Cargando…

Development and clinical validation of inertial sensor-based gait-clustering methods in Parkinson’s disease

BACKGROUND: Gait symptoms and balance impairment are characteristic indicators for the progression in Parkinson’s disease (PD). Current gait assessments mostly focus on straight strides with assumed constant velocity, while acceleration/deceleration and turning strides are often ignored. This is eit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nguyen, An, Roth, Nils, Ghassemi, Nooshin Haji, Hannink, Julius, Seel, Thomas, Klucken, Jochen, Gassner, Heiko, Eskofier, Bjoern M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6595695/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31242915
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-019-0548-2
_version_ 1783430447891480576
author Nguyen, An
Roth, Nils
Ghassemi, Nooshin Haji
Hannink, Julius
Seel, Thomas
Klucken, Jochen
Gassner, Heiko
Eskofier, Bjoern M.
author_facet Nguyen, An
Roth, Nils
Ghassemi, Nooshin Haji
Hannink, Julius
Seel, Thomas
Klucken, Jochen
Gassner, Heiko
Eskofier, Bjoern M.
author_sort Nguyen, An
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Gait symptoms and balance impairment are characteristic indicators for the progression in Parkinson’s disease (PD). Current gait assessments mostly focus on straight strides with assumed constant velocity, while acceleration/deceleration and turning strides are often ignored. This is either due to the set up of typical clinical assessments or technical limitations in capture volume. Wearable inertial measurement units are a promising and unobtrusive technology to overcome these limitations. Other gait phases such as initiation, termination, transitioning (between straight walking and turning) and turning might be relevant as well for the evaluation of gait and balance impairments in PD. METHOD: In a cohort of 119 PD patients, we applied unsupervised algorithms to find different gait clusters which potentially include the clinically relevant information from distinct gait phases in the standardized 4x10 m gait test. To clinically validate our approach, we determined the discriminative power in each gait cluster to classify between impaired and unimpaired PD patients and compared it to baseline (analyzing all straight strides). RESULTS: As a main result, analyzing only one of the gait clusters constant, non-constant or turning led in each case to a better classification performance in comparison to the baseline (increase of area under the curve (AUC) up to 19% relative to baseline). Furthermore, gait parameters (for turning, constant and non-constant gait) that best predict motor impairment in PD were identified. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that a more detailed analysis in terms of different gait clusters of standardized gait tests such as the 4x10 m walk may give more insights about the clinically relevant motor impairment in PD patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6595695
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65956952019-08-07 Development and clinical validation of inertial sensor-based gait-clustering methods in Parkinson’s disease Nguyen, An Roth, Nils Ghassemi, Nooshin Haji Hannink, Julius Seel, Thomas Klucken, Jochen Gassner, Heiko Eskofier, Bjoern M. J Neuroeng Rehabil Research BACKGROUND: Gait symptoms and balance impairment are characteristic indicators for the progression in Parkinson’s disease (PD). Current gait assessments mostly focus on straight strides with assumed constant velocity, while acceleration/deceleration and turning strides are often ignored. This is either due to the set up of typical clinical assessments or technical limitations in capture volume. Wearable inertial measurement units are a promising and unobtrusive technology to overcome these limitations. Other gait phases such as initiation, termination, transitioning (between straight walking and turning) and turning might be relevant as well for the evaluation of gait and balance impairments in PD. METHOD: In a cohort of 119 PD patients, we applied unsupervised algorithms to find different gait clusters which potentially include the clinically relevant information from distinct gait phases in the standardized 4x10 m gait test. To clinically validate our approach, we determined the discriminative power in each gait cluster to classify between impaired and unimpaired PD patients and compared it to baseline (analyzing all straight strides). RESULTS: As a main result, analyzing only one of the gait clusters constant, non-constant or turning led in each case to a better classification performance in comparison to the baseline (increase of area under the curve (AUC) up to 19% relative to baseline). Furthermore, gait parameters (for turning, constant and non-constant gait) that best predict motor impairment in PD were identified. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that a more detailed analysis in terms of different gait clusters of standardized gait tests such as the 4x10 m walk may give more insights about the clinically relevant motor impairment in PD patients. BioMed Central 2019-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6595695/ /pubmed/31242915 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-019-0548-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver(http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Nguyen, An
Roth, Nils
Ghassemi, Nooshin Haji
Hannink, Julius
Seel, Thomas
Klucken, Jochen
Gassner, Heiko
Eskofier, Bjoern M.
Development and clinical validation of inertial sensor-based gait-clustering methods in Parkinson’s disease
title Development and clinical validation of inertial sensor-based gait-clustering methods in Parkinson’s disease
title_full Development and clinical validation of inertial sensor-based gait-clustering methods in Parkinson’s disease
title_fullStr Development and clinical validation of inertial sensor-based gait-clustering methods in Parkinson’s disease
title_full_unstemmed Development and clinical validation of inertial sensor-based gait-clustering methods in Parkinson’s disease
title_short Development and clinical validation of inertial sensor-based gait-clustering methods in Parkinson’s disease
title_sort development and clinical validation of inertial sensor-based gait-clustering methods in parkinson’s disease
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6595695/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31242915
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-019-0548-2
work_keys_str_mv AT nguyenan developmentandclinicalvalidationofinertialsensorbasedgaitclusteringmethodsinparkinsonsdisease
AT rothnils developmentandclinicalvalidationofinertialsensorbasedgaitclusteringmethodsinparkinsonsdisease
AT ghasseminooshinhaji developmentandclinicalvalidationofinertialsensorbasedgaitclusteringmethodsinparkinsonsdisease
AT hanninkjulius developmentandclinicalvalidationofinertialsensorbasedgaitclusteringmethodsinparkinsonsdisease
AT seelthomas developmentandclinicalvalidationofinertialsensorbasedgaitclusteringmethodsinparkinsonsdisease
AT kluckenjochen developmentandclinicalvalidationofinertialsensorbasedgaitclusteringmethodsinparkinsonsdisease
AT gassnerheiko developmentandclinicalvalidationofinertialsensorbasedgaitclusteringmethodsinparkinsonsdisease
AT eskofierbjoernm developmentandclinicalvalidationofinertialsensorbasedgaitclusteringmethodsinparkinsonsdisease