Cargando…

Using the theoretical domains framework and the behavioural change wheel in an overarching synthesis of systematic reviews

OBJECTIVE: Synthesis that can filter the evidence from multiple sources to inform the choice of intervention components is highly desirable yet, at present, there are few examples of systematic reviews that explicitly define this type of synthesis using behaviour change frameworks. Here, we demonstr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Richardson, Michelle, Khouja, Claire Louise, Sutcliffe, Katy, Thomas, James
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6596985/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31229999
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024950
_version_ 1783430529533607936
author Richardson, Michelle
Khouja, Claire Louise
Sutcliffe, Katy
Thomas, James
author_facet Richardson, Michelle
Khouja, Claire Louise
Sutcliffe, Katy
Thomas, James
author_sort Richardson, Michelle
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Synthesis that can filter the evidence from multiple sources to inform the choice of intervention components is highly desirable yet, at present, there are few examples of systematic reviews that explicitly define this type of synthesis using behaviour change frameworks. Here, we demonstrate how using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and the Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW) made it possible to bring together the findings from a series of three interconnected systematic reviews on the self-care of minor ailments (MAs) to inform the choice of intervention components. METHOD: The TDF and the capability, opportunity, motivation model of behaviour at the hub of the BCW were used to synthesise the findings from the three reviews, including syntheses of service-user views in interviews (review 1, 20 studies) and surveys (review 2, 13 studies), and evaluations of a range of interventions and services (review 3, 21 studies). RESULTS: The TDF and BCW approach provided a systematic, structured and replicable methodology for retrospectively integrating different types of evidence within a series of systematic reviews. Several intervention strategies, grounded in theory and discussed with key stakeholders, were suggested, which can be implemented and tested. CONCLUSIONS: This novel application of the TDF/BCW approach illustrates how it can be used to bring together quantitative and qualitative evidence to better understand self-care behaviour for MAs within a systematic review context. The TDF/BCW approach facilitated exploration of the contradictions and gaps between the separate review syntheses, and supported the identification of possible intervention strategies, grounded in theory. The ongoing development and refinement of this method is supported. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42017071515
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6596985
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65969852019-07-18 Using the theoretical domains framework and the behavioural change wheel in an overarching synthesis of systematic reviews Richardson, Michelle Khouja, Claire Louise Sutcliffe, Katy Thomas, James BMJ Open Research Methods OBJECTIVE: Synthesis that can filter the evidence from multiple sources to inform the choice of intervention components is highly desirable yet, at present, there are few examples of systematic reviews that explicitly define this type of synthesis using behaviour change frameworks. Here, we demonstrate how using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and the Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW) made it possible to bring together the findings from a series of three interconnected systematic reviews on the self-care of minor ailments (MAs) to inform the choice of intervention components. METHOD: The TDF and the capability, opportunity, motivation model of behaviour at the hub of the BCW were used to synthesise the findings from the three reviews, including syntheses of service-user views in interviews (review 1, 20 studies) and surveys (review 2, 13 studies), and evaluations of a range of interventions and services (review 3, 21 studies). RESULTS: The TDF and BCW approach provided a systematic, structured and replicable methodology for retrospectively integrating different types of evidence within a series of systematic reviews. Several intervention strategies, grounded in theory and discussed with key stakeholders, were suggested, which can be implemented and tested. CONCLUSIONS: This novel application of the TDF/BCW approach illustrates how it can be used to bring together quantitative and qualitative evidence to better understand self-care behaviour for MAs within a systematic review context. The TDF/BCW approach facilitated exploration of the contradictions and gaps between the separate review syntheses, and supported the identification of possible intervention strategies, grounded in theory. The ongoing development and refinement of this method is supported. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42017071515 BMJ Publishing Group 2019-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6596985/ /pubmed/31229999 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024950 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research Methods
Richardson, Michelle
Khouja, Claire Louise
Sutcliffe, Katy
Thomas, James
Using the theoretical domains framework and the behavioural change wheel in an overarching synthesis of systematic reviews
title Using the theoretical domains framework and the behavioural change wheel in an overarching synthesis of systematic reviews
title_full Using the theoretical domains framework and the behavioural change wheel in an overarching synthesis of systematic reviews
title_fullStr Using the theoretical domains framework and the behavioural change wheel in an overarching synthesis of systematic reviews
title_full_unstemmed Using the theoretical domains framework and the behavioural change wheel in an overarching synthesis of systematic reviews
title_short Using the theoretical domains framework and the behavioural change wheel in an overarching synthesis of systematic reviews
title_sort using the theoretical domains framework and the behavioural change wheel in an overarching synthesis of systematic reviews
topic Research Methods
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6596985/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31229999
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024950
work_keys_str_mv AT richardsonmichelle usingthetheoreticaldomainsframeworkandthebehaviouralchangewheelinanoverarchingsynthesisofsystematicreviews
AT khoujaclairelouise usingthetheoreticaldomainsframeworkandthebehaviouralchangewheelinanoverarchingsynthesisofsystematicreviews
AT sutcliffekaty usingthetheoreticaldomainsframeworkandthebehaviouralchangewheelinanoverarchingsynthesisofsystematicreviews
AT thomasjames usingthetheoreticaldomainsframeworkandthebehaviouralchangewheelinanoverarchingsynthesisofsystematicreviews