Cargando…

Investigation of perioperative work processes in provision of antibiotic prophylaxis: a prospective descriptive qualitative study across surgical specialties in Norway

OBJECTIVE: Surgical site infections are known postoperative complications, yet the most preventable of healthcare-associated infections. Correct provision of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP) is crucial. Use of the WHO Safe Surgical Checklist (SSC) has been reported to improve provision of SAP,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wæhle, Hilde Valen, Harthug, Stig, Søfteland, Eirik, Sevdalis, Nick, Smith, Ingrid, Wiig, Siri, Aase, Karina, Haugen, Arvid Steinar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6596935/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31230033
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029671
_version_ 1783430517920628736
author Wæhle, Hilde Valen
Harthug, Stig
Søfteland, Eirik
Sevdalis, Nick
Smith, Ingrid
Wiig, Siri
Aase, Karina
Haugen, Arvid Steinar
author_facet Wæhle, Hilde Valen
Harthug, Stig
Søfteland, Eirik
Sevdalis, Nick
Smith, Ingrid
Wiig, Siri
Aase, Karina
Haugen, Arvid Steinar
author_sort Wæhle, Hilde Valen
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Surgical site infections are known postoperative complications, yet the most preventable of healthcare-associated infections. Correct provision of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP) is crucial. Use of the WHO Safe Surgical Checklist (SSC) has been reported to improve provision of SAP, and reduce infections postoperatively. To understand possible mechanisms and interactions generating such effects, we explored the underlying work processes of SAP provision and SSC performance at the intersection of perioperative procedures and actual team working. DESIGN: An ethnographic study including observations and in-depth interviews. A combination of deductive and inductive content analysis of the data was conducted. SETTING: Operating theatres with different surgical specialities, in three Norwegian hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Observations of perioperative team working (40 hours) and in-depth interviews of 19 experienced perioperative team members were conducted. Interview participants followed a maximum variation purposive sampling strategy. RESULTS: Analysis identified provision of SAP as a process of linked activities; sequenced, yet disconnected in time and space throughout the perioperative phase. Provision of SAP was handled in relation to several interactive factors: preparation and administration, prescription accuracy, diversity of prescription order systems, patient-specific conditions and changes in operating theatre schedules. However, prescription checks were performed either as formal SSC reviews of SAP items or as informal checks of relevant documents. In addition, use of cognitive reminders and clinical experiences were identified as mechanisms used to enable administration of SAP within the 60 min timeframe described in the SSC. CONCLUSION: Provision of SAP was identified as a complex process. Yet, a key element in provision of SAP was the given 60 min. timeframe of administration before incision, provided in the SSC. Thus, the SSC seems beneficial in supporting timely SAP administration practice by either being a cognitive tool and/or as a cognitive intervention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6596935
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65969352019-07-18 Investigation of perioperative work processes in provision of antibiotic prophylaxis: a prospective descriptive qualitative study across surgical specialties in Norway Wæhle, Hilde Valen Harthug, Stig Søfteland, Eirik Sevdalis, Nick Smith, Ingrid Wiig, Siri Aase, Karina Haugen, Arvid Steinar BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVE: Surgical site infections are known postoperative complications, yet the most preventable of healthcare-associated infections. Correct provision of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP) is crucial. Use of the WHO Safe Surgical Checklist (SSC) has been reported to improve provision of SAP, and reduce infections postoperatively. To understand possible mechanisms and interactions generating such effects, we explored the underlying work processes of SAP provision and SSC performance at the intersection of perioperative procedures and actual team working. DESIGN: An ethnographic study including observations and in-depth interviews. A combination of deductive and inductive content analysis of the data was conducted. SETTING: Operating theatres with different surgical specialities, in three Norwegian hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Observations of perioperative team working (40 hours) and in-depth interviews of 19 experienced perioperative team members were conducted. Interview participants followed a maximum variation purposive sampling strategy. RESULTS: Analysis identified provision of SAP as a process of linked activities; sequenced, yet disconnected in time and space throughout the perioperative phase. Provision of SAP was handled in relation to several interactive factors: preparation and administration, prescription accuracy, diversity of prescription order systems, patient-specific conditions and changes in operating theatre schedules. However, prescription checks were performed either as formal SSC reviews of SAP items or as informal checks of relevant documents. In addition, use of cognitive reminders and clinical experiences were identified as mechanisms used to enable administration of SAP within the 60 min timeframe described in the SSC. CONCLUSION: Provision of SAP was identified as a complex process. Yet, a key element in provision of SAP was the given 60 min. timeframe of administration before incision, provided in the SSC. Thus, the SSC seems beneficial in supporting timely SAP administration practice by either being a cognitive tool and/or as a cognitive intervention. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6596935/ /pubmed/31230033 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029671 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Wæhle, Hilde Valen
Harthug, Stig
Søfteland, Eirik
Sevdalis, Nick
Smith, Ingrid
Wiig, Siri
Aase, Karina
Haugen, Arvid Steinar
Investigation of perioperative work processes in provision of antibiotic prophylaxis: a prospective descriptive qualitative study across surgical specialties in Norway
title Investigation of perioperative work processes in provision of antibiotic prophylaxis: a prospective descriptive qualitative study across surgical specialties in Norway
title_full Investigation of perioperative work processes in provision of antibiotic prophylaxis: a prospective descriptive qualitative study across surgical specialties in Norway
title_fullStr Investigation of perioperative work processes in provision of antibiotic prophylaxis: a prospective descriptive qualitative study across surgical specialties in Norway
title_full_unstemmed Investigation of perioperative work processes in provision of antibiotic prophylaxis: a prospective descriptive qualitative study across surgical specialties in Norway
title_short Investigation of perioperative work processes in provision of antibiotic prophylaxis: a prospective descriptive qualitative study across surgical specialties in Norway
title_sort investigation of perioperative work processes in provision of antibiotic prophylaxis: a prospective descriptive qualitative study across surgical specialties in norway
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6596935/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31230033
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029671
work_keys_str_mv AT wæhlehildevalen investigationofperioperativeworkprocessesinprovisionofantibioticprophylaxisaprospectivedescriptivequalitativestudyacrosssurgicalspecialtiesinnorway
AT harthugstig investigationofperioperativeworkprocessesinprovisionofantibioticprophylaxisaprospectivedescriptivequalitativestudyacrosssurgicalspecialtiesinnorway
AT søftelandeirik investigationofperioperativeworkprocessesinprovisionofantibioticprophylaxisaprospectivedescriptivequalitativestudyacrosssurgicalspecialtiesinnorway
AT sevdalisnick investigationofperioperativeworkprocessesinprovisionofantibioticprophylaxisaprospectivedescriptivequalitativestudyacrosssurgicalspecialtiesinnorway
AT smithingrid investigationofperioperativeworkprocessesinprovisionofantibioticprophylaxisaprospectivedescriptivequalitativestudyacrosssurgicalspecialtiesinnorway
AT wiigsiri investigationofperioperativeworkprocessesinprovisionofantibioticprophylaxisaprospectivedescriptivequalitativestudyacrosssurgicalspecialtiesinnorway
AT aasekarina investigationofperioperativeworkprocessesinprovisionofantibioticprophylaxisaprospectivedescriptivequalitativestudyacrosssurgicalspecialtiesinnorway
AT haugenarvidsteinar investigationofperioperativeworkprocessesinprovisionofantibioticprophylaxisaprospectivedescriptivequalitativestudyacrosssurgicalspecialtiesinnorway