Cargando…
Identifying patients at highest-risk: the best timing to apply a readmission predictive model
BACKGROUND: Most of readmission prediction models are implemented at the time of patient discharge. However, interventions which include an early in-hospital component are critical in reducing readmissions and improving patient outcomes. Thus, at-discharge high-risk identification may be too late fo...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6595564/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31242886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-019-0836-6 |
_version_ | 1783430417184980992 |
---|---|
author | Flaks-Manov, Natalie Topaz, Maxim Hoshen, Moshe Balicer, Ran D. Shadmi, Efrat |
author_facet | Flaks-Manov, Natalie Topaz, Maxim Hoshen, Moshe Balicer, Ran D. Shadmi, Efrat |
author_sort | Flaks-Manov, Natalie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Most of readmission prediction models are implemented at the time of patient discharge. However, interventions which include an early in-hospital component are critical in reducing readmissions and improving patient outcomes. Thus, at-discharge high-risk identification may be too late for effective intervention. Nonetheless, the tradeoff between early versus at-discharge prediction and the optimal timing of the risk prediction model application remains to be determined. We examined a high-risk patient selection process with readmission prediction models using data available at two time points: at admission and at the time of hospital discharge. METHODS: An historical prospective study of hospitalized adults (≥65 years) discharged alive from internal medicine units in Clalit’s (the largest integrated payer-provider health fund in Israel) general hospitals in 2015. The outcome was all-cause 30-day emergency readmissions to any internal medicine ward at any hospital. We used the previously validated Preadmission Readmission Detection Model (PREADM) and developed a new model incorporating PREADM with hospital data (PREADM-H). We compared the percentage of overlap between the models and calculated the positive predictive value (PPV) for the subgroups identified by each model separately and by both models. RESULTS: The final cohort included 35,156 index hospital admissions. The PREADM-H model included 17 variables with a C-statistic of 0.68 (95% CI: 0.67–0.70) and PPV of 43.0% in the highest-risk categories. Of patients categorized by the PREADM-H in the highest-risk decile, 78% were classified similarly by the PREADM. The 22% (n = 229) classified by the PREADM-H at the highest decile, but not by the PREADM, had a PPV of 37%. Conversely, those classified by the PREADM into the highest decile but not by the PREADM-H (n = 218) had a PPV of 31%. CONCLUSIONS: The timing of readmission risk prediction makes a difference in terms of the population identified at each prediction time point – at-admission or at-discharge. Our findings suggest that readmission risk identification should incorporate a two time-point approach in which preadmission data is used to identify high-risk patients as early as possible during the index admission and an “all-hospital” model is applied at discharge to identify those that incur risk during the hospital stay. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6595564 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-65955642019-08-07 Identifying patients at highest-risk: the best timing to apply a readmission predictive model Flaks-Manov, Natalie Topaz, Maxim Hoshen, Moshe Balicer, Ran D. Shadmi, Efrat BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research Article BACKGROUND: Most of readmission prediction models are implemented at the time of patient discharge. However, interventions which include an early in-hospital component are critical in reducing readmissions and improving patient outcomes. Thus, at-discharge high-risk identification may be too late for effective intervention. Nonetheless, the tradeoff between early versus at-discharge prediction and the optimal timing of the risk prediction model application remains to be determined. We examined a high-risk patient selection process with readmission prediction models using data available at two time points: at admission and at the time of hospital discharge. METHODS: An historical prospective study of hospitalized adults (≥65 years) discharged alive from internal medicine units in Clalit’s (the largest integrated payer-provider health fund in Israel) general hospitals in 2015. The outcome was all-cause 30-day emergency readmissions to any internal medicine ward at any hospital. We used the previously validated Preadmission Readmission Detection Model (PREADM) and developed a new model incorporating PREADM with hospital data (PREADM-H). We compared the percentage of overlap between the models and calculated the positive predictive value (PPV) for the subgroups identified by each model separately and by both models. RESULTS: The final cohort included 35,156 index hospital admissions. The PREADM-H model included 17 variables with a C-statistic of 0.68 (95% CI: 0.67–0.70) and PPV of 43.0% in the highest-risk categories. Of patients categorized by the PREADM-H in the highest-risk decile, 78% were classified similarly by the PREADM. The 22% (n = 229) classified by the PREADM-H at the highest decile, but not by the PREADM, had a PPV of 37%. Conversely, those classified by the PREADM into the highest decile but not by the PREADM-H (n = 218) had a PPV of 31%. CONCLUSIONS: The timing of readmission risk prediction makes a difference in terms of the population identified at each prediction time point – at-admission or at-discharge. Our findings suggest that readmission risk identification should incorporate a two time-point approach in which preadmission data is used to identify high-risk patients as early as possible during the index admission and an “all-hospital” model is applied at discharge to identify those that incur risk during the hospital stay. BioMed Central 2019-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6595564/ /pubmed/31242886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-019-0836-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Flaks-Manov, Natalie Topaz, Maxim Hoshen, Moshe Balicer, Ran D. Shadmi, Efrat Identifying patients at highest-risk: the best timing to apply a readmission predictive model |
title | Identifying patients at highest-risk: the best timing to apply a readmission predictive model |
title_full | Identifying patients at highest-risk: the best timing to apply a readmission predictive model |
title_fullStr | Identifying patients at highest-risk: the best timing to apply a readmission predictive model |
title_full_unstemmed | Identifying patients at highest-risk: the best timing to apply a readmission predictive model |
title_short | Identifying patients at highest-risk: the best timing to apply a readmission predictive model |
title_sort | identifying patients at highest-risk: the best timing to apply a readmission predictive model |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6595564/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31242886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-019-0836-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT flaksmanovnatalie identifyingpatientsathighestriskthebesttimingtoapplyareadmissionpredictivemodel AT topazmaxim identifyingpatientsathighestriskthebesttimingtoapplyareadmissionpredictivemodel AT hoshenmoshe identifyingpatientsathighestriskthebesttimingtoapplyareadmissionpredictivemodel AT balicerrand identifyingpatientsathighestriskthebesttimingtoapplyareadmissionpredictivemodel AT shadmiefrat identifyingpatientsathighestriskthebesttimingtoapplyareadmissionpredictivemodel |