoshi Kusano, Kengo J Arrhythm Original Articles BACKGROUND: Right ventricular lead placement is one of the fundamental procedures during pacemaker implantation through the subclavian vein. Currently, there are two techniques to deliver the lead to the right ventricle: the catheter and stylet delivery systems. Surgeons, especially trainees in the early stage of training, are known to face difficulty while delivering the lead to the right ventricle. The objective of this study is to investigate and compare the two techniques of lead delivery by trainees in patients who are scheduled to undergo pacemaker implantation. METHODS: This is a prospective, single‐center, randomized controlled clinical trial. One‐hundred patients who were scheduled to undergo pacemaker implantation with a right ventricular lead will be randomized such that the pacemaker can be implanted via either the catheter delivery system or the stylet delivery system at a 1:1 ratio. The primary endpoint is the total number of attempts needed to place the lead in the ideal position. Secondary endpoints are the efficacy and safety of the implantation procedure. All implantation procedures will be performed by trainees under the supervision of expert cardiologists. RESULTS: The results of this study are currently under investigation. CONCLUSION: This will be the first clinical trial to compare the efficacy and safety of the catheter delivery system and the stylet delivery system during the implantation of the ventricular lead in pacemaker implantation. Our findings are expected to improve the lead implantation procedure by providing information about which delivery system to choose in which situation. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6595325/ /pubmed/31293703 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12179 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Arrhythmia published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of the Japanese Heart Rhythm Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Yamagata, Kenichiro Ishibashi, Kohei Nakajima, Kenzaburo Kataoka, Naoya Kamakura, Tsukasa Wada, Mitsuru Inoue, Yuko Miyamoto, Koji Nagase, Satoshi Noda, Takashi Aiba, Takeshi Yasuda, Satoshi Kusano, Kengo Comparing the catheter delivery system and the stylet delivery system for ventricular lead placement in pacemaker implantation—The CATS delivery system randomized controlled trial |
title | Comparing the catheter delivery system and the stylet delivery system for ventricular lead placement in pacemaker implantation—The CATS delivery system randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Comparing the catheter delivery system and the stylet delivery system for ventricular lead placement in pacemaker implantation—The CATS delivery system randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Comparing the catheter delivery system and the stylet delivery system for ventricular lead placement in pacemaker implantation—The CATS delivery system randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing the catheter delivery system and the stylet delivery system for ventricular lead placement in pacemaker implantation—The CATS delivery system randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Comparing the catheter delivery system and the stylet delivery system for ventricular lead placement in pacemaker implantation—The CATS delivery system randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | comparing the catheter delivery system and the stylet delivery system for ventricular lead placement in pacemaker implantation—the cats delivery system randomized controlled trial |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6595325/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31293703 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12179 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yamagatakenichiro comparingthecatheterdeliverysystemandthestyletdeliverysystemforventricularleadplacementinpacemakerimplantationthecatsdeliverysystemrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT ishibashikohei comparingthecatheterdeliverysystemandthestyletdeliverysystemforventricularleadplacementinpacemakerimplantationthecatsdeliverysystemrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT nakajimakenzaburo comparingthecatheterdeliverysystemandthestyletdeliverysystemforventricularleadplacementinpacemakerimplantationthecatsdeliverysystemrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kataokanaoya comparingthecatheterdeliverysystemandthestyletdeliverysystemforventricularleadplacementinpacemakerimplantationthecatsdeliverysystemrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kamakuratsukasa comparingthecatheterdeliverysystemandthestyletdeliverysystemforventricularleadplacementinpacemakerimplantationthecatsdeliverysystemrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT wadamitsuru comparingthecatheterdeliverysystemandthestyletdeliverysystemforventricularleadplacementinpacemakerimplantationthecatsdeliverysystemrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT inoueyuko comparingthecatheterdeliverysystemandthestyletdeliverysystemforventricularleadplacementinpacemakerimplantationthecatsdeliverysystemrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT miyamotokoji comparingthecatheterdeliverysystemandthestyletdeliverysystemforventricularleadplacementinpacemakerimplantationthecatsdeliverysystemrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT nagasesatoshi comparingthecatheterdeliverysystemandthestyletdeliverysystemforventricularleadplacementinpacemakerimplantationthecatsdeliverysystemrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT nodatakashi comparingthecatheterdeliverysystemandthestyletdeliverysystemforventricularleadplacementinpacemakerimplantationthecatsdeliverysystemrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT aibatakeshi comparingthecatheterdeliverysystemandthestyletdeliverysystemforventricularleadplacementinpacemakerimplantationthecatsdeliverysystemrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT yasudasatoshi comparingthecatheterdeliverysystemandthestyletdeliverysystemforventricularleadplacementinpacemakerimplantationthecatsdeliverysystemrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kusanokengo comparingthecatheterdeliverysystemandthestyletdeliverysystemforventricularleadplacementinpacemakerimplantationthecatsdeliverysystemrandomizedcontrolledtrial |