Cargando…

Evaluating possible intended and unintended consequences of the implementation of alcohol minimum unit pricing (MUP) in Scotland: a natural experiment protocol

INTRODUCTION: Scotland is the first country to carry out a national implementation of minimum unit pricing (MUP) for alcohol. MUP aims to reduce alcohol-related harms, which are high in Scotland compared with Western Europe, and to improve health equalities. MUP is a minimum retail price per unit of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal, Beeston, Clare, Millard, Andrew, Forsyth, Ross, Deluca, Paolo, Drummond, Colin, Eadie, Douglas, Graham, Lesley, Hilton, Shona, Ludbrook, Anne, McCartney, Gerry, Phillips, Thomas, Stead, Martine, Ford, Allison, Bond, Lyndal, Leyland, Alastair H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6596978/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31221890
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028482
_version_ 1783430528128516096
author Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal
Beeston, Clare
Millard, Andrew
Forsyth, Ross
Deluca, Paolo
Drummond, Colin
Eadie, Douglas
Graham, Lesley
Hilton, Shona
Ludbrook, Anne
McCartney, Gerry
Phillips, Thomas
Stead, Martine
Ford, Allison
Bond, Lyndal
Leyland, Alastair H
author_facet Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal
Beeston, Clare
Millard, Andrew
Forsyth, Ross
Deluca, Paolo
Drummond, Colin
Eadie, Douglas
Graham, Lesley
Hilton, Shona
Ludbrook, Anne
McCartney, Gerry
Phillips, Thomas
Stead, Martine
Ford, Allison
Bond, Lyndal
Leyland, Alastair H
author_sort Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Scotland is the first country to carry out a national implementation of minimum unit pricing (MUP) for alcohol. MUP aims to reduce alcohol-related harms, which are high in Scotland compared with Western Europe, and to improve health equalities. MUP is a minimum retail price per unit of alcohol. That approach targets high-risk alcohol users. This work is key to a wider evaluation that will determine whether MUP continues. There are three study components. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Component 1 sampled an estimated 2800 interviewees at a baseline and each of two follow-ups from four Emergency Departments in Scotland and Northern England. Research nurses administered a standardised survey to assess alcohol consumption and the proportion of attendances that were alcohol-related. Component 2 covered six Sexual Health Clinics with similar timings and country allocation. A self-completion survey gathered information on potential unintended effects of MUP on alcohol source and drug use. Using a natural experiment design and repeated cross-sectional audit, difference between Scotland (intervention) and North England (control) will be tested for outcomes using regression adjusting for differences at baseline. Differential impacts by age, gender and socioeconomic position will be investigated. Component 3 used focus groups with young people and heavy drinkers and interviews with stakeholders before and after MUP implementation. The focus groups will allow exploration of attitudes, experiences and behaviours and the potential mechanisms by which impacts arise. The interviews will help characterise the implementation process. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Study components 1 and 2 have been ethically approved by the NHS, and component 3 by the University of Stirling. Dissemination plans include peer-reviewed journal articles, presentations, policy maker briefings and, in view of high public interest and the high political profile of this flagship policy, communication with the public via media engagement and plain language summaries. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN16039407; Pre-results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6596978
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65969782019-07-18 Evaluating possible intended and unintended consequences of the implementation of alcohol minimum unit pricing (MUP) in Scotland: a natural experiment protocol Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal Beeston, Clare Millard, Andrew Forsyth, Ross Deluca, Paolo Drummond, Colin Eadie, Douglas Graham, Lesley Hilton, Shona Ludbrook, Anne McCartney, Gerry Phillips, Thomas Stead, Martine Ford, Allison Bond, Lyndal Leyland, Alastair H BMJ Open Addiction INTRODUCTION: Scotland is the first country to carry out a national implementation of minimum unit pricing (MUP) for alcohol. MUP aims to reduce alcohol-related harms, which are high in Scotland compared with Western Europe, and to improve health equalities. MUP is a minimum retail price per unit of alcohol. That approach targets high-risk alcohol users. This work is key to a wider evaluation that will determine whether MUP continues. There are three study components. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Component 1 sampled an estimated 2800 interviewees at a baseline and each of two follow-ups from four Emergency Departments in Scotland and Northern England. Research nurses administered a standardised survey to assess alcohol consumption and the proportion of attendances that were alcohol-related. Component 2 covered six Sexual Health Clinics with similar timings and country allocation. A self-completion survey gathered information on potential unintended effects of MUP on alcohol source and drug use. Using a natural experiment design and repeated cross-sectional audit, difference between Scotland (intervention) and North England (control) will be tested for outcomes using regression adjusting for differences at baseline. Differential impacts by age, gender and socioeconomic position will be investigated. Component 3 used focus groups with young people and heavy drinkers and interviews with stakeholders before and after MUP implementation. The focus groups will allow exploration of attitudes, experiences and behaviours and the potential mechanisms by which impacts arise. The interviews will help characterise the implementation process. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Study components 1 and 2 have been ethically approved by the NHS, and component 3 by the University of Stirling. Dissemination plans include peer-reviewed journal articles, presentations, policy maker briefings and, in view of high public interest and the high political profile of this flagship policy, communication with the public via media engagement and plain language summaries. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN16039407; Pre-results. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6596978/ /pubmed/31221890 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028482 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Addiction
Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal
Beeston, Clare
Millard, Andrew
Forsyth, Ross
Deluca, Paolo
Drummond, Colin
Eadie, Douglas
Graham, Lesley
Hilton, Shona
Ludbrook, Anne
McCartney, Gerry
Phillips, Thomas
Stead, Martine
Ford, Allison
Bond, Lyndal
Leyland, Alastair H
Evaluating possible intended and unintended consequences of the implementation of alcohol minimum unit pricing (MUP) in Scotland: a natural experiment protocol
title Evaluating possible intended and unintended consequences of the implementation of alcohol minimum unit pricing (MUP) in Scotland: a natural experiment protocol
title_full Evaluating possible intended and unintended consequences of the implementation of alcohol minimum unit pricing (MUP) in Scotland: a natural experiment protocol
title_fullStr Evaluating possible intended and unintended consequences of the implementation of alcohol minimum unit pricing (MUP) in Scotland: a natural experiment protocol
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating possible intended and unintended consequences of the implementation of alcohol minimum unit pricing (MUP) in Scotland: a natural experiment protocol
title_short Evaluating possible intended and unintended consequences of the implementation of alcohol minimum unit pricing (MUP) in Scotland: a natural experiment protocol
title_sort evaluating possible intended and unintended consequences of the implementation of alcohol minimum unit pricing (mup) in scotland: a natural experiment protocol
topic Addiction
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6596978/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31221890
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028482
work_keys_str_mv AT katikireddisrinivasavittal evaluatingpossibleintendedandunintendedconsequencesoftheimplementationofalcoholminimumunitpricingmupinscotlandanaturalexperimentprotocol
AT beestonclare evaluatingpossibleintendedandunintendedconsequencesoftheimplementationofalcoholminimumunitpricingmupinscotlandanaturalexperimentprotocol
AT millardandrew evaluatingpossibleintendedandunintendedconsequencesoftheimplementationofalcoholminimumunitpricingmupinscotlandanaturalexperimentprotocol
AT forsythross evaluatingpossibleintendedandunintendedconsequencesoftheimplementationofalcoholminimumunitpricingmupinscotlandanaturalexperimentprotocol
AT delucapaolo evaluatingpossibleintendedandunintendedconsequencesoftheimplementationofalcoholminimumunitpricingmupinscotlandanaturalexperimentprotocol
AT drummondcolin evaluatingpossibleintendedandunintendedconsequencesoftheimplementationofalcoholminimumunitpricingmupinscotlandanaturalexperimentprotocol
AT eadiedouglas evaluatingpossibleintendedandunintendedconsequencesoftheimplementationofalcoholminimumunitpricingmupinscotlandanaturalexperimentprotocol
AT grahamlesley evaluatingpossibleintendedandunintendedconsequencesoftheimplementationofalcoholminimumunitpricingmupinscotlandanaturalexperimentprotocol
AT hiltonshona evaluatingpossibleintendedandunintendedconsequencesoftheimplementationofalcoholminimumunitpricingmupinscotlandanaturalexperimentprotocol
AT ludbrookanne evaluatingpossibleintendedandunintendedconsequencesoftheimplementationofalcoholminimumunitpricingmupinscotlandanaturalexperimentprotocol
AT mccartneygerry evaluatingpossibleintendedandunintendedconsequencesoftheimplementationofalcoholminimumunitpricingmupinscotlandanaturalexperimentprotocol
AT phillipsthomas evaluatingpossibleintendedandunintendedconsequencesoftheimplementationofalcoholminimumunitpricingmupinscotlandanaturalexperimentprotocol
AT steadmartine evaluatingpossibleintendedandunintendedconsequencesoftheimplementationofalcoholminimumunitpricingmupinscotlandanaturalexperimentprotocol
AT fordallison evaluatingpossibleintendedandunintendedconsequencesoftheimplementationofalcoholminimumunitpricingmupinscotlandanaturalexperimentprotocol
AT bondlyndal evaluatingpossibleintendedandunintendedconsequencesoftheimplementationofalcoholminimumunitpricingmupinscotlandanaturalexperimentprotocol
AT leylandalastairh evaluatingpossibleintendedandunintendedconsequencesoftheimplementationofalcoholminimumunitpricingmupinscotlandanaturalexperimentprotocol