Cargando…

Understanding client and provider perspectives of antenatal care service quality: a qualitative multi-method study from Tanzania

BACKGROUND: Measures of quality of care in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) rarely include experience of care. This gap in service quality metrics may be driven by a lack of understanding of client and provider perspectives. Understanding these perspectives is a critical first step in not on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sheffel, Ashley, Heidkamp, Rebecca, Mpembeni, Rose, Bujari, Peter, Gupta, Jaya, Niyeha, Debora, Aung, Tricia, Bakengesa, Victor, Msuya, John, Munos, Melinda, Kennedy, Caitlin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Edinburgh University Global Health Society 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6596286/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31275570
http://dx.doi.org/10.7189/jogh.09.01101
_version_ 1783430490347274240
author Sheffel, Ashley
Heidkamp, Rebecca
Mpembeni, Rose
Bujari, Peter
Gupta, Jaya
Niyeha, Debora
Aung, Tricia
Bakengesa, Victor
Msuya, John
Munos, Melinda
Kennedy, Caitlin
author_facet Sheffel, Ashley
Heidkamp, Rebecca
Mpembeni, Rose
Bujari, Peter
Gupta, Jaya
Niyeha, Debora
Aung, Tricia
Bakengesa, Victor
Msuya, John
Munos, Melinda
Kennedy, Caitlin
author_sort Sheffel, Ashley
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Measures of quality of care in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) rarely include experience of care. This gap in service quality metrics may be driven by a lack of understanding of client and provider perspectives. Understanding these perspectives is a critical first step in not only improving metrics, but also in improving service delivery. This study identifies the items antenatal care (ANC) clients and health care providers in Tanzania associate with a quality ANC service and explores the experience of care domain from both client and provider perspectives. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured interviews with15 providers and 35 clients in Tanzania that included a free-listing activity to elicit items clients and providers associate with quality ANC services. We analyzed the free-listing for rank order and frequency to identify the most salient items, which were included in the second phase of data collection. We then conducted semi-structured interviews with a pile sort activity with the same 15 providers and 32 new clients to understand the importance of the items identified in the free-listing. We used a thematic analysis driven by the framework approach to analyze interview data. RESULTS: Both clients and providers perceived quality of ANC as being comprised of items related to experience of care, provision of care, and cross-cutting essential physical and human resources. The free-listing findings illuminated that the experience of care was equally important to clients and providers as the availability of physical and human resources and the content of the care delivered. In addition, clients and providers perceived that a positive patient care experience – marked by good communication, active listening, keeping confidentiality, and being spoken to politely – increased utilization of health services and improved health outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The experience of care in LMICs is an overlooked, yet critically important topic. Understanding the experience of care from those who receive and deliver services is key to measuring and improving the quality of ANC. Our research highlights the importance of incorporating experience of care into future quality improvement activities and quality measures. By doing so, we identify barriers and facilitating factors of practical use to policy-makers and governments in LMICs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6596286
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Edinburgh University Global Health Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65962862019-07-02 Understanding client and provider perspectives of antenatal care service quality: a qualitative multi-method study from Tanzania Sheffel, Ashley Heidkamp, Rebecca Mpembeni, Rose Bujari, Peter Gupta, Jaya Niyeha, Debora Aung, Tricia Bakengesa, Victor Msuya, John Munos, Melinda Kennedy, Caitlin J Glob Health Research Theme 7: National Evaluation Platform BACKGROUND: Measures of quality of care in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) rarely include experience of care. This gap in service quality metrics may be driven by a lack of understanding of client and provider perspectives. Understanding these perspectives is a critical first step in not only improving metrics, but also in improving service delivery. This study identifies the items antenatal care (ANC) clients and health care providers in Tanzania associate with a quality ANC service and explores the experience of care domain from both client and provider perspectives. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured interviews with15 providers and 35 clients in Tanzania that included a free-listing activity to elicit items clients and providers associate with quality ANC services. We analyzed the free-listing for rank order and frequency to identify the most salient items, which were included in the second phase of data collection. We then conducted semi-structured interviews with a pile sort activity with the same 15 providers and 32 new clients to understand the importance of the items identified in the free-listing. We used a thematic analysis driven by the framework approach to analyze interview data. RESULTS: Both clients and providers perceived quality of ANC as being comprised of items related to experience of care, provision of care, and cross-cutting essential physical and human resources. The free-listing findings illuminated that the experience of care was equally important to clients and providers as the availability of physical and human resources and the content of the care delivered. In addition, clients and providers perceived that a positive patient care experience – marked by good communication, active listening, keeping confidentiality, and being spoken to politely – increased utilization of health services and improved health outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The experience of care in LMICs is an overlooked, yet critically important topic. Understanding the experience of care from those who receive and deliver services is key to measuring and improving the quality of ANC. Our research highlights the importance of incorporating experience of care into future quality improvement activities and quality measures. By doing so, we identify barriers and facilitating factors of practical use to policy-makers and governments in LMICs. Edinburgh University Global Health Society 2019-06 2019-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6596286/ /pubmed/31275570 http://dx.doi.org/10.7189/jogh.09.01101 Text en Copyright © 2019 by the Journal of Global Health. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Research Theme 7: National Evaluation Platform
Sheffel, Ashley
Heidkamp, Rebecca
Mpembeni, Rose
Bujari, Peter
Gupta, Jaya
Niyeha, Debora
Aung, Tricia
Bakengesa, Victor
Msuya, John
Munos, Melinda
Kennedy, Caitlin
Understanding client and provider perspectives of antenatal care service quality: a qualitative multi-method study from Tanzania
title Understanding client and provider perspectives of antenatal care service quality: a qualitative multi-method study from Tanzania
title_full Understanding client and provider perspectives of antenatal care service quality: a qualitative multi-method study from Tanzania
title_fullStr Understanding client and provider perspectives of antenatal care service quality: a qualitative multi-method study from Tanzania
title_full_unstemmed Understanding client and provider perspectives of antenatal care service quality: a qualitative multi-method study from Tanzania
title_short Understanding client and provider perspectives of antenatal care service quality: a qualitative multi-method study from Tanzania
title_sort understanding client and provider perspectives of antenatal care service quality: a qualitative multi-method study from tanzania
topic Research Theme 7: National Evaluation Platform
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6596286/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31275570
http://dx.doi.org/10.7189/jogh.09.01101
work_keys_str_mv AT sheffelashley understandingclientandproviderperspectivesofantenatalcareservicequalityaqualitativemultimethodstudyfromtanzania
AT heidkamprebecca understandingclientandproviderperspectivesofantenatalcareservicequalityaqualitativemultimethodstudyfromtanzania
AT mpembenirose understandingclientandproviderperspectivesofantenatalcareservicequalityaqualitativemultimethodstudyfromtanzania
AT bujaripeter understandingclientandproviderperspectivesofantenatalcareservicequalityaqualitativemultimethodstudyfromtanzania
AT guptajaya understandingclientandproviderperspectivesofantenatalcareservicequalityaqualitativemultimethodstudyfromtanzania
AT niyehadebora understandingclientandproviderperspectivesofantenatalcareservicequalityaqualitativemultimethodstudyfromtanzania
AT aungtricia understandingclientandproviderperspectivesofantenatalcareservicequalityaqualitativemultimethodstudyfromtanzania
AT bakengesavictor understandingclientandproviderperspectivesofantenatalcareservicequalityaqualitativemultimethodstudyfromtanzania
AT msuyajohn understandingclientandproviderperspectivesofantenatalcareservicequalityaqualitativemultimethodstudyfromtanzania
AT munosmelinda understandingclientandproviderperspectivesofantenatalcareservicequalityaqualitativemultimethodstudyfromtanzania
AT kennedycaitlin understandingclientandproviderperspectivesofantenatalcareservicequalityaqualitativemultimethodstudyfromtanzania