Cargando…

Suture-bridge technique for tibial avulsion fractures of the posterior cruciate ligament - a biomechanical comparison

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Tibial posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) avulsion fractures require surgical fixation in order to provide primary stability and adequate bone healing. Small fragments are common and comprise the risk to fracturing during screw fixation. Therefore, a suture-bridge configuration w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Willinger, Lukas, Lacheta, Lucca, von Deimmling, Constantin, Lang, Jan, Imhoff, Andreas, Forkel, Philipp
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6595662/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967119S00226
_version_ 1783430440128872448
author Willinger, Lukas
Lacheta, Lucca
von Deimmling, Constantin
Lang, Jan
Imhoff, Andreas
Forkel, Philipp
author_facet Willinger, Lukas
Lacheta, Lucca
von Deimmling, Constantin
Lang, Jan
Imhoff, Andreas
Forkel, Philipp
author_sort Willinger, Lukas
collection PubMed
description AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Tibial posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) avulsion fractures require surgical fixation in order to provide primary stability and adequate bone healing. Small fragments are common and comprise the risk to fracturing during screw fixation. Therefore, a suture-bridge configuration was developed to fixate small and multifragment fractures without the need of fragment drilling. The purpose of this study was to analyze the biomechanical properties of the suture-bridge technique compared to a well-established transtibial cortical suspension technique concerning cyclic elongation, stiffness and ultimate failure load. It was hypothesized that the suture bridge technique shows lower cyclic elongation and higher load to failure force compared to a cortical suspension button fixation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees were biomechanically tested using an industrial testing machine (Zwick/Roell Amsler HC 10, Ulm). A standardized bony avulsion fracture (15 x 10 x 4 mm) of the tibial PCL insertion was generated. Two different techniques were used for fixation: A) 4x suture-bridge configuration (3 SwiveLock anchors, FiberTape, Arthrex Inc.) and B) 5x transtibial cortical suspension button fixation (FiberTape, Arthrex Inc). Cyclic loading was applied in 90° of flexion 500 times (10 to 100 N) to determine elongation, initial stiffness and load to failure. Students t-test for unpaired samples were used to calculate the difference of means (SPSS statistics software version 21). Statistical significance was set at a p value of < 0.05. RESULTS: Suture-bridge technique resulted in a significant lower elongation (4.5 ± 2.9 mm) than transtibial cortical suspension button technique (11.9 ± 3.1 mm, p<0.01). Load of failure testing exhibited 319.8 ± 79.7 N in Group A and 232.6 ± 108.2 N in Group B (p=0.21). The initial stiffness at the beginning of cyclic loading was 45.0 ± 7.7 N/mm in Group A und 40.9 ± 10.0 N/mm in Group B (p=0.52). CONCLUSION: The novel PCL suture-bridge technique provides a significant lower construct elongation during cyclic loading and a trend towards higher load to failure in comparison to cortical suspension button fixation. As a clinical consequence, suture-bridge technique should be considered to fix small PCL avulsion fractures at the tibial insertion site.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6595662
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65956622019-07-01 Suture-bridge technique for tibial avulsion fractures of the posterior cruciate ligament - a biomechanical comparison Willinger, Lukas Lacheta, Lucca von Deimmling, Constantin Lang, Jan Imhoff, Andreas Forkel, Philipp Orthop J Sports Med Article AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Tibial posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) avulsion fractures require surgical fixation in order to provide primary stability and adequate bone healing. Small fragments are common and comprise the risk to fracturing during screw fixation. Therefore, a suture-bridge configuration was developed to fixate small and multifragment fractures without the need of fragment drilling. The purpose of this study was to analyze the biomechanical properties of the suture-bridge technique compared to a well-established transtibial cortical suspension technique concerning cyclic elongation, stiffness and ultimate failure load. It was hypothesized that the suture bridge technique shows lower cyclic elongation and higher load to failure force compared to a cortical suspension button fixation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees were biomechanically tested using an industrial testing machine (Zwick/Roell Amsler HC 10, Ulm). A standardized bony avulsion fracture (15 x 10 x 4 mm) of the tibial PCL insertion was generated. Two different techniques were used for fixation: A) 4x suture-bridge configuration (3 SwiveLock anchors, FiberTape, Arthrex Inc.) and B) 5x transtibial cortical suspension button fixation (FiberTape, Arthrex Inc). Cyclic loading was applied in 90° of flexion 500 times (10 to 100 N) to determine elongation, initial stiffness and load to failure. Students t-test for unpaired samples were used to calculate the difference of means (SPSS statistics software version 21). Statistical significance was set at a p value of < 0.05. RESULTS: Suture-bridge technique resulted in a significant lower elongation (4.5 ± 2.9 mm) than transtibial cortical suspension button technique (11.9 ± 3.1 mm, p<0.01). Load of failure testing exhibited 319.8 ± 79.7 N in Group A and 232.6 ± 108.2 N in Group B (p=0.21). The initial stiffness at the beginning of cyclic loading was 45.0 ± 7.7 N/mm in Group A und 40.9 ± 10.0 N/mm in Group B (p=0.52). CONCLUSION: The novel PCL suture-bridge technique provides a significant lower construct elongation during cyclic loading and a trend towards higher load to failure in comparison to cortical suspension button fixation. As a clinical consequence, suture-bridge technique should be considered to fix small PCL avulsion fractures at the tibial insertion site. SAGE Publications 2019-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6595662/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967119S00226 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This open-access article is published and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits the noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction of the article in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this article without the permission of the Author(s). For article reuse guidelines, please visit SAGE’s website at http://www.sagepub.com/journals-permissions.
spellingShingle Article
Willinger, Lukas
Lacheta, Lucca
von Deimmling, Constantin
Lang, Jan
Imhoff, Andreas
Forkel, Philipp
Suture-bridge technique for tibial avulsion fractures of the posterior cruciate ligament - a biomechanical comparison
title Suture-bridge technique for tibial avulsion fractures of the posterior cruciate ligament - a biomechanical comparison
title_full Suture-bridge technique for tibial avulsion fractures of the posterior cruciate ligament - a biomechanical comparison
title_fullStr Suture-bridge technique for tibial avulsion fractures of the posterior cruciate ligament - a biomechanical comparison
title_full_unstemmed Suture-bridge technique for tibial avulsion fractures of the posterior cruciate ligament - a biomechanical comparison
title_short Suture-bridge technique for tibial avulsion fractures of the posterior cruciate ligament - a biomechanical comparison
title_sort suture-bridge technique for tibial avulsion fractures of the posterior cruciate ligament - a biomechanical comparison
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6595662/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967119S00226
work_keys_str_mv AT willingerlukas suturebridgetechniquefortibialavulsionfracturesoftheposteriorcruciateligamentabiomechanicalcomparison
AT lachetalucca suturebridgetechniquefortibialavulsionfracturesoftheposteriorcruciateligamentabiomechanicalcomparison
AT vondeimmlingconstantin suturebridgetechniquefortibialavulsionfracturesoftheposteriorcruciateligamentabiomechanicalcomparison
AT langjan suturebridgetechniquefortibialavulsionfracturesoftheposteriorcruciateligamentabiomechanicalcomparison
AT imhoffandreas suturebridgetechniquefortibialavulsionfracturesoftheposteriorcruciateligamentabiomechanicalcomparison
AT forkelphilipp suturebridgetechniquefortibialavulsionfracturesoftheposteriorcruciateligamentabiomechanicalcomparison