Cargando…

Research priorities and potential methodologies to inform care in subsequent pregnancies following stillbirth: a web-based survey of healthcare professionals, researchers and advocates

OBJECTIVES: To identify research priorities and explore potential methodologies to inform care in subsequent pregnancies following a stillbirth. DESIGN: Web-based survey by invitation. PARTICIPANTS: Multidisciplinary panel of 79 individuals involved in stillbirth research, clinical practice and/or a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wojcieszek, Aleena M, Heazell, Alexander EP, Middleton, Philippa, Ellwood, David, Silver, Robert M, Flenady, Vicki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6596997/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31230027
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028735
_version_ 1783430531155755008
author Wojcieszek, Aleena M
Heazell, Alexander EP
Middleton, Philippa
Ellwood, David
Silver, Robert M
Flenady, Vicki
author_facet Wojcieszek, Aleena M
Heazell, Alexander EP
Middleton, Philippa
Ellwood, David
Silver, Robert M
Flenady, Vicki
author_sort Wojcieszek, Aleena M
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To identify research priorities and explore potential methodologies to inform care in subsequent pregnancies following a stillbirth. DESIGN: Web-based survey by invitation. PARTICIPANTS: Multidisciplinary panel of 79 individuals involved in stillbirth research, clinical practice and/or advocacy from the international stillbirth research community (response rate=64%). OUTCOME MEASURES: Importance of 16 candidate research topics and perceived utility and appropriateness of randomised controlled trial (RCT) methodology for the evaluation of four pertinent interventions: (1) medical therapies for placental dysfunction (eg, antiplatelet agents); (2) additional antepartum fetal surveillance (eg, ultrasound scans); (3) early planned birth from 37 weeks’ gestation and (4) different forms of psychosocial support for parents and families. RESULTS: Candidate research topics that were rated as ‘important and urgent’ by the greatest proportion of participants were: medical therapies for placental dysfunction (81%); additional antepartum fetal surveillance (80%); the development of a core outcomes dataset for stillbirth research (79%); targeted antenatal interventions for women who have risk factors (79%) and calculating the risk of recurrent stillbirth according to specific causes of index stillbirth (79%). Whether RCT methodologies were considered appropriate for the four selected interventions varied depending on the criterion being assessed. For example, while 72% of respondents felt that RCTs were ‘the best way’ to evaluate medical therapies for placental dysfunction, fewer respondents (63%) deemed RCTs ethical in this context, and approximately only half (52%) felt that such RCTs were feasible. There was considerably less support for RCT methodology for the evaluation of different forms of psychosocial support, which was reinforced by free-text comments. CONCLUSIONS: Five priority research topics to inform care in pregnancies after stillbirth were identified. There was support for RCTs in this area, but the panel remained divided on the ethics and feasibility of such trials. Engagement with parents and families is a critical next step.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6596997
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-65969972019-07-18 Research priorities and potential methodologies to inform care in subsequent pregnancies following stillbirth: a web-based survey of healthcare professionals, researchers and advocates Wojcieszek, Aleena M Heazell, Alexander EP Middleton, Philippa Ellwood, David Silver, Robert M Flenady, Vicki BMJ Open Evidence Based Practice OBJECTIVES: To identify research priorities and explore potential methodologies to inform care in subsequent pregnancies following a stillbirth. DESIGN: Web-based survey by invitation. PARTICIPANTS: Multidisciplinary panel of 79 individuals involved in stillbirth research, clinical practice and/or advocacy from the international stillbirth research community (response rate=64%). OUTCOME MEASURES: Importance of 16 candidate research topics and perceived utility and appropriateness of randomised controlled trial (RCT) methodology for the evaluation of four pertinent interventions: (1) medical therapies for placental dysfunction (eg, antiplatelet agents); (2) additional antepartum fetal surveillance (eg, ultrasound scans); (3) early planned birth from 37 weeks’ gestation and (4) different forms of psychosocial support for parents and families. RESULTS: Candidate research topics that were rated as ‘important and urgent’ by the greatest proportion of participants were: medical therapies for placental dysfunction (81%); additional antepartum fetal surveillance (80%); the development of a core outcomes dataset for stillbirth research (79%); targeted antenatal interventions for women who have risk factors (79%) and calculating the risk of recurrent stillbirth according to specific causes of index stillbirth (79%). Whether RCT methodologies were considered appropriate for the four selected interventions varied depending on the criterion being assessed. For example, while 72% of respondents felt that RCTs were ‘the best way’ to evaluate medical therapies for placental dysfunction, fewer respondents (63%) deemed RCTs ethical in this context, and approximately only half (52%) felt that such RCTs were feasible. There was considerably less support for RCT methodology for the evaluation of different forms of psychosocial support, which was reinforced by free-text comments. CONCLUSIONS: Five priority research topics to inform care in pregnancies after stillbirth were identified. There was support for RCTs in this area, but the panel remained divided on the ethics and feasibility of such trials. Engagement with parents and families is a critical next step. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6596997/ /pubmed/31230027 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028735 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Evidence Based Practice
Wojcieszek, Aleena M
Heazell, Alexander EP
Middleton, Philippa
Ellwood, David
Silver, Robert M
Flenady, Vicki
Research priorities and potential methodologies to inform care in subsequent pregnancies following stillbirth: a web-based survey of healthcare professionals, researchers and advocates
title Research priorities and potential methodologies to inform care in subsequent pregnancies following stillbirth: a web-based survey of healthcare professionals, researchers and advocates
title_full Research priorities and potential methodologies to inform care in subsequent pregnancies following stillbirth: a web-based survey of healthcare professionals, researchers and advocates
title_fullStr Research priorities and potential methodologies to inform care in subsequent pregnancies following stillbirth: a web-based survey of healthcare professionals, researchers and advocates
title_full_unstemmed Research priorities and potential methodologies to inform care in subsequent pregnancies following stillbirth: a web-based survey of healthcare professionals, researchers and advocates
title_short Research priorities and potential methodologies to inform care in subsequent pregnancies following stillbirth: a web-based survey of healthcare professionals, researchers and advocates
title_sort research priorities and potential methodologies to inform care in subsequent pregnancies following stillbirth: a web-based survey of healthcare professionals, researchers and advocates
topic Evidence Based Practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6596997/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31230027
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028735
work_keys_str_mv AT wojcieszekaleenam researchprioritiesandpotentialmethodologiestoinformcareinsubsequentpregnanciesfollowingstillbirthawebbasedsurveyofhealthcareprofessionalsresearchersandadvocates
AT heazellalexanderep researchprioritiesandpotentialmethodologiestoinformcareinsubsequentpregnanciesfollowingstillbirthawebbasedsurveyofhealthcareprofessionalsresearchersandadvocates
AT middletonphilippa researchprioritiesandpotentialmethodologiestoinformcareinsubsequentpregnanciesfollowingstillbirthawebbasedsurveyofhealthcareprofessionalsresearchersandadvocates
AT ellwooddavid researchprioritiesandpotentialmethodologiestoinformcareinsubsequentpregnanciesfollowingstillbirthawebbasedsurveyofhealthcareprofessionalsresearchersandadvocates
AT silverrobertm researchprioritiesandpotentialmethodologiestoinformcareinsubsequentpregnanciesfollowingstillbirthawebbasedsurveyofhealthcareprofessionalsresearchersandadvocates
AT flenadyvicki researchprioritiesandpotentialmethodologiestoinformcareinsubsequentpregnanciesfollowingstillbirthawebbasedsurveyofhealthcareprofessionalsresearchersandadvocates