Cargando…

Identifying patients at highest-risk: the best timing to apply a readmission predictive model

BACKGROUND: Most of readmission prediction models are implemented at the time of patient discharge. However, interventions which include an early in-hospital component are critical in reducing readmissions and improving patient outcomes. Thus, at-discharge high-risk identification may be too late fo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Flaks-Manov, Natalie, Topaz, Maxim, Hoshen, Moshe, Balicer, Ran D., Shadmi, Efrat
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6595564/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31242886
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-019-0836-6
_version_ 1783430417184980992
author Flaks-Manov, Natalie
Topaz, Maxim
Hoshen, Moshe
Balicer, Ran D.
Shadmi, Efrat
author_facet Flaks-Manov, Natalie
Topaz, Maxim
Hoshen, Moshe
Balicer, Ran D.
Shadmi, Efrat
author_sort Flaks-Manov, Natalie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Most of readmission prediction models are implemented at the time of patient discharge. However, interventions which include an early in-hospital component are critical in reducing readmissions and improving patient outcomes. Thus, at-discharge high-risk identification may be too late for effective intervention. Nonetheless, the tradeoff between early versus at-discharge prediction and the optimal timing of the risk prediction model application remains to be determined. We examined a high-risk patient selection process with readmission prediction models using data available at two time points: at admission and at the time of hospital discharge. METHODS: An historical prospective study of hospitalized adults (≥65 years) discharged alive from internal medicine units in Clalit’s (the largest integrated payer-provider health fund in Israel) general hospitals in 2015. The outcome was all-cause 30-day emergency readmissions to any internal medicine ward at any hospital. We used the previously validated Preadmission Readmission Detection Model (PREADM) and developed a new model incorporating PREADM with hospital data (PREADM-H). We compared the percentage of overlap between the models and calculated the positive predictive value (PPV) for the subgroups identified by each model separately and by both models. RESULTS: The final cohort included 35,156 index hospital admissions. The PREADM-H model included 17 variables with a C-statistic of 0.68 (95% CI: 0.67–0.70) and PPV of 43.0% in the highest-risk categories. Of patients categorized by the PREADM-H in the highest-risk decile, 78% were classified similarly by the PREADM. The 22% (n = 229) classified by the PREADM-H at the highest decile, but not by the PREADM, had a PPV of 37%. Conversely, those classified by the PREADM into the highest decile but not by the PREADM-H (n = 218) had a PPV of 31%. CONCLUSIONS: The timing of readmission risk prediction makes a difference in terms of the population identified at each prediction time point – at-admission or at-discharge. Our findings suggest that readmission risk identification should incorporate a two time-point approach in which preadmission data is used to identify high-risk patients as early as possible during the index admission and an “all-hospital” model is applied at discharge to identify those that incur risk during the hospital stay.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6595564
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65955642019-08-07 Identifying patients at highest-risk: the best timing to apply a readmission predictive model Flaks-Manov, Natalie Topaz, Maxim Hoshen, Moshe Balicer, Ran D. Shadmi, Efrat BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research Article BACKGROUND: Most of readmission prediction models are implemented at the time of patient discharge. However, interventions which include an early in-hospital component are critical in reducing readmissions and improving patient outcomes. Thus, at-discharge high-risk identification may be too late for effective intervention. Nonetheless, the tradeoff between early versus at-discharge prediction and the optimal timing of the risk prediction model application remains to be determined. We examined a high-risk patient selection process with readmission prediction models using data available at two time points: at admission and at the time of hospital discharge. METHODS: An historical prospective study of hospitalized adults (≥65 years) discharged alive from internal medicine units in Clalit’s (the largest integrated payer-provider health fund in Israel) general hospitals in 2015. The outcome was all-cause 30-day emergency readmissions to any internal medicine ward at any hospital. We used the previously validated Preadmission Readmission Detection Model (PREADM) and developed a new model incorporating PREADM with hospital data (PREADM-H). We compared the percentage of overlap between the models and calculated the positive predictive value (PPV) for the subgroups identified by each model separately and by both models. RESULTS: The final cohort included 35,156 index hospital admissions. The PREADM-H model included 17 variables with a C-statistic of 0.68 (95% CI: 0.67–0.70) and PPV of 43.0% in the highest-risk categories. Of patients categorized by the PREADM-H in the highest-risk decile, 78% were classified similarly by the PREADM. The 22% (n = 229) classified by the PREADM-H at the highest decile, but not by the PREADM, had a PPV of 37%. Conversely, those classified by the PREADM into the highest decile but not by the PREADM-H (n = 218) had a PPV of 31%. CONCLUSIONS: The timing of readmission risk prediction makes a difference in terms of the population identified at each prediction time point – at-admission or at-discharge. Our findings suggest that readmission risk identification should incorporate a two time-point approach in which preadmission data is used to identify high-risk patients as early as possible during the index admission and an “all-hospital” model is applied at discharge to identify those that incur risk during the hospital stay. BioMed Central 2019-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6595564/ /pubmed/31242886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-019-0836-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Flaks-Manov, Natalie
Topaz, Maxim
Hoshen, Moshe
Balicer, Ran D.
Shadmi, Efrat
Identifying patients at highest-risk: the best timing to apply a readmission predictive model
title Identifying patients at highest-risk: the best timing to apply a readmission predictive model
title_full Identifying patients at highest-risk: the best timing to apply a readmission predictive model
title_fullStr Identifying patients at highest-risk: the best timing to apply a readmission predictive model
title_full_unstemmed Identifying patients at highest-risk: the best timing to apply a readmission predictive model
title_short Identifying patients at highest-risk: the best timing to apply a readmission predictive model
title_sort identifying patients at highest-risk: the best timing to apply a readmission predictive model
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6595564/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31242886
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-019-0836-6
work_keys_str_mv AT flaksmanovnatalie identifyingpatientsathighestriskthebesttimingtoapplyareadmissionpredictivemodel
AT topazmaxim identifyingpatientsathighestriskthebesttimingtoapplyareadmissionpredictivemodel
AT hoshenmoshe identifyingpatientsathighestriskthebesttimingtoapplyareadmissionpredictivemodel
AT balicerrand identifyingpatientsathighestriskthebesttimingtoapplyareadmissionpredictivemodel
AT shadmiefrat identifyingpatientsathighestriskthebesttimingtoapplyareadmissionpredictivemodel