Cargando…

Clinicopathological Characteristics and Prognosis of Proximal and Distal Gastric Cancer during 1997–2017 in China National Cancer Center

BACKGROUND: The prognostic relevance of gastric tumor location has been reported and debated. Our study was conducted to examine the differences in clinicopathological features, prognostic factors, and overall survival (OS) between patients with proximal gastric cancer (PGC) and distal gastric cance...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhao, Lulu, Huang, Huang, Zhao, Dongbin, Wang, Chengfeng, Tian, Yantao, Yuan, Xinghua, Ma, Fuhai, Ren, Hu, Zhao, Yajie, Aimaiti, Saderbiek, Zhang, Shuisheng, Zhou, Hong, Wang, Tongbo, Wang, Nianchang, Sun, Yuemin, Bai, Xiaofeng, Chen, Yingtai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6595386/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31312217
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/9784039
_version_ 1783430391646912512
author Zhao, Lulu
Huang, Huang
Zhao, Dongbin
Wang, Chengfeng
Tian, Yantao
Yuan, Xinghua
Ma, Fuhai
Ren, Hu
Zhao, Yajie
Aimaiti, Saderbiek
Zhang, Shuisheng
Zhou, Hong
Wang, Tongbo
Wang, Nianchang
Sun, Yuemin
Bai, Xiaofeng
Chen, Yingtai
author_facet Zhao, Lulu
Huang, Huang
Zhao, Dongbin
Wang, Chengfeng
Tian, Yantao
Yuan, Xinghua
Ma, Fuhai
Ren, Hu
Zhao, Yajie
Aimaiti, Saderbiek
Zhang, Shuisheng
Zhou, Hong
Wang, Tongbo
Wang, Nianchang
Sun, Yuemin
Bai, Xiaofeng
Chen, Yingtai
author_sort Zhao, Lulu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The prognostic relevance of gastric tumor location has been reported and debated. Our study was conducted to examine the differences in clinicopathological features, prognostic factors, and overall survival (OS) between patients with proximal gastric cancer (PGC) and distal gastric cancer (DGC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with PGC or DGC were identified from the China National Cancer Center Gastric Cancer Database (NCCGCDB) during 1997–2017. Survival analysis was performed via Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: We reviewed 16,119 cases of gastric cancer patients, including 6,479 of PGC and 9,640 of DGC. PGC patients presented as older patients (61.5 versus 56.4 years, P<0.001) and more males (82.9% versus 68.2%, P<0.001). Compared with DGC, PGC was more likely to be in later pT stage (pT3 and pT4, 65.0% versus 52.8%, P<0.001) and lymph node metastasis (54.8% versus 50.9%, P<0.001). In univariate analysis, PGC patients had a worse survival outcome in stage I (Hazard ratio [HR] = 2.04, 95% CI: 1.42-2.94) but a better prognosis in stage IV (HR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.73-0.98) when compared to DGC patients. However, multivariate analysis demonstrated that PGC was not an independent predictor for poor survival (HR = 1.07, 95% CI: 1.00-1.14). Results from multivariate analysis also revealed that pT4, lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis, no gastrectomy, and Borrmann IV were independent predictors associated with poor survival for both PGC and DGC patients. Additional prognostic factors for PGC patients included underweight (BMI < 18.5) (HR = 1.29, 95% CI: 1.06-1.58), linitis plastica (HR = 2.13, 95% CI: 1.25-3.65), and overweight (23 ≤ BMI <27.5) (HR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.71-0.90). During the 20-year study period, the 5-year OS increased significantly for both PGC and DGC, with the increase rate of 91.7% and 67.7%, respectively. CONCLUSION: In China, PGC significantly differed from DGC in clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors. However, there was no significant relationship between survival outcome and gastric tumor location.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6595386
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65953862019-07-16 Clinicopathological Characteristics and Prognosis of Proximal and Distal Gastric Cancer during 1997–2017 in China National Cancer Center Zhao, Lulu Huang, Huang Zhao, Dongbin Wang, Chengfeng Tian, Yantao Yuan, Xinghua Ma, Fuhai Ren, Hu Zhao, Yajie Aimaiti, Saderbiek Zhang, Shuisheng Zhou, Hong Wang, Tongbo Wang, Nianchang Sun, Yuemin Bai, Xiaofeng Chen, Yingtai J Oncol Research Article BACKGROUND: The prognostic relevance of gastric tumor location has been reported and debated. Our study was conducted to examine the differences in clinicopathological features, prognostic factors, and overall survival (OS) between patients with proximal gastric cancer (PGC) and distal gastric cancer (DGC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with PGC or DGC were identified from the China National Cancer Center Gastric Cancer Database (NCCGCDB) during 1997–2017. Survival analysis was performed via Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: We reviewed 16,119 cases of gastric cancer patients, including 6,479 of PGC and 9,640 of DGC. PGC patients presented as older patients (61.5 versus 56.4 years, P<0.001) and more males (82.9% versus 68.2%, P<0.001). Compared with DGC, PGC was more likely to be in later pT stage (pT3 and pT4, 65.0% versus 52.8%, P<0.001) and lymph node metastasis (54.8% versus 50.9%, P<0.001). In univariate analysis, PGC patients had a worse survival outcome in stage I (Hazard ratio [HR] = 2.04, 95% CI: 1.42-2.94) but a better prognosis in stage IV (HR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.73-0.98) when compared to DGC patients. However, multivariate analysis demonstrated that PGC was not an independent predictor for poor survival (HR = 1.07, 95% CI: 1.00-1.14). Results from multivariate analysis also revealed that pT4, lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis, no gastrectomy, and Borrmann IV were independent predictors associated with poor survival for both PGC and DGC patients. Additional prognostic factors for PGC patients included underweight (BMI < 18.5) (HR = 1.29, 95% CI: 1.06-1.58), linitis plastica (HR = 2.13, 95% CI: 1.25-3.65), and overweight (23 ≤ BMI <27.5) (HR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.71-0.90). During the 20-year study period, the 5-year OS increased significantly for both PGC and DGC, with the increase rate of 91.7% and 67.7%, respectively. CONCLUSION: In China, PGC significantly differed from DGC in clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors. However, there was no significant relationship between survival outcome and gastric tumor location. Hindawi 2019-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6595386/ /pubmed/31312217 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/9784039 Text en Copyright © 2019 Lulu Zhao et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhao, Lulu
Huang, Huang
Zhao, Dongbin
Wang, Chengfeng
Tian, Yantao
Yuan, Xinghua
Ma, Fuhai
Ren, Hu
Zhao, Yajie
Aimaiti, Saderbiek
Zhang, Shuisheng
Zhou, Hong
Wang, Tongbo
Wang, Nianchang
Sun, Yuemin
Bai, Xiaofeng
Chen, Yingtai
Clinicopathological Characteristics and Prognosis of Proximal and Distal Gastric Cancer during 1997–2017 in China National Cancer Center
title Clinicopathological Characteristics and Prognosis of Proximal and Distal Gastric Cancer during 1997–2017 in China National Cancer Center
title_full Clinicopathological Characteristics and Prognosis of Proximal and Distal Gastric Cancer during 1997–2017 in China National Cancer Center
title_fullStr Clinicopathological Characteristics and Prognosis of Proximal and Distal Gastric Cancer during 1997–2017 in China National Cancer Center
title_full_unstemmed Clinicopathological Characteristics and Prognosis of Proximal and Distal Gastric Cancer during 1997–2017 in China National Cancer Center
title_short Clinicopathological Characteristics and Prognosis of Proximal and Distal Gastric Cancer during 1997–2017 in China National Cancer Center
title_sort clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of proximal and distal gastric cancer during 1997–2017 in china national cancer center
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6595386/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31312217
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/9784039
work_keys_str_mv AT zhaolulu clinicopathologicalcharacteristicsandprognosisofproximalanddistalgastriccancerduring19972017inchinanationalcancercenter
AT huanghuang clinicopathologicalcharacteristicsandprognosisofproximalanddistalgastriccancerduring19972017inchinanationalcancercenter
AT zhaodongbin clinicopathologicalcharacteristicsandprognosisofproximalanddistalgastriccancerduring19972017inchinanationalcancercenter
AT wangchengfeng clinicopathologicalcharacteristicsandprognosisofproximalanddistalgastriccancerduring19972017inchinanationalcancercenter
AT tianyantao clinicopathologicalcharacteristicsandprognosisofproximalanddistalgastriccancerduring19972017inchinanationalcancercenter
AT yuanxinghua clinicopathologicalcharacteristicsandprognosisofproximalanddistalgastriccancerduring19972017inchinanationalcancercenter
AT mafuhai clinicopathologicalcharacteristicsandprognosisofproximalanddistalgastriccancerduring19972017inchinanationalcancercenter
AT renhu clinicopathologicalcharacteristicsandprognosisofproximalanddistalgastriccancerduring19972017inchinanationalcancercenter
AT zhaoyajie clinicopathologicalcharacteristicsandprognosisofproximalanddistalgastriccancerduring19972017inchinanationalcancercenter
AT aimaitisaderbiek clinicopathologicalcharacteristicsandprognosisofproximalanddistalgastriccancerduring19972017inchinanationalcancercenter
AT zhangshuisheng clinicopathologicalcharacteristicsandprognosisofproximalanddistalgastriccancerduring19972017inchinanationalcancercenter
AT zhouhong clinicopathologicalcharacteristicsandprognosisofproximalanddistalgastriccancerduring19972017inchinanationalcancercenter
AT wangtongbo clinicopathologicalcharacteristicsandprognosisofproximalanddistalgastriccancerduring19972017inchinanationalcancercenter
AT wangnianchang clinicopathologicalcharacteristicsandprognosisofproximalanddistalgastriccancerduring19972017inchinanationalcancercenter
AT sunyuemin clinicopathologicalcharacteristicsandprognosisofproximalanddistalgastriccancerduring19972017inchinanationalcancercenter
AT baixiaofeng clinicopathologicalcharacteristicsandprognosisofproximalanddistalgastriccancerduring19972017inchinanationalcancercenter
AT chenyingtai clinicopathologicalcharacteristicsandprognosisofproximalanddistalgastriccancerduring19972017inchinanationalcancercenter